Practice Management Solution
von Medical Information Technology2.5 / 5 25 Bewertungen
Durchschnittliche Bewertung25 Bewertungen
- Gesamt 2.5 / 5
- Benutzerfreundlichkeit 2.5 / 5
- Kundenservice 2.5 / 5
- Funktionen 2.5 / 5
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 2.5 / 5
Installiert - Windows
Angaben zum Hersteller
- Medical Information Technology
Über Practice Management Solution
A fully integrated practice management solution developed to serve the needs of clinicians and administrative staff in practices and clinics.
Practice Management Solution Funktionen
- EMR / EHR (elektronische / medizinische Gesundheitsberichte)
- Elektronische Rezepte
- HIPAA konform
- Medizinische Terminplanung
- Mehrere Büros
- Mehrere Ärzte
- Überprüfung der Versicherungsberechtigung
Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Practice Management Solution
Bewertet am 20.4.2017
Meditech Magic vs Client Server
Kommentare: I have used both Magic and Client Server and find the latter much more intuitive. Meditech Magic looks like a bare bones version of Client Server. I worked in the IT department at the Magic hospital, and the report writer was able to create new reports very easily on the fly. The hospital was constantly changing various screens since it was so easy to do (not necessarily a good thing). I was an end-user at the Client Server hospital so I don't have the same level of knowledge of the IT side. Customer support seemed fair at both locations.
Vorteile: Meditech Magic is easier to build onsite and report options are good; Client Server is more user friendly and visually appealing.
Nachteile: Meditech Magic screens are more difficult to understand and navigate; client server can be overhwhelming in terms of the number of tabs and amount of information on the screen.
Bewertet am 12.1.2018
Great for Clinical AND B/AR users; redundant if you only use one or the other
Vorteile: I love that it combines billing (front and back end) AND clinical documentation. It makes billing and coding, compliance audits and claims review SO much easier than other software.
Nachteile: Since Epic came out, Meditech lacks a lot of features, like insurance verification, faxing charts, etc. Meditech also forces all processes to be entered repetitively, and for those who are strictly clinical or strictly b/ar, it seems tedious.
Bewertet am 28.9.2016
Cumbersome, slow, unintuitive, dysfunctional
Vorteile: Nothing. According to our administration, the system cost millions of dollars for our small community hospital. Yet our IT dept. had to build the system. I was very involved in this process. But there are many inherent limitations of this software. The company did send there people to our hospital for support, they were good, but they frequently said 'it can't do this' or 'it can't do that' when asked why/what can be done to streamline or expand any specific screen or template for any given item.
Nachteile: It is inherently slow. It takes many clicks to accomplish a single step. We have a very good IT dept. and we built the software customized to our hospital. But the system is inherently dysfunctional. There area many examples including very limited number of characters that can be entered by free text in there small box space, then it may unexpectedly delete any of this info. The med reconciliation is cumbersome and inflexible, looking up old records is slow and difficult, and the whole system in unintuitive. We were forced to use the system in my department, but some staff Dr's refused to use it. I used this software at 2 different hospitals and both were bad. There was universal agreement of our med staff that even after a couple of yrs of it being in place, nobody liked it.
Bewertet am 9.6.2017
Kommentare: Great product overall and get compliments that it's better than some othe EHR competitors.
Vorteile: Easy to use and user friendly. Very competitive application. We are able to customize too which makes it more adaptable to our workflow.
Nachteile: Updates seem to cause issues for some time. We find several bugs after each update but that comes with the territory.
Bewertet am 26.2.2019
Kommentare: Used this EHR in medium sized hospital for rounding and care of orthopedic patients. Mostly was good at allowing access to information both within and outside of the hospital. I didn't like not being able to finish my rounding from the office though due to no ability to write a progress note directly into the system. Paper notes got scanned after patient discharge.
Simple windows for accessing information
Remote access is possible if setup by administration
Images accessible from within the program without needing a separate PACs system.
Inability to write or dictate a note directly in the system.
Discharges seemed to take a long time with extra steps and multiple clicks (this could more hospital issue vs EHR).