Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Was ist ZeuZ?

ZeuZ ist ein cloudbasiertes und On-Premise-fähiges, DevOps-fähiges und KI-unterstütztes Framework für Automatisierungstests. Der skriptlose und einfach zu bedienende Testerstellungsprozess ermöglicht es jedem, anspruchsvolle Workflows für Web, Mobile, Desktop, APIs, IoT (Internet of Things) und Cloud-Dienste zu erstellen und zu testen.

Tester und Entwickler können automatisierte Tests in einem beliebigen Browser erstellen und diese lokal oder aus der Ferne ausführen. Sie können diese Tests parallel auf iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge und vielen mehr planen oder ausführen.

Wer verwendet ZeuZ?

Da ZeuZ die am einfachsten zu bedienende automatisierte Testplattform ist, kann jeder in wenigen Minuten komplexe Workflows erstellen. Der Kundenkreis reicht von Start-ups wie KeyFree bis hin zu großen Unternehmen wie BlackBerry.

ZeuZ Software - 1
ZeuZ Software - 2
ZeuZ Software - 3
ZeuZ Software - 4

Du bist nicht sicher, ob ZeuZ das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

ZeuZ

ZeuZ

4,9 (13)
200,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
102
6
4,6 (13)
5,0 (13)
4,9 (13)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
15,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
19
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,4 (20)
4,2 (20)
4,5 (20)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu ZeuZ

Kualitee
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Squish
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Katalon Studio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anforderungsbasiertes Testen
Verschieben und kopieren
hierarchische Ansicht
TestProject
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anforderungsbasiertes Testen
Anforderungsmanagement
Parametrisierte Tests
Leapwork
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Parametrisierte Tests
Testskript-Bewertungen
Unterstützt parallele Ausführung
Perfecto
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aktivitäts-Dashboard
Anpassbare Berichte
Berichterstattung und Statistik
Ranorex Studio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anforderungsbasiertes Testen
Parametrisierte Tests
Zephyr Enterprise
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anforderungsbasiertes Testen
Anforderungsmanagement
Unterstützt parallele Ausführung
Applitools
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.

Bewertungen über ZeuZ

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,9
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,6
Kundenservice
4,9
Funktionen
5,0
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5,0

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
92%
4
8%
Zoheil
Zoheil
QA & Release Manager in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Automotive, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Fantastic software at a great price

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Zeuz has helped and is helping us transform our testing capabilities from a fully manual set up to an automated approach. This helped us improve the quality of our software and safe valuable resource time on other tasks.
Zeuz also provides fully trained testing experts at an additional cost that is definitely worth it as the resource is highly capable and provides great extra coverage to our testing needs.
The produce is very easy to use and best of all it can do so much - it really is a comprehensive tool that can cater to all possible testing needs of a company.

Vorteile:

- wide range of features/uses - built to be used in the most smart/efficient way - lots of integrations and possibilities - works for web, mobile and native apps - extremely competent staff

Nachteile:

The software keeps improving and I've seen several updates whilst working with Zeuz already.

Alon
CTO in UK
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Very good and effective product

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Intuitive and clever product that allowed us to convert most of our manual tests very quick and to add much more tests. When we were looking for a product for automated testing we selected ZeuZ after having few meetings with their Sales and MD, and we were convinced this is the product for us.We got a very good support for the ZeuZ team through the adoption of the product and we are very impressed with the results of what was achieved since we took onboard the product.Having identified small bugs and reported them to the support team, they were fixed within a day!We are using 2 resources from ZeuZ to build tests with our teams and they are very good.

Vorteile:

- Intuitive and user friendly- Robust- Versatile- Support team- Testing experts- Price

Nachteile:

The UX could be a bit better, but with the constant updates done by the ZeuZ team, we think it won't take long before it would be improved.

Neil
President in Kanada
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly responsive

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

NVP Software Solutions is in the business of evaulating Testing Life Cycles and managing large test projects. As such our main interest is in the ability to report progress and ensure stakeholders are kept informed of testing progress. Our interest in ZeuZ is to provide a platform to our clients to help them in their automation. The fact that everything is in a database (unlike some other products) means that almost any report can be generated.

Nachteile:

Interface is still evolving. Need to make sure that existing functionality is not lost.

Nii-Narh
Director in Kanada
Telekommunikation, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great fora range of people, those who are not technical all the way to expert/Dev teams.

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We are a small company which is based online, our website and app was going through development slowly due to bugs and development issues. We asked some other companies about website and software testing but the price was astronomical. We came upon Automation Solutionz and had a demo with there team, at first it looked too complex and built for large corporations and enterprises. With very little training we realized how simple it was to use the software and even used their Project Management section. The ZeuZ software helped us save on cost and do things that a small company like ours would never have thought possible.

Vorteile:

- Tested our Android app, Apple app, and website using the same test cases - No coding was necessary for our testing needs - Easy to change test cases when we changed our process flow - Cut down our development time saving us on cost - Ran daily automated test sets - Streamlined our bug fixes - Very short ROI - Used the ZeuZ Project Management to run our development and daily company activities

Nachteile:

- As a small company, at first it was daunting to use ZeuZ, but within a matter of hours it was easy to use for even our non-technical people. - Moved our development over to the ZeuZ project management, for our small company at first the implementation was difficult but that was not because of the software.

Daniel
Software Developer in Kanada
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent Software Testing Tool for both QA and Devs

5,0 vor 10 Monaten

Kommentare: My overall experience with ZeuZ was positive. The [sensitive content hidden] is quick to resolve any issues, and is open to feedback. While many of the reviewers here may be on the QA side of a software team, I think from a developer standpoint, ZeuZ is a phenomenal testing software to use, and can really reduce the number of bugs.

Vorteile:

My favorite things about ZeuZ include its integration with 3rd party apps, the support from the team, and the document storage. As a developer, there wasn't a need to run ZeuZ testcases, as that was not my job. ZeuZ shined with CI/CD, where it would immediately tell me if a build failed due to bad or incorrect code. Having this immediate feedback improved developer speed, since there was no need to wait for a failure to be flagged once QA started testing our new builds at the end of sprints. Every commit and every push is able to be configured in a way that ZeuZ will take and perform the important tests, and even a regression test if possible. The [sensitive content hidden] is quick in providing help and is able to integrate all these third party applications, and has an excellent team of offshore testers that respond quickly and were very helpful. Working with the ZeuZ team is a pleasure- they can back the product up very well, through demos, integrations, and product questions. Another great thing was the integration with mattermost using webhooks- as builds were tested on ZeuZ, the results would get spit back to the main communication channel used by the entire company. This meant that developer's didn't need to spend time going into the ZeuZ UI, finding the test, and parsing its results- since the results were already in a digestible and clean format. The ZeuZ ui is great for QA and testers, but speaking for many developers, it contains information that isn't as particularly useful as it was to the QA team- so having the important information was key. This integration, alone, managed to speed up developer efficiency and reduce bugs during each sprint. Last, one important thing to note was the document storage. Depending on the application you run, this may not be as important, but this was an excellent tool for my company. ZeuZ can store testcases and mock data used inside of its server, which allowed me to grab edge test cases quickly, and test these before pushing code, which in turn, also led to less bugs at the end of each sprint when making changes or adding new features.

Nachteile:

As a developer, there weren't many issues using ZueZ. I had no problems finding information I needed, and I never ran into any issues with software. I think the main points would be a nicer UI, along with stronger version control system where data is stored.