Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden
Campaign Manager Aristotle
Was ist Campaign Manager Aristotle?
Verfolgt und verwaltet Spendensammelaktivitäten, erstellt staatliche und föderale Compliance-Berichte und vieles mehr. Zentrale Features sind: 1) Online-Spendenseiten optimiert für Handy und Facebook 2) Compliance-Berichte optimiert mit Speicher- und E-Datei-Fähigkeit 3) Senden und Verfolgen von E-Mail-Kampagnen mit besseren Kommunikationswerkzeugen 4) Entwickelt für ALLE Kampagnen lokal, landesweit oder bundesweit 5) Daten werden sicher in der Cloud gespeichert, unabhängig vom Gerät – Tablet, Smartphone oder Computer
Wer verwendet Campaign Manager Aristotle?
Jede große oder kleine Kampagne, unabhängig von politischer Ideologie oder Parteizugehörigkeit.
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Campaign Manager Aristotle das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Campaign Manager Aristotle
Bewertungen über Campaign Manager Aristotle
Saving me time and money
Vorteile:
Campaign Manager allows me to keep track of active donors in my state and develop data-driven fundraising strategies for campaigns small and large. Having all my records and notes archived in one place is incredibly efficient, saving me time and money.
Nachteile:
It doesn't negatively affect my interaction with the software but I feel like the developers have tried to provide more features than is necessary. Focus on what makes the product great and drop the features not being used.
Excellent Product
Kommentare: The speed of Campaign Manager is extremely beneficial. Often overlooked and taken for granted, the program moves quick. I’ve used other software programs that move slow, do not respond quickly and time out often. Nothing is more frustrating than not being able to do your job because the software is moving slow.
Vorteile:
In my line of work, time is the most value asset I have is time. The import and de-duplication tools are a huge time saver for me. Moreover, the data entry sequence layouts are presented in a way that streamlines my data entry in a fast and methodical way. Donor analytics is paramount to raising more money for the campaign. Having the ability to identify donor history and giving patterns, helps my committees better craft direct mail and digital fundraising pieces. We can target donor history and patterns, more thoroughly, identifying donors at varying contribution levels to maximize our fundraising efforts.
Nachteile:
The speed and the register display. At times, the register does not total correctly. Additionally, the undeposited funds displays in the register. I wish it would not do that.
Good software and helpful tool for GR shops.
Kommentare: I've used Aristotle for a couple of years now and there are some functions that could be better, but overall it is a helpful tool for our GR campaigns and they are always willing to reach out and help solve an issue.
Vorteile:
Customer Service and built in web forms.
Nachteile:
Too many features and sometimes it crashes.
won't work without it
Kommentare: I simply will not take a client who won't use it. It is relatively expensive, but I know that a credible client wants the best tools available. It's also a sign to me that they take compliance seriously.
Vorteile:
Total functionalilty - expecially with tressury and reporting features. We mainly use it for this event though it has many overall campaign management features
Nachteile:
For budgeting, I would like to split expense categories when entering expenses. Currently I have to do multiple expense entries even though I wrote one check to a vendor across several categories.
It's all in the details
Kommentare: I've used CM for over fifteen years, so overall, I think it's one of the best. However, I had better more efficient and quicker technical support when CM was not part of Aristotle. The technical support is frustrating and inefficient, particularly when one has a client that is demanding.
Vorteile:
The detailed notes, categories, codes, and ability to track every little detail.
Nachteile:
There have been times it was quite clunky to run a report. It appears many reports are easier to run than they used to be. When searching for a person--say first name "A" last name Griffin it should bring up first letter A and all last name Griffins, but instead pulls up many first names beginning with other letters--so that is frustrating.