Was ist Cityworks?

Asset management system that helps local governments & utility agencies Issue and track requests for service and work orders.

Wer verwendet Cityworks?

Cloud-based asset management solution that helps local governments schedule maintenance, manage submissions & more.

Wo kann Cityworks bereitgestellt werden?

Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil)

Über den Anbieter

  • Azteca Systems
  • 1986 gegründet
  • Telefon-Support
  • 24/7 Live-Support
  • Chat

Erhältlich in diesen Ländern

Vereinigte Staaten

Sprachen

Englisch

Über den Anbieter

  • Azteca Systems
  • 1986 gegründet
  • Telefon-Support
  • 24/7 Live-Support
  • Chat

Erhältlich in diesen Ländern

Vereinigte Staaten

Sprachen

Englisch

Cityworks – Videos und Bilder

Cityworks Software - 1
Cityworks Software - 2
Cityworks Software - 3
4 weitere anzeigen
Videos zu Cityworks
Cityworks Software - 1
Cityworks Software - 2
Cityworks Software - 3

Kosten ähnlicher Produkte wie Cityworks vergleichen

Cityworks

1.995,00 $/einmalig
Kostenlose Version
Gratis Testen
50,00 $/Monat
Kostenlose Version
Gratis Testen
Nicht verfügbar
Kostenlose Version
Gratis Testen
69,95 $/Monat
Kostenlose Version
Gratis Testen

Cityworks Funktionen

  • Code-Durchführung
  • Compliance Management
  • Genehmigungserteilung
  • Inspektions-Management
  • Self-Service Portal

Alternativen für Cityworks

GIS-centric software to track service requests, work orders, inventory, permits, licenses, code enforcement, citizen tickets, and more.
Vereinfache deine Arbeit mit dieser nutzerfreundlichen und hochflexiblen mobilen und Web-Kundenservicelösung.
Integrierte Sammlung von GIS-Software-Produkten; bietet eine standardisierte Plattform für Raumanalyse, Datenmanagement und Mapping.
Caspio ist eine Low-Code-Plattform zur Erstellung von Online-Datenbankanwendungen ohne Programmierung. Erfahre mehr über Caspio
Eine äußerst einfache Wartungssoftware für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. Kontaktiere das Unternehmen für eine kostenlose Demo, Testversion oder ein Angebot.
Wowflow ist eine mobile Software, die Wartungs- und Instandhaltungs-Teams hilft, mit weniger Aufwand effizientere Arbeit zu leisten.
Asset Essentials ist eine cloudbasierte Wartungslösung, die für das tägliche erweiterte Wartungsbetriebsmanagement entwickelt wurde.
McMain Software is a Maintenance Management solution that optimizes asset management and improves your maintenance processes.
Für Regierungen, die effizient arbeiten wollen.
A cloud-based software solution for managing your permitting, planning, licensing, code enforcement and fire/safety inspections needs.
SmartSimple Cloud empowers government grantmakers of all sizes to track, manage, and report on the full lifecycle of funding programs.
Municity was created to improve efficiency across municipal departments using one complete solution.
Snappii ist ein führendes Unternehmen für mobile Apps und Formular-Apps. Über 500.000 Menschen nutzen Snappii Business Apps in über 30 Branchen.

Bewertungen über Cityworks

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,2
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,7
Kundenservice
3,4
Funktionen
4,0
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,3

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
33%
4
50%
3
17%
Verifizierter Rezensent
Asst Director of Public Works in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Staatsverwaltung, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

great for public works

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Our previous work order program did not have a mapping feature and also did not allow you to track costs. We now can track costs in many different ways (by asset, by location, by date, by time period, etc.).

Vorteile:

The mapping feature allows us to see problem areas instead of just looking at a list.

Nachteile:

If you schedule repeat work orders, they are created immediately upon completion of the current work order. This tends to clutter up your list of work orders.

Matt
Business Systems Specialist Sr in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Work and Asset Management Workhorse

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Good experience with feedback from our users to allow us to make Cityworks what they need and to make it more user friendly for users who do not have a GIS background.

Vorteile:

This is a very scalable software for work and asset management. The best part is that it is 100% GIS based. It is also very customizable through XML and JS changes. We have made it our own to what our users require.

Nachteile:

The separate map page can be hard to work with. Most of our users prefer to use GIS Search. We have also customized the work order page to include an imbedded map.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Office Manager in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Expensive and difficult to use, but does what it's supposed to (most of the time)

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Good reporting and functions well with ESRI GIS to give accurate cost analyses of assets in their mapped areas. Does what it promises.

Vorteile:

Good capabilities in both reporting, visualisation of work being done and cost associated with those areas. Integrates well with GIS data and does keep track of asset costs like it promises.

Nachteile:

Managing the software in-house is difficult to do because it's not exactly intuitive. Employees often have a hard time interacting with the software unless they've been trained specifically - and even then they often need assistance. Working with third-party consultants can work, but then you have the added cost and hassle.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Administrative Professional- Asset Data Coordinator in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Staatsverwaltung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cityworks, effective but not intuitive.

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: I have been a Cityworks user for 5+ years, it has been great for tracking staff hours and integrates fairly well with payroll systems. Reports have been useful in day to day tracking of equipment, labour & materials used for wide variety of tasks.

Vorteile:

I like the ability to track a wide variety of items, from staff hours, to vehicles, to historical data on particular assets. The reports can be customized to virtually any configuration. Possibilities seem endless from a user point of view. Once trained thoroughly on the system it is easy enough to use and even new tasks can be figured out with a bit of digging. Mapping works well to "see" the assets you need to select... asset manager is better used when you know all details of assets in order to select.

Nachteile:

Search feature is not easy and often comes up with no data when data exists. There are too many fields and variable to choose from "out of the box" , needs excessive customizations to fine tune. Requires an effective team to do "back end" work to keep user friendly. Some tasks are not customizable limiting useages. Extensive training is necessary to really use system effectively, untrained users can really mess up data.

Robert
Acting Manager of Public Works in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Staatsverwaltung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Azteca Cityworks Review

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: It works well in helping schedule work, show the total cost of finishing work, and visually depicting asset management.

Vorteile:

This system is highly configurable to help meet end user needs. Some of the recent web based add-ons have really helped what used to require a high learning curve. The ability to see work visually on a map and the direct connect to GIS is also quite nice.

Nachteile:

I'd like to see more integrations with more 3rd party road applications (though this may not be their fault), a recent change to separate maps onto a different tab makes it hard on remote users working with tablets.