Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist FWi?

Mit über 6.000 Kunden und mehr als 500.000 bereitgestellten Bildschirmen steuert die FWI-Softwareplattform jeden Tag die visuelle Kommunikation für Millionen von Menschen in Flughäfen, Banken, auf Firmengelände, in professionellen Sportstadien, Krankenhäusern, Hotels, Casinos, Universitäten, Produktionsstätten und Einzelhandelsgeschäften. FWIs Software ist bekannt für ihre fortschrittliche Funktionalität – Live-Daten, Interaktivität, Wegfindung, dynamische Planung – die es Kunden ermöglicht, viele Arten von Anwendungen auf vielen Bildschirmen bereitzustellen.

Wer verwendet FWi?

Die FWI-Softwareplattform steuert jeden Tag die visuelle Kommunikation für Millionen von Menschen in Flughäfen, Banken, auf Firmengelände, in Sportstadien, Krankenhäusern, Hotels, Casinos, Universitäten und Produktionsstätten.

FWi Software - 1
FWi Software - 2
FWi Software - 3
FWi Software - 4

Du bist nicht sicher, ob FWi das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

FWi

FWi

4,6 (43)
0,01 $
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
39
6
4,3 (43)
4,4 (43)
4,5 (43)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
8,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
77
38
4,7 (2.804)
4,8 (2.804)
4,7 (2.804)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu FWi

SiteKiosk
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Yodeck
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Inhalte planen
Remote-Display-Management
Spiellisten-Management
Vibe
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aktivitäts-/Newsfeeds
Inhalte planen
Remote-Display-Management
Uniguest
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Connecteam
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Mitarbeitereinsatzplanung
Mobiler Zugriff
Online-Zeiterfassung
NoviSign
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Layout und Design
Remote-Display-Management
Spiellisten-Management
Appspace
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Inhalte planen
Medienbibliothek
Spiellisten-Management
ConnectedSign
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Automatisches Aktualisieren
Datensicherheit
Layout und Design
monday.com
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Bestandsverfolgung
Mehrere Kampagnen
Mitarbeitermanagement

Bewertungen über FWi

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,6
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,5
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
70%
4
26%
3
2%
2
2%
Ben
Ben
VP Operations in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Rundfunkmedien, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

It's not perfect, but it's as close as any signage software has gotten

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: I have done countless projects using FWi as the foundation for our solutions. No matter what the project required, I was able to get it done with FWi. They have some of the best features available for data integration, content playback, performance, and network management. It's also quick to pick up and use without any training if you're just trying to get content on to some screens quickly. For those looking to do very complex projects, the software is powerful and can do just about anything, but you may need to be somewhat familiar with more advanced technical concepts. No "wizards" found here.

Vorteile:

The way locations, templates and content cascade down the network tree is both familiar and intuitive, but don't let the simplicity fool you: there are powerful features and settings just under the surface if you know where to look that allow you to build almost anything you can think of.

Nachteile:

Accomplishing complex solutions like integrating unique data structures or getting certain behaviors to function properly can involve some trial and error. Documentation for more advanced abilities in the past has been notoriously lacking, although there has been some improvement since they switched to their community portal. The appearance of the CMD software seems a bit antiquated, like old Windows programs.

Josh
Graphic Design Manager / Network Manager in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Glücksspiel & Casinos, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Need a bigger shoe?

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

Eventually, if you're like me, you'll push the limits of you CMS. I like to do more. Maybe you started out wanting to push images to a single display. However, as your business grows, you may now need to pull live data and push that to your display giving your staff up to date metrics to judge business decisions. Does your current Content Management system provide that? Maybe it doesn't. Maybe you didn't know you needed that. I've discovered over the last twelve years as a designer and CMS admin I needed an overly robust shoe to perform in. I outgrew my last CMS and needed more functionality. FourWinds was that bigger shoe, for me. As I grow to do more with my digital signage the FourWinds platform is growing faster and I can't keep up. Thats a good thing! You don't want to eventually outgrow your shoe, you want your shoe to grow with you. Changing your CMS, because it can't keep up what with your business needs is painful. I done it three times and it's a pain, to say the least. To sum it up, the FourWinds content management system seems to have few boundaries and I like that the most.

Nachteile:

If I had to come up with what I like least about the FourWinds software my list wouldn't be long. I have to separate my gripes into two categories. Are my issues caused by the media player I'm choosing to use or is it the software? Most of my gripes are directed at the media player which, really, has nothing to do with the software at all. So, separating the two, I would wish for a way to bulk upload assets. Each month I create, upload and schedule 40-60 promotional assets. If I could select, schedule, set duration of play, days to play, upload, etc. as a bulk list without doing it one at a time would save me considerable time. That would be what I like least about this software.

Marcia
Assoc. Dir. Of Cat. and Conf. Services in USA
Gastgewerbe, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Inconsitent

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Sometimes great sometimes no answers... I have been pending info now for about 2 weeks

Vorteile:

Automation, i do not have to manually enter information. It saves me time when it works

Nachteile:

Inconsistency. Sometimes i call and the person is helpful and great and other is like a tunnel with no end

Justin
Justin
Manager, Digital Projects & Web Development in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Hochschulbildung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Streamlined our signage system

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Great customer service that is quick to repsond and offer insights in solving problems we have encountered with our deployment.

Vorteile:

We had 3 old systems, one for wayfinding, one for signage and 1 a bit of both. Four Winds Interactive allowed us to consolidate our signage/wayfinding into 1 system and gain loads of functionality at the same time. I could build the system I imagined from scratch utilizing Four Winds Interactive. This included creating my own templates, design and touch functionality to make it work best for our audience. It could integrate with 3rd party data utilizing JSON or XML which makes it extremely versatile.

Nachteile:

Many past problems I have run into including documentation, etc are being actively addressed by the company with enhancements coming to the customer portal. Content Manager Desktop is only available on Windows (which creates extra steps for Mac users like myself) but with their new Cloud system I need to open Content Manager Desktop less frequently.

Nate
Nate
Services Lead in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Hochschulbildung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FWI in higher ed

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: In higher education, we're trying to improve the student experience so that we can attract and retain students. FWI helps to keep students engaged with what is happening on campus.

Vorteile:

The strongest aspect of FWI signage software is the ability to integrate with so many sources of data, including RSS, XML, SQL, and JSON. This has allowed us to greatly reduce the time spent manually managing sign content, as the signs update themselves as information is entered into our many different systems of record which serve as sources of content/data.

Nachteile:

The Content Manager Desktop application, as it exists currently, is Windows-only and is much too complex for a beginning user who will only need to make simple image/video content updates. The application is incredibly powerful and makes sense to a power user, but I'm glad to see the FWI Cloud content library start to become available to serve the needs of basic content contributors.