--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Sightview zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Sightview Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Optiker Software](/directory/10038/optometry/software) > [Sightview](/software/5411/managementplus) # Sightview Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/5411/managementplus Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/5411/managementplus?page=2) > Komplette Softwarelösung für Augenärzte, Augenoptiker und andere Augenheilkundler > > Bewertung: **4.0/5** von 193 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Sightview? Eine cloudbasierte Optometrielösung, die Optiker, Augenärzte und Augenspezialisten bei der Verwaltung von Terminplanung, Abrechnung, POS, Aktendokumentation und bei nutzerdefinierten Berichten, Rückerstattungen und mehr unterstützt. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.0/5** | 193 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Sightview - **Region**: Charlotte, USA - **Gegründet**: 2004 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500 - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Coding-Unterstützung - Diagramm-Erstellung - Dokumentenmanagement - Elektronische Rezepte - Für Optiker - HIPAA konform - Medizinische Abrechnung - Patientenportal - Reklamationsabwicklung - SOAP-Notizen - Self-Service Portal - Terminverwaltung - Versicherungsmanagement - Verwaltung von Patientenakten ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Optiker Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10038/optometry/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Optiker Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10038/optometry/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Ophthalmologie](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32615/ophthalmology-emr/software) ## Alternativen 1. [DrChrono](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/89392/drchrono-practice-management) — 3.9/5 (489 reviews) 2. [NextGen Office](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/31268/nextgen-ambulatory-ehr) — 4.0/5 (1278 reviews) 3. [athenaOne](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/98735/athenaone) — 3.8/5 (907 reviews) 4. [PracticeSuite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/116370/practicesuite) — 4.0/5 (40 reviews) 5. [NueMD](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/72470/nuemd) — 4.4/5 (448 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "ManagementPlus HEALTH ASSISTANCE REVIEW" — 5.0/5 > **franklin** | *21. Juni 2022* | Personalwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: give a complete and effectove Ophthalmological diagnostic. easy ti use ans can be personalize by the user > > **Nachteile**: The softwer is strongly made can't say anything least about ----- ### Nutzerbewertung — 5.0/5 > **Armando** | *5. April 2013* > > I am a both a retina and uveitis specialist; I work in 3 different practices. After experiencing a significant patient volume drop, an increase in wasted time, and complete inefficiency with the EyeMD EHR software that one of the practices I worked for purchased, I was in complete disappointing about the whole idea of EMR. In the 2011 ASRS meeting, I noticed the IO Practice Ware vendor, after a brief demonstration I was almost in tears of emotion as I saw the beauty, ease and efficiency of this system. I decided to choose IO for my other 2 practices and I will tell you why I love it so much\!\!\! The first thing you notice is that it is touch screen, this makes the brain get accustomed to it fast, besides the design is very logical and follows your thought; like the iPhone of EMRs for ophthalmology. The second best thing is that every piece of exam information is on a single screen; you do not have to browse through 20 tabs to find back what the IOP is. The third thing is that it handles images in the PDF format; this is extremely important. Most imaging devices can print, so IO takes a Print to PDF file and uses it as your image file. This makes the program go ultra-fast. The best part of all, you see the images in a second screen while you read in the exam window (like a radiologist). You can open multiple images at once and browse through the PDF image files with extreme speed and ease. No need to wait until anything downloads through the server. I will also mention that E-prescribing with IO is too easy, takes really just a fraction of what it takes to write a prescription with pen and pad (you can technically write a prescription in 3 seconds or less with IO). After a year of using IO I must say, my patient notes are 300% better documented. My referral letters are all on time and take almost no time to create. I am seeing more patients than before IO (this EHR is extremely fast), and my revenue per patient is up as I can now code with confidence, support the codes with multiple diagnoses (chosen by me), the system reminds you when to use modifiers. Their customer support is lovely, they will customize each screen any way I want it to make me even faster. They will solve most problems almost immediately. In summary, I would recommend this software to any retina surgeon or uveitis specialist who is concerned about losing speed or seeing less patients when transitioning to EHR. I love the fact that I use IO, I am very happy for the choice I made. I feel that I have purchased a superior product. ----- ### "MVE is extremely slow. They need to update their server (so my IT guy says )" — 2.0/5 > **Cynthia** | *16. Mai 2019* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 1.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I am now several years into using MVE. I have spent the time to have all of my inventory and my customers info put into the MVE software so I do not want to switch at this busy time. With each upgrade I have been in hopes that MVE would have the slow problem resolved. It is worse than ever. It takes a tremendous amount of time for each page to load and to print pages. I have spent a lot of money on an IT professional to make sure I had my mainframe computer hardwired, that I had the top commercial router and that my wifi speed is at 1000. The problem is within MVE. Trying to communicate with MVE about anything is extremely frustrating. You must make an appointment to speak over the phone. I give MVE an F in customer serverice and product efficiency. > > **Nachteile**: It is so Freaking Slow. I've had two different IT professionals verify that the problem is not with my equipment or my internet provider. > > I went from paper records several years ago to MVE so of course I can say that having records in the computer is fantastic. We are able to market to specific customers, check our inventory count for best selling frames etc. ----- ### "We have been very happy with iO Practiceware" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *3. Juni 2014* > > We are a multi-specialty group that had been using iO Practiceware for almost 3 years. I was initially apprehensive, mainly because of stories I had heard of decreased productivity after adopting EMRs. I have been thrilled to find that the opposite is true. I do believe this success is entirely system-dependent. I ran into a physician that had used iO Practiceware in our office \& then moved out of state to a practice that used another EMR (one which claims to have the highest number of installations in ophthalmology). He was extremely frustrated because after six months, it was still taking him twice as long to enter patient data. The drop down menus in his EMR were very cumbersome. iO Practiceware uses a touchscreen system which is lightning quick \& simple to use. I feel it would be most instructive to list the attributes of iO Practiceware that make it so efficient to use: -The system is well thought-out \& organized. There is an alert button which allows important "notes to self" to be placed on a separate screen. For example, I use a treat \& extend protocol on exudative macular degeneration patients. I have a note in this section indicating the current treatment interval for a given patient. This alert screen can be accessed with a push of a button from any other screen. -The highlights screen is very well organized. It lists the patient's previous procedures \& surgeries. The previous retinal drawing is also shown. From this screen, a chronological list of previous visions \& pressures can be accessed by touching the current vision or pressure on that screen. The font size is very large so that information can be seen at a glance from even 5 feet away. -A separate interpretation \& report for testing such as OCT or FA \& op notes for lasers can be accessed at any time. -Referral letters are easy to generate. They are sent by a simple push of a button. -The system is easily customizable. A computer savvy person can add treatment templates in a matter of minutes. -The monthly maintenance cost is very reasonable compared to other systems. -Service is very personalized. We are usually able to work with the same person on an ongoing basis. -Documentation of patient information is extremely thorough. In fact, a practice consultant who does practice audits remarked that this was the best system she had encountered so far in terms of documentation. ----- ### "EHR review" — 4.0/5 > **David** | *30. März 2024* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Very easy to learn how to use software. Straightforward and intuitive. Very good for entering spectacle Rx information and eyeglass sales > > **Nachteile**: Product is geared more for eyewear than medical applications ----- Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/5411/managementplus?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/5411/managementplus) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten