Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Harness?

Mit Harness können DevOps- und Software-Ingenieure CD-Pipelines auf einfache, skalierbare und sichere Weise selbst erstellen. Lasse Skriptarbeit für immer hinter dir, indem du Harness CD für Rolling-, Blue-Green- oder Canary-Bereitstellungen verwendest. Reduziere das Sicherheitsrisiko und bestehe Audits mit fein abgestimmter RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) und vollständigen Audit-Trails problemlos. Integration in Enterprise-Monitoring-Lösungen für automatisierte Bereitstellungsverifizierung und Rollback.

Wer verwendet Harness?

Harness bietet Engineering- und DevOps-Teams in allen Branchen und mit allen Reifegraden eine einfache und sichere Möglichkeit, das Erstellen und Testen von Softwareartefakten zu beschleunigen.

Harness Software - 1
Harness Software - 2
Harness Software - 3
Harness Software - 4
Harness Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Harness das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Harness

Harness

4,5 (32)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
55
20
4,4 (32)
4,4 (32)
4,8 (32)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
29,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
64
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,4 (1.101)
4,5 (1.101)
4,2 (1.101)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Harness

GitLab
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Authentifizierung
Quellkontrolle
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Jira
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Agile Methodiken
Aufgabenmanagement
Projektplanung/Terminierung
groundcover
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Echtzeit-Daten
Echtzeit-Monitoring
Buildkite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datenvisualisierung
Debuggen
Ereignisprotokolle
Jenkins
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung
Kontinuierliche Lieferung
Pipeline-Management
GitHub
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Quellkontrolle
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
CircleCI
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung
Kontinuierliche Lieferung
Unterstützt parallele Ausführung
CodeNOW
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Cloud Computing
Einsatz-Management
Unterstützt zahlreiche Programmiersprachen
Caspio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datenmigration
Projektplanung/Terminierung
Workflow-Management

Bewertungen über Harness

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,8
Funktionen
4,4
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
59%
4
34%
3
3%
2
3%
Renan
Renan
Sales engineer in Brasilien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

The mostly integrated CI/CD tool

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

The tool is completely integrated with other devop tools, making easy to work and deploy what you need and if someone goes wrong he will told you too.

Nachteile:

The tool is upgrading and developing more features day after day and some functions isn’t finished yet

Joshua
Senior DevOps Engineer in USA
Finanzdienstleistungen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Harness for the win!

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: From shopping to inception it's been an absolute blast. Lucky, [SENSITIVE CONTENT] have helped every step of the way to transition to the dumpster fire of Jenkins we had, to the new hotness for our CI/CD.

Vorteile:

1) It's not Jenkins, 2) ease of use and setup 3) empowerment for developers to be self service 4) pipeline and workflow malleability 5) no plugins to maintain 6)not jenkins

Nachteile:

Only con is their can be some feature requests to be done (non product impacting) but, they jump right on those. It's pretty cool to grow with harness. That's literally the only thing I can think of.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Program has a strong point in strategic development tasks.

4,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: Although it handles several deployment volumes at the same time, I would say that it is missing something to surpass the previous programs that I have mentioned, perhaps a more refined solution that is easier to learn in the curve as I previously mentioned.

Vorteile:

I like it, Harness simplifies and automates complex processes, allowing engineers to focus on more strategic tasks. Regarding security, the program offers integrated security features that ensure that only verified and approved versions of applications are deployed to production.

Nachteile:

The program gives me displeasure as it has a steep learning curve, especially for engineers accustomed to other CD tools. This has slowed down the learning process and in this regard, more costs are required. The program is necessary for projects. specific and we could not discontinue it completely.

Joseph
Joseph
Senior Software Engineer in Australien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Brilliant concept, updates occasionally crash JVM, price gougers

2,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The customer support is generally very good. The concept is outstanding. Being able to record runtime state in production for post-mortem debugging is utterly amazing.

Nachteile:

There are a number of critical application issues described below, but the chief con of Overops is the price. This is *at least* an order of magnitude more than the value that Overops provides, and is a kick in the teeth for surely most startup-level organisations, particularly ones like ours that helped them grow their business. There were at least 3 occasions in 2+ years of use that Overops (previously Takipi) released updates to their agent (which runs in our production JVM) that caused the whole jvm to segfault. This is a pretty poor track record (and it's more than a little ironic that this happens with a *software quality tool*). In all that time we never succeeded in getting a noise-free or complete exception notification channel between Overops and our Slack installation. It would fail to notify about most errors, and routinely report errors we had attempted to filter out. This persisted despite numerous sessions with app engineers.

Antwort von Harness

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Joseph - thank you for taking the time to leave us a review. Although, we are disappointed you had a poor experience with our software back in 2018 and would love an opportunity to show you how we've made dramatic improvements since then. Please reach out at support@overops.com to schedule a walk through.

Andrew
Software Engineer 3 in USA
Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Overops: Great software, great support

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overops is easy to use and understand. If configured correctly, it identifies the errors and problems that engineers should find most important. The UI is straight forward as well.

Vorteile:

As an SRE, it helps me to be able to see what errors are being thrown from any particular application. I help manage a stack of at least a hundred microservices, so it is impossible for me to have an in-depth understanding of every single one. If Overops detects an error, it immediately shows me exactly where in the source code this error has occurred, allowing me to communicate clearly to the team responsible for the application as to where they need improvement.

Nachteile:

The deployment process for this software was challenging. We had to engineer a lot of custom solutions to keep it running. For example, we used a hybrid approach (some infrastructure in our cloud, some in Overops') and we had to use a handful of lambdas to facilitate the storage and installation of the Overops collector agent and monitoring agent. If all of this could be encapsulated in a single Cloudformation or Terraform document, it could be deployed easier.

Antwort von Harness

vor 3 Jahren

Thank you for the review Andrew! We really appreciate you as a customer and are so glad you find value in our product and customer support.