Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist IronWorker?

Eine gehostete Hintergrund-Joblösung, mit der du deine Container mit dynamischem Maßstab und detaillierten Analysen und vielem mehr ausführen kannst.

Keine Anbietersperren
Ultimative Flexibilität – On-Premise, Cloud oder Hybrid.
Cloudagnostisch
Sprachagnostisch
Einfach zu bedienen – Kein Server-Management, intuitive UI

Wer verwendet IronWorker?

Die Lösung eignet sich für jeden und alle, von kleinen Unternehmen bis hin zu Konzernen und Fortune-100-Unternehmen.

Du bist nicht sicher, ob IronWorker das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

IronWorker

IronWorker

4,3 (54)
29,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
41
4
4,1 (54)
3,9 (54)
4,2 (54)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
7,75 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
160
20
4,0 (14.130)
4,3 (14.130)
4,2 (14.130)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu IronWorker

Jira
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Agile Methodiken
Aufgabenmanagement
Projektplanung/Terminierung
Odoo
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Fondsrechnung
Kontrolle des Genehmigungsprozesses
Zoho Creator
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung
Quellkontrolle
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
groundcover
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Echtzeit-Daten
Echtzeitüberwachung
CodeNOW
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Cloud Computing
Einsatz-Management
Unterstützt zahlreiche Programmiersprachen
Microsoft Azure
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Cloud Computing
Datensicherheit
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Odyssey
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Caspio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datenmigration
Projektplanung/Terminierung
Workflow-Management
AppBase DCM & BPM Platform
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Kontaktmanagement
Workflow-Konfiguration

Bewertungen über IronWorker

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,3
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,1
Kundenservice
4,2
Funktionen
4,0
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,9

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
41%
4
48%
3
11%
Dan
Dan
VP - US in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple set up, very good support, and clean interface

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I like Iron Worker. I don't use all of the features but it has helped a lot with scaling up and streamlining functions in my app.

Vorteile:

It's simple but scalable, the support is very good. When setting up I had a lot of questions and they respond quickly. I like the interface, the ability to easily see exactly what is contained in each request is great and the API is straightforward.

Nachteile:

There is not much middle ground on the pricing, it's either an opening price point plan with more limited features, and then the next level jumps up significantly in price. I am using this for an app that is not processing a up huge volume of traffic so I am able to get by with the features on the lowest price point plan, but I would like something offered in the middle that doesn't jump up in price so steeply. I should mention I am using the worker via the Heroku app. The only other negative is that the worker has gotten hung up on me a couple of times but it has only happened minimally and they are quick to resolve once I report it.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly scalable infrastructure, plus fast and easy code releases thanks to Docker integration

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I am very satisfied with IronWorker and I have recommended it to my friends and colleagues

Vorteile:

I love that Iron Workers can now be loaded using Docker containers! Speeds up release time exponentially and makes testing significantly easier since my local environment is always the same as the production environment. It is also fairly easy to push workers directly from my code base (PHP) or create crons that are run from the command line.

Nachteile:

The docker documentation is poor. Each time I needed to launch a worker in a new environment, I needed to talk with Iron support team to help them build the Dockerfile. IronWorker doesn't appear to be primary product of Iron either (that would be IronMQ), so updates to the platform are somewhat infrequent.

Marc
Senior software architect in UK
Gewerbeimmobilien, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

It does what I’d expect it to do

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Asynchronous, retried job dispatch such as sending emails

Vorteile:

It is relatively low effort. Solves the retry to send this to a third part some what simply.

Nachteile:

Testing is a pain. Getting the correct dependancies installed can feel like a lottery. It feels like it has been abandoned in terms of updates.

Atul
Atul
Technical Team Lead in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

With their unique cloud features, IronWorkers are simple to set up and maintain

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: IronWorker is mostly used by us to schedule tasks that would otherwise call for running CRON on a dedicated computer. IronWorker makes it simple to schedule jobs in a cloud environment, especially a persistent one. Before, a computer running a cron daemon was required. Do it now. It's absolutely wonderful. simple to use And it supports PHP natively.

Vorteile:

It is quite simple to assure consistency with your local environment because IronWorkers deploys the workers using Docker containers. My PHP code is immediately executed by IronWorker. Jobs may be easily scheduled. The scheduler is a fantastic feature, too. simplifies the process of running PHP functions in the cloud without the need to set up servers or containers. They all agree that using this tool will help you maintain order in your creative process.

Nachteile:

The dashboard doesn't provide a means to change code. Uploading the full solution is necessary in order to update the code, even for a little modification. Typically, this is not an issue. The upload procedure is quite laborious. To edit my code online in a browser window would be ideal. For the previous several years, the product hasn't undergone much innovation, but I don't think that's necessary.

Abhinav
Abhinav
Sr Software Integrator in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

DevOps solution to speedup the Software development.

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Iron Worker helps in simplifying the development and focus on the cost cutting. The custom auto scaling helps to set the threshold limit so we should not run out of budget. The opensource server-less computing with help of IronFuncation give the wings to application and help in integrating with the containers .

Vorteile:

Iron Worker helps in managing the multiple management portfolio to speed up the software development and delivery. It also provides the flexibility while designing the deployment cycle for different level of architecture. Brief metrics help in auditing and identifying area of improvements. Simple Queue Service is much more enhanced and provide the multiple option like sharing the queue and generating the report and analytics to get the area of cost cutting. SQS dashboard help to analysis all the things in the single panel window. Authentication is provided with the token which make the queue share possible without compromising with the security.

Nachteile:

REST based API configuration is little complex and we need to go through the documentation before implementation as user interface for setup wizard should be user friendly and simple.