Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden
Praxis EMR
Was ist Praxis EMR?
Praxis ist eine preisgekrönte KI-basierte EMR/EHR, die keine umständlichen Vorlagen enthält. Vorlagen verlangsamen das Festhalten von Informationen und beeinträchtigen die Qualität der Medizin. Stattdessen verwendet Praxis künstliche Intelligenz (KI), die von jedem/r Nutzer*in lernt. Ärzt*innen zeichnen mithilfe der Anwendung schneller auf, verbessern die medizinische Qualität und sparen durchschnittlich zweieinhalb Stunden pro Tag. Praxis wird von Ärzt*innen als Nummer eins in Bezug auf Zufriedenheit und Nutzerfreundlichkeit eingestuft, darunter Nummer eins bei der AmericanEHR der ACP und Nummer eins in der AAFP-Umfrage zur Nutzerzufriedenheit bei Ärzt*innen, die die EHR gewechselt haben.
Wer verwendet Praxis EMR?
Praxis bedient unabhängige Ärzt*innen und kleine bis mittelgroße Kliniken in allen Fachbereichen sowie angegliederte Krankenhauskliniken, IPAs und ACOs.
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Praxis EMR das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Praxis EMR
Bewertungen über Praxis EMR
Manual Artificial intelligence
Kommentare:
As a 24 year user (since 2000), the product have improved leaps and bounds. This product I call a manual AI and have endless capability and development. While a majority of my colleagues are BURNED out as documented by numerous articles and a recent publication by AMA we see almost half of physicians planning to exit within 2 years [sensitive content hidden]
, I continue to be OPTIMISTIC and feel like I am just starting. This technology tool is really mind boggling. As a Geriatrician Internist handling complicated multiple medical issues Praxis gives me supreme confidence and satisfaction on what I do. WE ALSO consistently score within the top 1 to 3 in our quality measures in our network because of Praxis
Vorteile:
I am a user since 2000 though the product was bought in 1999. It can efficiently record and document information better than Nabla or a background recorder.
Nachteile:
None worth mentioning at this time . I had seen demos from other EMR's such as Athena, Ambient AI like Nabla and I am done with documentation using Praxis immediately. As predicted with this product I am capable even increasing my patient load 25 to 30%.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Non-Template Based EMR that is customizable just for my needs
Kommentare: I was in a group practice for 5 years until I resigned last September. During the 5 years in my former group, I was burdened by using E-clinical works - a template based EMR that I absolutely loathed. As an epileptologist, many of my cases have complicated neurological histories that do not necessary fit with a template based EMR documatation. In addition, many of my orders are the same for each patient yet, with E clinical works, I would have to click on the same orders over and over again - wasting time that would accrue over the busy day. Some of the layout of my notes was confusing with a lot of extraneous information added to notes automatically - that had no bearing on the patient care. When I started my new practice, I absolutely did not want to have a template-based system. Lo and behold, I came across Praxis. When I did the demo, it was great that Dr. Loh himself (the CEO and a fellow physician) showed me many of the unique features of Praxis. For the most part, I am so impressed by the concept processor in that many of my cases are somewhat similar to each other in terms of the orders. If I see a case, I automatically just click on the assessment that I have set up for other similar cases and boom - my note automatically populates with the wording and phrasology that I would normally use. I just have to modify some of the details and I save a lot of time this way than having to write the same history over and over again - as I did with Eclinical works.
Vorteile:
- Ease of Use - Customizable - Saves Time I am very happy with the template-free service. The cost is less than other EMRs (though this is not all in one EHR - I use Open Practice Solutions/Open PM as a practice management system that easily integrates with Praxis - still saving compared to Athena or other comprehensive EHR systems). Customer service is second to none especially with the initial "go live" team.
Nachteile:
nothing so far. I am very happy with Praxis at this time.
Great EHR!
Vorteile:
As a Medical billing company, it is great to be able to have my customers referred to a cost effective and easy to use platform for their EHR. The interface works amazing and it helps the providers focus more on the patient.
Nachteile:
I have othing negative to say. All has been great to work with.
The Ultimate EMR
Kommentare: Praxis: Easy to implement. Easy to learn. Easy to use. Easy to comply with MIPS and MACRA requirements. Saves time and allows us to practice quality medicine.
Vorteile:
I have been in practice for the last 27 years and Praxis is my 4th EMR and so far the best one. Praxis is very affordable which is very important for smaller practices. Starting from an implementation to training, Praxis team was exceptional. Having a designated contact person was very helpful during the first few months to help resolve any unexpected issues in a timely manner. Learning curve with Praxis is much gentler and easier compared to other EMRs. Praxis allows you to document the way your mind thinks and practice the way you once dreamed about. Praxis will allow you to provide quality care and meet all necessary guidelines which will result in better reimbursement over time.
Nachteile:
Lack of its own faxing solution and hope that Praxis will have its own integrated faxing solution in future
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Updated Praxis Review
Kommentare: Being a direct primary care practice, Praxis allowed great flexibility with documentation with the practice.
Vorteile:
Software adapts each time you use it, learning from each note. Very attentive customer support. User friendly and intuitive. Personalized notes without templates. Great for DPC practices who don't need practice management software.
Nachteile:
I can't think of any negatives, it works well across all types of practices.