Durchschnittliche Bewertung

26 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 3.7 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 3 / 5
  • Kundenservice 3.4 / 5
  • Funktionen 3.8 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 3.2 / 5

Produktinformationen

  • Startpreis 940,00 $
  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Gratis Testen Ja
  • Einsatz Installiert - Mac
    Cloud, SaaS, Web
    Installiert - Windows
  • Training Webinare
    Dokumentation
  • Kundenbetreuung Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • IBM
  • http://www.ibm.com
  • Gegründet 1911

Über IBM Rational

Verbessere die Rentabilität softwareintensiver Produkte oder Services, steigere die IT-Produktivität und senke die Gemeinkosten.

IBM Rational Funktionen

  • Aufgabenmanagement
  • Berichterstattung
  • Kollaboration
  • Priorisierung
  • Stakeholderdefinierte Attribute
  • Statusverfolgung
  • Veränderungsmanagement
  • Aufgabenmanagement
  • Filtern
  • Problem-Nachverfolgung
  • Release-Management
  • Rückstand-Management
  • Ticket-Management
  • Workflow-Management

Alternative Produkte

Ähnliche Produkte

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für IBM Rational

Complete, feature rich, requirements management software

Bewertet am 12.2.2019
Verifizierter Rezensent
Software Team Lead
Medizinische Geräte, 10.001+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: DOORS, once learned, is a powerful and critical tool for defining requirements, maintaining requirements, as well as tracing to verification and validation. It is an essential tool for engineering development in any regulated industry.

Vorteile: DOORS is the most complete and most widely used requirements management software. For medical devices, as well as other highly regulated industries, requirements management is a critical business function. DOORS provides the functionality, traceability, and validity to manage requirements and produce the documentation needed to meet the regulations. DOORS features reduce the risk of missing key requirements, verifications, validations, as well as the flexibility to understand the project as a whole. Managing cross functional reviews of requirements, multiple stakeholders, as well as linked requirements is a huge task that DOORS makes possible with minimal errors. A huge challenge in requirements management is traceability. Tracing requirements to verification, validation, as well as risk analysis, can be very confusing and is prone to errors, but with DOORS these connections can be explicitly defined, and reports or trace documents can be created directly. Also, DOORS scripting allows users to create output documents which can be used as artifacts for the quality system, and shared directly with regulators during audit and for regulatory submissions.

Nachteile: DOORS has an extensive feature set that covers the whole requirements process. However, these features are not always intuitive to learn. It takes experience to master all of the functionality, and it takes time to become a DOORS master. This is a massive software tool, extensive training or first-hand experience is necessary before it can be used to its full potential.

The standard for systems engineering artifact creation - but not the easiest to use.

Bewertet am 20.4.2018
Daniel A.
Systems Engineer / Analyst
Verteidigung & Raumfahrt, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
2 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: The ability to use DOORS databases from existing projects, and incorporate model-based systems engineering workflow using MagicDraw is tremendously valuable, but if DOORS isn't a central requirement, I do prefer the Vitech CORE and Genesys offerings for fixed scale applications, and vastly prefer Innoslate for Enterprise and Cloud solutions where concurrent engineering is valuable.

Vorteile: The ubiquitous capability within the DOORS toolset is undeniable, and the interface with MagicDraw enables useful systems engineering artifacts to be created with ease. The integrated nature of the entire Rational suite is actually very robust, and if working with a legacy project where DOORS is implemented, MagicDraw can be tremendously helpful in converting larger spreadsheet flavored artifacts into something actually parse-able to most human brains.

Nachteile: Ease of use is the biggest limitation, particularly with doors. An indirect side benefit of having a large database in DOORS is that configuration management occurs indirectly because only a small number of people can properly execute a change, therefore version control happens because only one (or maybe two) person is actually inputting the information.
The flexibility in MagicDraw is somewhat limited, even with some creative metamodel application. Not a massive drawback or worth looking elsewhere as a singular cause, but it is a capability limitation in some instances.
Value is the other serious drawback - to implement the full Rational suite is actually a solid chunk of change, and to really get full utility out of the entire IBM Rational package, at least two applications are requisite (unless you are a DOORS specialist, in which case my express condolences go out to you). The value proposition of Vitech offerings, and for anybody looking to use OML the much better value of Innoslate really are the reason I use the IBM Rational toolkit sparingly, and only when somebody else is footing the bill.

Rational Tool Concert (RTC)

Bewertet am 24.2.2017
Bronwyn G.
Consulting PM and coach
Bildungsmanagement, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
3 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: RTC is a highly configurable enterprise wide large scale tool for supporting initial engagement of ideas that can be distilled down into epics, features, stories and tasks.. Configure the level of granularity and what you want to capture at each level with highly customised forms to capture requirements and track through to build. Not so suitable for developers who find the burden of forms and multiple screens for data capture annoying. RTC is great through initiation, planning, and testing. Also great for real time report dashboards and has preloaded a number of report types, charts, pie, bar etc for building informative dashboards. Take care to establish initial configuration approach and data structure before creating forms and onboarding people as it is hard to correct sttucture changes. It does require a dedicated config person initially and support staff. Deployed in IBM, Telstra, NBN to give you an idea of scale

Vorteile: Highly configurable. Strong work flow. Real time dashboard. Audit history. Can attach files. Good security profile management. Scaleable, flexible, powerful

Nachteile: Requires config, training and support staff. Licenses are expensive

Obsolete interface, but does the job

Bewertet am 9.3.2018
Verifizierter Rezensent
Software Developer
13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
3/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
2 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Vorteile: Used to track software change and support requests in a highly regulated environment. Bland integration with Source Code Management systems, supports attachments, notes and estimations.
Nice search/query tools and good configurability. There are way worse tools out there...

Nachteile: Maybe not in the latest versions, but the interface is old and text fields won't stretch. If you have some longer text you'll better copy/paste from a proper text editor. Integration with Source Code Management is achieved with a java tool that breaks if there are particular characters in tickets names, and forces to search and click the ticket at every source code check-in. The integration is nothing more than copying the commit log in a section of the ticket. Licenses are probably expensive, because we often reach the maximum number of concurrent (logged in) users and that means you can't use the software. You have to log out and retry. Session duration hence is short and even if you're logged in, you can't click a link to a ticket, it opens another window that's not logged in.

Powerful tool if you have the expertise

Bewertet am 4.12.2019
Bruce F.
IT Admin
Bildungsmanagement, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
2 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
2 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: It does what we needed from it but looking for a more modern tool that can connect to new software and that more people are familiar with.

Vorteile: It has everything you want from it, manages projects, business rules, defects, traces items from tests, track tests. It keeps all you need linked together and can produce reports to help read all that data. There are dash boards to follow tasks at a glance.

Nachteile: You need someone who is familiar with the tool to install and configure it. Setup of the tool after it is done needs training with IBM. It is expensive for what it is. The software is picky about where it is and we have four VMs that have to run all the parts of it. Upgrading java has rendered the system useless before.

Lies weitere Bewertungen