Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Was ist Copyleaks?

Erkenne Plagiate, paraphrasierte Inhalte und nicht-verbalen Text in über 100 Sprachen. Gehe über die Überprüfung des Wort-für-Wort-Plagiats hinaus und identifiziere, ob die Bedeutung des Textes mit Hilfe von künstlicher Intelligenz und Technologie für maschinelles Lernen plagiiert wird.
Merkmale: Open-Source-API, Integration mit LMS, MS-Word und Google Docs, Cloud Computing und Storage, militärische 256-Bit-Verschlüsselung für Datensicherheit, detaillierte Suchtechnologie, Duplikat-Finder-Tool, Mobile App mit OCR-Technologie.

Wer verwendet Copyleaks?

Bildung, Universitäten und Akademiker*innen, Verlage, SEO-Agenturen, Content-Marketing-Agenturen, Anwaltskanzleien/Rechtsanwält*innen, Unternehmen für Suchmaschinenmarketing-Tools, Blogger*innen und Schriftsteller*innen.

Copyleaks Software - 1
Copyleaks Software - 2

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Copyleaks das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Copyleaks

Copyleaks

4,4 (91)
13,99 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
33
6
4,6 (91)
4,2 (91)
4,5 (91)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
12,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
81
10
4,8 (7.174)
4,5 (7.174)
4,5 (7.174)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Copyleaks

Grammarly Business
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Zeichensetzungsprüfung
OneDrive
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Dokumentenspeicher
Filesharing
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Wordtune
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Textbearbeitung
Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache
Cloud Assess
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kursverwaltung
Lernmanagement
Portal für Lernende
Zoom Workplace
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Bildschirm teilen
Videokonferenzen
Zwei-Wege-Audio und -Video
Vagaro
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Confirmations/Reminders
Mobiler Zugriff
Online-Buchung
Plagiarism Checker X
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Mehrsprachig
Ähnlichkeitserkennung für Texte
Quickify AI
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Lernpfade/-verläufe
Portal für Lernende
Trainingsverwaltung
ProWritingAid
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Zeichensetzungsprüfung

Bewertungen über Copyleaks

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,4
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,6
Kundenservice
4,5
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,2

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
60%
4
27%
3
7%
2
1%
1
4%
Keith
Keith
Manager in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Finanzdienstleistungen, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Out of the Box Detector

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Copyleaks is a plagiarism detector that uses sophisticated intelligence to find duplicated content listed in various search engine results.

Vorteile:

It's completely interactive with font style and more. I like how the text editor resembles Microsoft Word Document.

Nachteile:

No problem with this software. I would like to see a percentage of plagiarism for each word.

David
Senior Software Engineer in Deutschland
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

One of the best plagiarism checkers out there

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

I've used Copyleaks while writing my master thesis and it has been an excellent experience. Everything from signing up, payments and the actual literature comparison process worked as expected. Having an AI checker in addition to traditional text cross-referencing definitely helped me to feel more confident with the results and in the end my thesis passed all reviews at the university. Copyleaks supports the important and usual file types and does a very good job in parsing PDF files, which, in my opinion, is the most important feature. In my case, I analyzed a PDF generated from LaTeX, and I was happy with the results.

Nachteile:

At times, viewing the analysis results was a bit laggy on my quite powerful machine, which might be due to having a quite large document or due to the browser itself. Another thing was that sometimes it seemed slightly finicky with whitespace handling. Sometimes it reported very short fragments of general language as plagiarized. I do, however, prefer a higher false positive rate over possibly missed hits.

Tracy
Owner in USA
Unterhaltung, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Inaccurate Results EVERY TIME

1,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: I conducted my own study with random input both human and AI generated and it FAILED EVERY Time. It did not detect the AI and it said human in put was AI.

Vorteile:

Nothing. It is a scam and not worth trying the free trial

Nachteile:

They lie about the accuracy. Read the details of how they feel justified in claiming 99% accuracy. They should be sued for false advertising.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

A Reliable Tool for Plagiarism and AI Detection

5,0 vor 2 Monaten

Kommentare: Altogether, I have a positive attitude towards Copyleaks. I highly recommend it to students, teachers and anyone who wants to verify plagiarism or AI created content. The AI Content Detector is extremely precise, and I used it without any doubts when I checked my essays. The Plagiarism Checker is also accurate, and being multilingual is always a plus in my book! The browser extension was a nice addition – it allowed the user to view the online content right on the current page. Although the prices could be lower for students, I believe that the tools are worth the money if you need to check the uniqueness of the material. In conclusion, I would most surely endorse Copyleaks for anyone who is in search of a reliable plagiarism and AI check service.

Vorteile:

What I enjoyed most about Copyleaks is how simple it is to use. The website is easy to use along with the tools that have been provided to the customer. When I tested whether my essays were written by an AI, the AI Content Detector did a great job. Against AI-generated articles from tools such as ChatGPT and the latest model Bard, it can identify them accurately with more than 99% effectiveness. I also can appreciate the Plagiarism Checker tool since it is available in over one hundred languages with no problems. The browser extension was super useful too—it allowed me detect whether an article on the internet or a facebook status was written by AI while using the browser. All in all, Copyleaks has that kind of usability that makes me think this is a professional tool I can employ easily as a student.

Nachteile:

There is one feature which I did not like as much: the price. As for the tools, they are excellent, though if you need to scan a lot of content, it is going to cost some money. The most basic plan only allows for two users and any addition is going to cost you more. However, the credit system may be a bit confusing at the beginning: the user is to remember the number of words he/she is scanning to not to exceed the number of credits. A small problem is that the 'Writing Assistant' little bit fails to identify all the grammatical errors, so I had to make sure on my own. But all of these are inconsequential when compared to the overall usefulness of the tools.

Shao
Shao
Technical Director in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Schreiben & Editieren, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

A good service on plagiarism

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

This software can provide plagiarism service, with high quality, for multiple languages other than English.

Nachteile:

The API response is a bit slow. I understand it costs computer resources for plagiarism operation, but obviously it would be better if we can get several initial result within seconds.