Was ist Fiix?
Fiix schafft einfach zu bedienende, intelligente Wartungsmanagement-Software, die es Unternehmen erlaubt, ihre Wartungsabteilungen zu organisieren und Daten in umsetzbare Erkenntnisse umzuwandeln. Sein innovatives Multi-Tenant-Cloud-basiertes CMMS mobilisiert die Wartungsbelegschaft mit einer beispiellosen mobilen Erfahrung und fügt sich nahtlos in Enterprise-Software ein, um die gesamte Organisation zu verbinden, und revolutioniert, wie Tausende von Unternehmen weltweit Wartungen planen, organisieren und verfolgen.
Wer verwendet Fiix?
Für eine einfachere Wartung, Arbeitsaufträge und Asset Management. Egal, ob Sie ein Team von 5 oder 500 sind, 1 oder 100 Standorten verwalten - Fiix ist das Werkzeug, das Sie brauchen, um Projekte in jeder Branche vorwärts zu bewegen.
Wo kann Fiix bereitgestellt werden?
Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil)
Fiix – Videos und Bilder
Kosten ähnlicher Produkte wie Fiix vergleichen
- Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
- Anpassbare Berichte
- Anpassbare Felder
- Asset Lifecycle Management
- Asset Planung
- Audit Trail
- Barcode / RFID
- Barcode / Tickets scannen
- Berichterstattung / Analyse
- Berichterstattung und Statistik
- Compliance Management
- Einkauf & Empfang
- Für mechanische Ausrüstung
- Historische Berichte
- Mobiler Zugriff
- Prädiktive Wartung
- Verfolgen von Vermögensanlagen
- Verfolgung von Ausfallzeiten
- Verwaltung von Einzelteilen
- Vorbeugende Wartung
Alternativen für Fiix
Bewertungen über Fiix
Best Engineering system
Kommentare: Fiix MACMMS is very reliable and easy to use in our hotel especially our engineering department. Beforem they are using Excel to record all work order until work completed and it's very hard for us to trace the work order because of this manual system. But after deploying the FIIX, our job makes easier and the response time to attend to our guests' needs is now very fast.
The FIIX is a very useful system not only for Engineering department but for all department in our hotel because this system has an inventory system and purchasing module. very user friendly and easy to setup.
I wish we could also add/change a logo to our company logo under basic plan because it's not applicable to our existing plan.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Fiix Fixed our Maintenance Organization
Fiix is an incredible package for companies looking for a flexible CMMS. The Work Order System and it's flexibility to schedule tickets to Machines, Assets or Projects is very useful in our organization. We have a smaller maintenance department so we mix our activities with both in-house and contracted technicians. The Work Order system allows for us to assign an open ticket to a project that can then be tracked and closed after the vendor has completed the work.
When it comes to a downside to this software I haven't really found one yet. The customer service and flexibility has made it very easy to transition. If I had to point to one thing it would be that we could reuse some of our field names from the old database, but this was easily overcome by a great on-boarding. experience
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Good value for the pricing.
Billing and subscription service has been easy to navigate.
If an issue cannot be resolved quickly , Fiix has been helpful to find a work-around.
In general, Fiix is slow to respond to customer service requests and feature additions.
Work orders are easy to generate and scheduled maintenance setup is straightforward. Nested PMs and event triggers are great for "if-then" scenarios where more work is required based on the results of a regular PM. Reports are customizable with the upper-tier account. Inventory management is quick and easy when the system is used on a tablet or smart device. The mobile app is easy to set up and use. Permissions for highly customizable for user groups.
Asset codes and model number are not visible on the asset list; The user has to view the asset to see the information. Only a Grainger account can be linked for inventory lookup. Most inventory cannot be populated automatically by part number. However, in Fiix's defense, it may be difficult to get permission from vendors. The report writer uses SQL code, but all of the SQL functions are not available in the interface. WO review and approval from technician to engineer to management is not automated.
This will carry us through scaling up
Kommentare: I generally love the platform and its capacity/depth for our assets. This will likely be moved over into our other departments (Machinery, Construction) as I finish developing and implementing this for our HVAC PM department.
I love the cross-integration between my field technicians, accounting, and warehousing. My equipment has all of the attached parts information that relates back to my warehouse as we consume materials and notifies my accounting and warehousing teams when we're below our required threshold. This is incredible software, it's able to keep all of our invoicing together and associate it with a track record of each part's purchasing history and cost over time. Very excited to use this to its fullest.
There are some things that would be nice for the initialization phase of creating all of the assets, namely that "save and create another" asset should carry over much of the prior item's data. For those of us without a csv to upload into Fiix, it seems easiest to go through each plant by asset type, so much of the data stays the same from asset to asset, until that type is finished. Often times, I ended up going back through to double check my new assets before moving on to creating the next new type of asset (i.e. AHU to RTU to MAU, etc. ). Also, it would be nice to have a standard daily report that can include a technician's work from the day, including the actual photos uploaded by them, and have it sent to a set list of email addresses.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
14 months into FIIX use
Kommentare: Overall experience, we received a product we could quickly and easily fill but then with further review most of that info needs to change and be improved. Once again I think the software needs a bit more standard structure for initial asset inputs. I think an onsite installer with more practical manufacturing environment would have also helped. One example, we were told to set each PM completion time to 10% of PM frequency which is basically impossible in our field. A Monthly PM only allows 3 days to complete when all Maintenance teams would expect to be compliant to complete PM at anytime within the 30 days in each month.
The open architecture and ease of adding assets and PMs
The same as what we originally liked. The open architecture allows users to create assets without much of the info needed within a PM system. Asset creation should be more structured and then allow additional inputs for special info but asset should require info about model serial number purchase and current cost. Since we began the entries without this info, I can add it later but info won't be standard for all assets unless I remove each and add back once I determine all info needed for each. It was nice not to need this info in beginning but makes the product I have less useful that it would have been if we were forced to add this standard information from the begining