Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Cerner Ambulatory EHR?

Cerners PowerChart Ambulatory EHR stellt sicher, dass die richtigen Ärzt*innen die richtigen Informationen zur richtigen Zeit und am richtigen Ort haben und die bestmöglichen Entscheidungen treffen können. Mit Informationstechnologie und Koordination wird die Gesundheitsfürsorge sicherer, effektiver und für Gemeinden weltweit verfügbar.

Wer verwendet Cerner Ambulatory EHR?

Ärzt*innen, Krankenpfleger*innen und Administrator*innen in der Arztpraxis, ambulante Dienstleistungen.

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Cerner Ambulatory EHR das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Cerner Ambulatory EHR

Cerner Ambulatory EHR

3,8 (154)
25,00 $
Jahr
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
33
Keine Integrationen gefunden
3,4 (154)
3,4 (154)
3,6 (154)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
35
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,0 (361)
4,0 (361)
4,2 (361)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Cerner Ambulatory EHR

EpicCare
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
HIPAA konform
Kundenportal
CPSI EHR
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Entscheidungsunterstützung
Klinik-Interoperabilität
Helix
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
MedEZ
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
RXNT
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Elektronische Rezepte
Elektronische Unterschrift
HIPAA konform
PracticeSuite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Fernbehandlungspläne
Patientenweiterbildung
Textnachrichtenversand
Qualifacts Insync
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
HIPAA konform
Reklamationsabwicklung
Nextech EHR & PM
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
HIPAA konform
Patienten-Terminplanung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
PrognoCIS
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Bestätigung / Erinnerungen
Zahlungsabwicklung
Übungs-Management

Bewertungen über Cerner Ambulatory EHR

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
3,8
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,4
Kundenservice
3,6
Funktionen
3,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,4

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
26%
4
40%
3
23%
2
4%
1
6%
KRENCISWEL
KRENCISWEL
Medical Laboratory Scientist in Katar
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Less paperwork, less patient waiting time, efficient and accurate management of samples through the use of barcode system within the software.

Vorteile:

I have been working with cerner powerchart since 2016 and it has been very helpful with managing patient orders specially with regards to clinical laboratory test orders. It is very organized and all clinical orders are separated by classification. It has decreased the patient waiting time and processing time for the lab where I am working. Overall its very helpful to medical professionals like me.

Nachteile:

There is really no cons for this software. Occassional downtime, updates and server problems but those were just minor technical difficulties. And are always adressed by the support team efficiently.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Makes things easy

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: It is a great place to compile all records and look up patient information when needed. It has helped me stay on track with clinic notes.

Vorteile:

I like that Cerner is transparent enough so that nothing is too hard to figure out. I am able to find patients easily, write clinic notes easily, and view past records easily.

Nachteile:

You can only see up to 500 records before things start to disappear. I do not like this. Additionally, it can be hard to find certain records, perhaps a search bar within the records would make things easier.

lang
Physician in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Cerner just living off old software and the name

1,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: Horrible, their IT will blame and make excuses of why the product fails to live up to its reputation. They hire kids that have no right being in IT/system analyst, coders, etc. They all use this a way into the field and no nothing about coding even for the most basic things required in documentation i.e. Fishbone labs, smart templates(all show not aligned, no data, etc.) The problems are so signifcant that they can't possibly be overcome.

Vorteile:

Nothing not one single good thing that I can say about Cerner products or the corporation. It seems that there are a lot of reviews from people who have never actually used the product or are required to use the product daily. I feel like these review are useless because they allow a clerk to front desk person to comment and that comment holds just as much weight as the provider/physian responsible for documenting, ordering, etc. that actually has a license on the line.

Nachteile:

Everything: The power chart templates are useless, the labs are horrible on interoperability(getting outside labs to pull into results review), workflows lack vision on what is needed and how to view it in a timely manner, the powerforms/powernotes are just as useless. The system is lightyears behind less expensive products. Our current system is has been updated 3 times and still doesn't even have ICD 10 codes correctly entered making my job 10 times harder, ICD 10 codes went into affect >5 years ago and we are still dealing with extensive problems. Its just horrible that Cerner doesnt have one actual physician on staff to guide them in what is needed in daily charting on a patient. The orders fall off after 1 yr from the MAR to where pharmacy can't bill requiring providers to have to cancel and reorder every 6 months to prevent reimbursement problems. This becomes a safety issue and if anyone was actually regulating these EMR's they would be shut down immediately for concerns of patient safety.

Ethan
Pharmacist in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner PowerChart Review

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overal Cerner PowerChart satisfies electronic medical record needs well with a few areas of improvement. I am not involved with EMR purchasing decisions but from what I understand, Cerner PowerChart is a good product for the money.

Vorteile:

Cerner PowerChart provides a comprehensive location for all medical information. Information display can be customized to fit user needs and provides quick access to pertinent info with continued use. Home screens are customized for each particular practitioners credentials and needs making many commonly used tasks always right at hand. Accessing information from other visits is also easily performed regardless of which encounter the patient was initially pulled up. One of my favorites is the results callback functionality that allows easy review of discharged patients culture results.

Nachteile:

While Cerner is not difficulty to use, not all features are entirely intuitive. Many functions require repeated use and lots of clicking to access and perform relatively simple tasks. While there is a quick link for Meds Manager access for pharmacists, the link does not pull up the current patient profile opened, necessitating re-entering of the patient encounter number which is a bit tedious. Additionally, the disjunction between FirstNet and PowerChart is inconvenient and would be nice if charts opened through FirstNet opened PowerChart rather than a separate entity of FirstNet given the difference in functionality between the two programs.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

harder to get used to after using EPIC for EHRs

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I learned to use it and I think with more time I will get better as always, but the learning curve was a bit different from EPIC charting which seemed to be more color coded, and easier to navigate, but also full of facility wide things that had to be filled out but didn't apply to the patient, so that was cumbersome.

Vorteile:

It is easy to use once you get to know where things are located, but it has more of a windows software feel than a mac software. It is more utilitarian in that it is not colored and the font is small, which is good for efficiency in documenting once you know where things go and are located. Does not have hangups that EPIC has when company wide documenting is required for certain areas that sometimes do not apply to particular patient such as was the case on a pediatric floor where I was using this system and I appreciated not having EPIC.

Nachteile:

Hard to get used to. I was coming from using EPIC mostly, which seems easier and more intuitive to learn. I found the smaller black boxes and hidden tabs harder to get used to when trying to document daily things. As a nurse the med administration tab wasn't as easy to use as it is in EPIC and wasn't as intuitive and I sometimes messed up at first in documenting med administration especially when trying to add something that wasn't scanning from the pharmacy and I had to do an override.