Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Essential Studio?

Die Essential Studio Enterprise Edition von Syncfusion ist eine Suite von mehr als 1.600 Softwarekomponenten und Frameworks für die Entwicklung von Web-, Mobil- und Desktop-Anwendungen. Die UI-Steuerelemente sind flexibel gestaltet, für hohe Leistung optimiert und werden von mehr als der Hälfte der Fortune 500 verwendet.

Mit Syncfusion in deinem Toolkit kannst du die Erstellung eleganter, moderner Nutzeroberflächen beschleunigen und gängige Dateiformate lesen und schreiben. Und das alles mit der Unterstützung des Support-Teams von Syncfusion.

Wer verwendet Essential Studio?

Syncfusion ist stolz darauf, eine Vielzahl von Kunden zu bedienen, von einzelnen Entwicklern bis hin zu mehr als der Hälfte der Fortune 500-Unternehmen. Unabhängig von deinen Bedürfnissen oder deinem Budget stehen dir die Tools zur Verfügung, die laut Hersteller dein Team zum Erfolg führen.

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Essential Studio das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Essential Studio

Essential Studio

4,4 (514)
395,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
39
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,2 (514)
4,5 (514)
4,7 (514)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
1.295,00 $
Jahr
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
28
3
3,8 (18)
3,4 (18)
3,7 (18)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Essential Studio

Ignite UI
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Felder
Anpassbare Vorlagen
Entwicklung von Web-Apps/mobilen Apps
Kendo UI
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
App-Verwaltung
DevSuite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Dokumentenmanagement
Workflow-Management
iText
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
ApexChat
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Echtzeit-Chat für Kunden
Kundenspezifisches Branding
Vorformulierte Antworten
CanvasJS Charts
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
API
Anpassbares Dashboard
Datenvisualisierung
Microsoft Visual Studio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Debuggen
Grafische Benutzeroberfläche
Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung
DevEX
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Figma
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Design-Management
Drag-and-Drop
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit

Bewertungen über Essential Studio

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,4
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,7
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
55%
4
37%
3
7%
2
0%
1
1%
Ralf
Ralf
Boss in Deutschland
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Essential Studio Rating 1.0

5,0 vor 4 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

Integration of Platform Android, Windows an IOS. The scedular Controller was really the Trigger for me to start. Without it i could Not realise my Project.

Nachteile:

The HTML Editor IS Missing. Webuilt IT with Razor.

Stefano
IT Manager in Italien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Excellent value for money having purchased a Global License

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: I have mainly used Windows Forms tool for desktop app development and ASP.NET MVC, Core and Blazor for Web App. I find that they are very well documented and supported.

Vorteile:

Everything is fine, it is a powerful and complete tool

Nachteile:

There are no major cons that deserves to be reported. The only thing I personally would like which at the moment is missing is the Spreadsheet control as native Blazor control.

Timothy
CEO in USA
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Syncfusion for the StartUp

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: In addition to supporting Xamarin Forms, we are following a strict MVVM methodology and leveraging C# as much as possible across as many platforms as possible. Currently, this includes the most popular standard platforms that Xamarin Forms supports: iOS, Android, UWP. We will also be supporting Blazor (C# in browser web assembly) and one of the Syncfusion features we hope to leverage is their Blazor support. We are waiting for .NET 5 GA to leap into that part of the project, but are hopeful our good experience with Syncfusion componentson Xamarin Forms supported platforms will be matched in the Browser based client using Syncfusion Blazor components.

Vorteile:

Our project is to build a commercial-grade, security-compliant, serverless mobile app platform using only tools that are budget-friendly for startups. Our tool-chain selection includes AWS services (API Gateway, Cognito, Lambda, DynamoDB, ...), Microsoft .NET Core/Standard, Visual Studio and Xamarin. All these tools are essentially free until your app starts scaling. Syncfusion's community edition was chosen because it provides commercial-grade features and doesn't burden the entrepreneur with out-of-pocket expenses until their app is generating revenue. Finally, our experience with Syncfusion's support has been first rate.

Nachteile:

Syncfusion targets many different UI presentation layers. In our case, we use Xamarin Forms which is relatively new for Syncfusion. The controls are generally solid but do require more "code-behind" work than is generally recommended in the Xamarin community. There are shops that totally refuse to allow "any" code-behind and if you are one of those you may have some issues using all of the Syncfusion controls. In our case, the limited code-behind required is not considered a barrier. In addition, the Syncfusion documentation is obviously not written by a native English speaker and as such can be amusing at times and occasionally annoying .

Krunoslav
Developer in Kroatien
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent product

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Vorteile:

I mostly use Blazor, Xamarin a MAUI components. Lot of components, simple to use, lot of examples, excellent documentation and excellent support. It's fascinating that even though I'm using a community license, the support is like having a paid license. Every client is important to them.

Nachteile:

As for the components from Essential Studio, I have no complaints.

Craig
CEO in USA
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

The Best Company in the industry!

5,0 vor 2 Monaten

Vorteile:

I believe Syncfusion was the first company to offer a version that could be used until the company made $1 million. Most companies never reached that mark. Syncfusion provides new companies with the same support received by large corporations. Syncfusion has not yet received a dime, and I will happily pay whatever the cost is when the product starts generating income. Also, I have seen third-party tool kits come and go. Syncfusion is here for the “long haul”. For me, the thing that sets Syncfusion apart from any other company is the support. I can honestly say that I have received the best I have ever experienced. My earliest experiences with support were because of my lack of C# knowledge. At the beginning of the project, I had experience with every major language except C#. But having the Windows, backend, and mobile apps written in different languages added a complexity that made it unbearable to work with. C# (and .net) was available through all the required. Some of my initial support requests were because I misunderstood the C# language concerning the tools. However, I was using some tools in a way they weren’t meant to be used. I also did this with AWS and AWS support (which I paid for) argued that no one would do what I was doing and they won’t support it. I had to show them their documentation which proved what I was doing should work. They did fix it. Syncfusion support just requested a code sample and saw that although I was doing it something unconventional, it should work. And they fixed the code ! They fix the code for me in two or three different places. They even provided me custom patched code before an actual tested release.

Nachteile:

I have not experienced any cons. All support expectations were met. Development continues etc.