Storyblok

Power while being simple with a flexible platform that has a rich editor and headless features

Kommentare: storybook can be a great option for creating and producing content for developing companies and startups. Because it has a lot of flexibility for both developers and users. The headless feature of this CMS is very valuable for developers and teamwork, it speeds up the operation and can be used to operate a new digital platform. You can easily generate and manage any type of content for any device. Content personalization is available due to the modular content of the blocks and the features and tools of this platform.

Vorteile:

Generating content for an international audience through Storyblok’s internationalization and localization tools is so easy for our team. We’ve accessed our data via a meaningful GraphQL API. Also, I like StoryBlok’s Intelligence in producing and auto converting content to responsive pages and visible on all devices with any page size and resolution.

Nachteile:

The development team is constantly making useful changes, and everything will be better if they develop UI.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Contentstack, Joomla und Duda

Warum Storyblok gewählt wurde: For teamwork and simultaneous project development, looking for a multi-purpose CMS with headless capability was our best choice for switching.

Zuvor genutzte Software: Drupal, Pantheon, Laserfiche, Conga Contracts und WordPress

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Storyblok: We reviewed the demo version and satisfied the simplicity and quick response and compatibility, and considered this CMS the best option.

Balances developer friendly feature with content editors needs well

Kommentare: Very productive CMS to work with. Good for small or large projects alike.

Vorteile:

Ease of use, flexibility, just the right balance of developer convention with UI admin configuration.

Nachteile:

A “disable block” button as a native feature. Right now one must delete a block to make it disappear it would be useful to disable with a clear disabled UI style.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Sanity

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Storyblok: Price, features, ease of developer onboarding

Do not waste your resources on this software. It's filled with critical bugs.

Vorteile:

It's hard to like something when nothing seems to work and you waste countless time and other resources on it.

Nachteile:

This product has cost our business countless hours and resources in implementation due to its unparalleled level of bugs. They have a V1 and V2 beta. However, neither V1 or V2 work. Both our team of editors and developers have been rage clicking the platform for weeks now, trying their best to implement it, only to be met with one bug after another. This is expensive software and there are far better options than this. Don't waste your time and resources like we have.

Most customisable, user friendly software for content management of all kinds ! Try today

Kommentare: Good so far. Loved the features though it needs lot of improvement in experience . High reliability due to its easy to adapt features and user experience. Quite manageable and keep coming with novel features. High reliability on editing and formatting services of content.

Vorteile:

Story and content management through customised software in easiest way Tech savvy and user friendly softwrae. Everyone can use and operate the same at all the times. Highly stable across all kinds of business environments One of the smallest tools to create and manage content services for all the businesses. Cost optimization is achieved within 6 months of its usage

Nachteile:

There is more of manual clicking on its interface. Any small change request took their business team several days to resolve and stablise the software. We are using library editor for editing purpose. It often hangs and does not save changes while operation Interface experience could be further improved to next level.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Kentico, CUE Content Hub, Contentstack und Contentful

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Storyblok: Storyblok was chosen above all due to its low cost and cost optimization feature for organization. We do not face any trouble while deploying the software across nay business vertical neither any integration issues. Stability is there which results in more dependability and customer wants to stick to the software and doe not want to change the services or jump to another vendor. Quite satisfied overall with services and offerings. Content development is going to next level of quality assurance with Storyblok.

I would love to feel more empowered as a developer.

Vorteile:

The documentation is easy to follow – most of our team had not issue grasping the concepts, interface and provided tooling. The tutorials continue to be helpful for us, when new developers join our team. Where the documentation is unclear, the costumer service is able to clarify.

Nachteile:

Assets cannot be scheduled for release, like content entries are. This is inconveniencing. I often find myself feeling disappointed with the features on content delivery APIs (REST & GraphQL). Most recent example is that most of the available filters can only perform operations where "filter = X OR Y". I would, at least expect that we're able to query the api based on "filter = X AND Y" While sparring with my clients or peers I always push for solutions that do not involve "custom fields", "sidebar apps", etc. To me, it feels too much effort for too little in return because the "ecosystem" is closed. In these moments I often find myself wishing for a dedicated API just for the web interface, instead of what is provided now.