Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist WebPT?

Mit 40 % Marktanteil ist WebPT eine führende OT-Plattform zur Verbesserung der Patientenversorgung und zum Fördern des Geschäftswachstums. Mit Terminplanung, Dokumentation, Abrechnung, Ergebnisverfolgung, Business-Berichterstattung, Tools zur Patientenbindung und Systemintegrationen ist die robuste webbasierte Lösung von WebPT ideal für jede ambulante Umgebung geeignet, unabhängig von der Mitarbeiteranzahl, dem Einrichtungstyp oder der Anzahl der Fachgebiete. WebPT hat eine Bindungsrate von 99 % und eine Verfügbarkeitsrate von 99,99 %.

Wer verwendet WebPT?

WebPT wird von ambulanten Physiotherapie-, Ergotherapie- und Sprachtherapiepraxen in den USA und Kanada eingesetzt. Derzeit werden mehr als 10.000 Kliniken und 70.000 Therapeut*innen unterstützt.

WebPT Software - 1
WebPT Software - 2
WebPT Software - 3
WebPT Software - 4
WebPT Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob WebPT das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

WebPT

WebPT

4,3 (462)
99,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
97
5
4,3 (462)
4,1 (462)
4,2 (462)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
139,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
128
11
3,9 (2.781)
3,6 (2.781)
3,8 (2.781)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu WebPT

Mindbody
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Echtzeit-Planung
Mobiler Zugriff
Online-Buchung
eClinicalWorks
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
HIPAA konform
Terminplanung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
EHR 24/7
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
EMR / EHR
Elektronische Rezepte
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
TheraOffice
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Medizinische Abrechnung
Patienten-Terminplanung
Tebra
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
HIPAA konform
Terminplanung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
Practice Fusion
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Elektronische Rezepte
HIPAA konform
InsightEMR
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
HENO
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Dokumentenmanagement
HIPAA konform
Terminverwaltung
Helix
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.

Bewertungen über WebPT

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,3
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,2
Funktionen
4,2
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,1

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
54%
4
31%
3
10%
2
1%
1
4%
Shoshana Malka
Shoshana Malka
Project Coordinator in Israel
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Medizinische Praxis, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

WebPT Review by Physical Therapy clinic

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I use WebPT daily because I get authorization for the patients that are doing Physical Therapy in our clinic. I review the notes and use the information to submit my authorization requests. We see approximately 20-30 patients a day so I'm looking over a lot of WebPT therapy notes.

Vorteile:

It has very clear templates and it's easy to find information. The records are very easy for even a layperson to understand, but thorough enough that the insurance companies easily provide authorization for services. Even when we need to have a substitute from an agency they are able to plug the information into the note and keep to the format we are used to thanks to WebPT

Nachteile:

I don't like that it costs money to integrate each aspect separately, we currently have an account you can't use for billing. I also can't see the calendar view so if the name of a patient is misspelled it's hard to pull up their account.

Jeanette
Jeanette
President in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

WebPT is good BUT expensive!

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Decent experience. Very functional but tedious with time consumption. There are a lot better options available with more inclusive features for less cost.

Vorteile:

Easy to understand. Able to create evaluation and treatment templates so that you didn't have to write the same verbiage. Could carry over notes from the time before.

Nachteile:

Expensive. Require multiple tabs open for the same patient because the SOAP note and the exercise flowsheet were not on the same page. It took 15-20 minutes to complete a note because of toggling between multiple tabs. Offered a lot of features for exercises and CRM but all extra features were a la carte. The expense for a solo practitioner and then to add users was too expensive. It would have been better to charge per number of visits per month vs. number of users. EMR and billing integration was not as synced as should have bee.

Kelli
Patient Service Coordinator in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

WebPT User

5,0 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

It is relatively easy to learn and train new employees on

Nachteile:

It is difficult to change anything or go back to fix anything without administrative access. Thus there are a lot of addendums and emails that happen before things are fixed.

Dan
Admin Office in
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Administration

1,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: From a therapist prospective, it is easy to use but there are cons.

Vorteile:

Therapists say it is easy to use. You may scan documents into the program for storage which is helpful. The ability to have a 'comment section' that therapist see when seeing a patient is nice. You can put a unique comment regarding the payer here such as X insurance does not allow X treatment

Nachteile:

Reports are pitiful. We have to do so much manual work to see what we need to see. Also compliance is very lacking. For example, some insurance contracts allow us to bill the 8 minute rule by unique cpt code per CPT rules (not Medicare/Federal programs which have more restrictive rules with total time Trump). For these commercial contracts if a provider does 12 minutes of 97140, 12 minutes of 97110 and 12 minutes of 97112 we can bill 3 units even through the total time is only 36 minutes. (Please take a Gwenda seminar for all the documentation to show in certain circumstances where this is allowed for non-Medicare non-Federal payers). In order to handle this scenario in WebPT, you must shut off all over-site. If you shut off all over-site, things get crazy. For example, if a therapist accidently logs 30 units instead of 30 minutes, WebPT will now not notify you. The only way to proof before billing to see how many minutes is assigned to each cpt code is to open each an every note and look. There is NO REPORT or billing log that will tell you how many minutes are assigned to each cpt code. That is why I spend 8 hours every two weeks opening each and every note for specific payers to see if units are assigned correctly. I commonly find 22 minutes of 97140 where the therapist assigned 2 units to this. This is overbilling and I have to manually open each note to catch it. Other major software out there can easily handle this scenario. Also, the system will not give cancel/no show rates per each unique provider. We have to manually do this. Also, we can run a great report for Medicare but not for any other payers. For example our state has a unique requirement for rehab agencies in which we have to do recerts more frequently than required by Medicare. We can run a report for Medicare to help track when they are due, but there is not the option to run this same report for other payers in addition to Medicare. It's very frustrating that our info is in there but we can't report on it. In retrospect we wish we would have went with Clinicient, BMS or something else.

Heidi
Physical Therapist and Owner in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great PT EMR

5,0 vor 9 Monaten

Kommentare: Works well for what I need. Reminds me when progress notes are coming due even though I don’t use the scheduling part of the product, keeps track of plan or care dates and ability to customize is just flexible enough without getting overly complicated.

Vorteile:

Responsiveness to assistance and updating product based on feedback.

Nachteile:

1- Previous measures do not carry over into new progress notes in SOAP 2.02-SOAP 2.0 documents print out/ fax layout takes up too much space and pages. 3- No option to email or securely send documents other than fax.