--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Ansys medini analyze zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ansys medini analyze Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](/directory/31299/safety-management/software) > [Ansys medini analyze](/software/210125/ansys-medini-analyze) # Ansys medini analyze Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/210125/ansys-medini-analyze Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/210125/ansys-medini-analyze?page=2) > ANSYS medini analyze implementiert wichtige Sicherheitsanalysemethoden (HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study), FTA (Fault Tree Analysis), FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis), FMEDA (Failure Mode Effect and Diagnostic Analysis)) in einem integrierten Tool. > > Bewertung: **4.0/5** von 23 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Ansys medini analyze? Fluidingenieure, Verbrennungsingenieure, Wärmeingenieure und Aerodynamikingenieure. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.0/5** | 23 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Ansys - **Gegründet**: 1970 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Vorfall-Berichterstattung - Workflow-Konfiguration ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31299/safety-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31299/safety-management/software) - [Reporting-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30053/reporting/software) - [Workflow Management Systeme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [SiteDocs](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/143579/sitedocs) — 4.8/5 (241 reviews) 2. [Workhub](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/137350/safetysync) — 4.5/5 (127 reviews) 3. [ecoPortal](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/121927/ecoportal) — 4.6/5 (53 reviews) 4. [SafetyCulture](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (253 reviews) 5. [EcoOnline](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/127198/ecompliance-safety-software) — 4.6/5 (123 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Easy to use and understand for other engineering functions" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *19. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: So clear understanding report outs. Other functions can understand contributions and results as well. > > **Nachteile**: Lite version can be developed to gain time for modeling. Library development can be added. ----- ### "Ideal tool for FS" — 5.0/5 > **Ludwig** | *11. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The possibility to develop the complete product lifecycle for FS, CS and SOTIF > > **Nachteile**: There is no straight way to follow the V-cycle process. It is required to jump from a project item to another one continuously to fulfill all the docs > > It takes time to learn but it is easy to maintain and complete the required documents ----- ### "HQN review of Medini Analyze" — 3.0/5 > **Hung** | *24. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We use all features of Functional Safety analysis. Medini allows us to have all these analysis to be coherently located in a single model. The tool is relatively easy to use. But, create templates to tailor the tool to our existing process is challenging if not impossible without expert help from Ansys. Currently, we cannot integrate Medini with our other tools except by exporting/importing via MS Excel or MS Word. And, this process is cumbersome and prone to errors. > > **Nachteile**: Limited SysML capability to model Systems/Items and Functional Safety work products in Medini. > > We are using Medini to implement our Functional Safety Process. Overall, the tools is acceptable. It gets the jobs done with ad hoc works-around that must be manually recreated in different models. Should use SysML or at least UML as template in the same fashion as Sparx System's Enterprise Architect or IBM's Rhapsody. ----- ### "Ansys medini analyze review from a safety and security user point of view" — 4.0/5 > **Samuele** | *12. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The most impactful features are the possibility to manage most of the safety life development of a product inside a single tool. Is possible to define an item definition, HARA, derive SG, create functional safety and technical safety concepts, link requirements, perform FMEA, FMEDA, FTA. All in a single environmel and with deep in treacibility. From last version it also features security actvitity. It also integrable with other company tool beacuse it support othe rrequirement managent tool import export (for example Doors). > > **Nachteile**: BIRT, the add in integrated to create custom report template, is not easy to use and require some javascript programming knowledge. The user manual of BIRT contains very minimal informations and the only source of help is the Medini forum. > > The expereience is good. We now use it to speed up functional safety and cybersecurity activities for various projects. ----- ### "Goiing Good and Need Improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Tony** | *9. Dezember 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: it covers most of the safety activities and a change done in one activity could reflect on other levels/ activities too. > > **Nachteile**: Tool take more memory and hangs a lot. Also Medini dont have user friendly options, compare to the classic tools we used for analysis, in particularly where FMEA/FMEDAs even a copy paste is not supported. > > The idea is good to have all safety activities in the same tool. still Medini have many blockings for new users, where they feel more easy on the old classic tools than Medini. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/210125/ansys-medini-analyze?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/210125/ansys-medini-analyze) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten