--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über AppMySite zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AppMySite Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Programmiersoftware](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [AppMySite](/software/184901/appmysite) # AppMySite Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/184901/appmysite Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/184901/appmysite?page=2) > AppMySite ist ein KI-gestützter mobiler App-Entwickler, mit der Unternehmen auf einfache Weise hochwertige mobile Apps erstellen können. > > Bewertung: **4.1/5** von 51 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet AppMySite? KMUs | Unternehmen, die auf WordPress und WooCommerce-Websites arbeiten | Alle, die mobile Apps erstellen möchten ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.1/5** | 51 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: AppMySite - **Gegründet**: 2015 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 69,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Arabisch, Chinesisch, Chinesisch (traditionell), Deutsch, Dänisch, Englisch, Französisch, Hebräisch, Hindi, Italienisch, Japanisch, Koreanisch, Niederländisch, Persisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch, Schwedisch, Spanisch, Thailändisch, Türkisch, Vietnamesisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 208 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Debuggen - Drag-and-Drop - Einsatz-Management - Grafische Benutzeroberfläche - Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung - Kompatibilitätstests - No-Code - Visuelle Modellierung - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Management ## Integrationen (4 insgesamt) - Firebase - Google AdMob - WooCommerce - WordPress ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [No-Code Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32095/no-code-platform/software) - [App-Builder Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32016/app-building/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Shopney](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203044/shopney) — 4.9/5 (42 reviews) 2. [FlutterFlow](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1027864/flutterflow) — 4.4/5 (85 reviews) 3. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.6/5 (950 reviews) 4. [Appy Pie](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/140928/appy-pie) — 4.6/5 (1394 reviews) 5. [Zoho Creator](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/211755/zoho-creator) — 4.3/5 (170 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A practical and efficient no-code solution for building mobile apps" — 4.0/5 > **Furkan** | *13. August 2026* | Design | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: AppMySite makes it surprisingly easy to turn an existing website into a functional mobile app without having to build everything from scratch. The no-code workflow is straightforward, and most of the setup can be completed without technical knowledge. I especially liked the customization options, real-time preview, and the ability to manage both Android and iOS apps from one place. It saved us a significant amount of development time. > > **Nachteile**: While the customization options are good for most standard use cases, there are still some limitations when you want more control over complex layouts or highly specific app interactions. Some advanced settings can also take a little time to understand. I would like to see more flexibility for custom UI components and deeper integrations, but these were not major issues for our use case. > > Overall, my experience with AppMySite has been very positive. It provided a practical way to create and manage a mobile app without committing to a full custom development process. The platform is easy to navigate, the setup process is well structured, and changes can be tested quickly. For businesses that already have a website and want to establish a mobile presence efficiently, I think it offers a very good balance between ease of use, customization, and cost. ----- ### "The Ultimate Shortcut for WordPress to Mobile—Fast, Professional, and No-Code" — 5.0/5 > **Nancy** | *16. März 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The most impressive aspect of AppMySite is its seamless integration with WordPress, which allows for an incredibly fast conversion from a website to a fully functional mobile app. The no-code interface is exceptionally intuitive, making it accessible for those without a technical background to design and customize their app in real-time. Additionally, the instant synchronization feature ensures that any updates made on the website are reflected in the app immediately, providing a consistent user experience without extra manual work. > > **Nachteile**: While the platform is excellent for getting an app up and running quickly, the customization options feel a bit basic for more advanced design needs. Specifically, there is a lack of native form submission within the app interface. To handle data collection or inquiries, I had to rely on my WordPress site's existing forms rather than having a built-in, native mobile solution. This adds an extra step in the workflow and limits the "app-first" feel for certain interactive features. > > As an entrepreneur, my overall experience with AppMySite has been excellent. It is a powerful, budget-friendly solution for anyone looking to bridge the gap between a web presence and a mobile application without hiring a development team. The platform allowed me to launch a professional-looking app in a fraction of the time it would normally take. While the customization can be basic—and I did have to rely on my WordPress setup for things like form submissions—the trade-off for speed and ease of use is well worth it. It’s a reliable 'bridge' technology that does exactly what it promises: turns your site into an app with minimal friction ----- ### "Breakout Tools Review" — 5.0/5 > **Horace** | *14. August 2026* | E-Learning | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Great value for the money and the product does indeed deliver on what it promises. Moreover, for the times when I needed customer support, it has been a very positive experience...timely and helpful in resolving my issues. > > **Nachteile**: For some reason I thought, since I have the version that includes publishing the app, I thought the Android publishing process would be the same as the Apple one. Apple does a complete publishing of the build files, but unless I did something wrong, Android you still had to upload the files yourself, unlike the case with Apple. > > Overall, I love the product a lot and have no complaints that would prevent me from keeping it or recommending it to others. ----- ### "Review for the app" — 3.0/5 > **Nisha** | *21. August 2026* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Android publishing was easy and straightforward. No-code development is a major advantage. Customer support through email is good, and the overall features are useful and easy to understand. > > **Nachteile**: iOS publishing is quite complicated, especially for users without a Mac. There is no direct option to call customer support, and the chat support is often not very helpful for resolving technical issues. > > Overall, my experience with AppMySite has been good. The no-code platform makes app development much easier, and Android publishing was a smooth experience. However, the iOS publishing process is considerably more complicated and could be made much simpler, especially for users working without a Mac. Better real-time technical support and a simpler iOS publishing workflow would significantly improve the overall experience. ----- ### "Great for healthcare app shells, but switching project modes can break your Play Store keystore" — 5.0/5 > **Miguel** | *10. Juni 2026* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We used AppMySite to publish the doctor-facing shell app for SaludChat, a WhatsApp-based medical teleorientation platform. The web-to-URL mode let us wrap our Next.js web app into a native Android and iOS app without any mobile development. The iOS build with push notifications worked correctly, and the Android app was published to Google Play without issues once the keystore problem was resolved. Support was the real standout — when we hit a critical signing mismatch, they manually aligned the keystore from our original project (App ID \[sensitive content hidden\]) to our new one (App ID \[sensitive content hidden\]) so we could keep the same Play Store listing. > > **Nachteile**: We originally started with WordPress mode and later needed to switch to URL/WebView mode to point to our web app. AppMySite requires creating a completely new project for this — there's no in-place migration. Since the signing keystore is held server-side and tied to the project, the new project generated a different keystore, which broke our Google Play signing chain. We had to open a support ticket and wait for them to manually fix the SHA1 mismatch between both App IDs. This should be a self-serve option, not a support escalation. But they help us a lot\! > > For a medical SaaS startup needing native app shells quickly without a mobile dev team, AppMySite delivered. We published our Android doctor app to Google Play and have iOS running with push notifications — all from our existing web product. The main friction came from an architectural limitation: switching app modes requires a new project and breaks your existing keystore, which in a production Play Store context is a serious issue. Their support team resolved it, but it cost us time during a pre-launch phase. If you plan your project mode correctly from day one, the platform is solid. If you need to restructure mid-way, expect to depend on their support to recover your signing chain. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/184901/appmysite?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/184901/appmysite) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten