--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Endtest zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Endtest Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Automated Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Endtest](/software/180545/endtest) # Endtest Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180545/endtest Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180545/endtest?page=2) > Codefreies automatisches Testen. Angetrieben durch maschinelles Lernen. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 45 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Endtest? Entwickelt für Unternehmen, die Web- und mobile Anwendungen entwickeln. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 45 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Endtest - **Gegründet**: 2016 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 178,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Testskript-Bewertungen - Unterstützt parallele Ausführung - hierarchische Ansicht ## Optionen für Kundensupport - 24/7 Live-Support ## Category - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 4. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 5. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Feature-packed - Easy to use and setup" — 4.0/5 > **Maarten** | *29. Oktober 2019* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It took less than half a day to get acquainted and up to speed with Endtest. We quickly had the first test cases set up. The ability to schedule test runs and invoke the tests through a URL are really helpful. > > **Nachteile**: Endtest offers support for the most popular and recent browser versions. Would be great if older versions and less popular browsers can be tested in the same way. > > We ensure proper operation of new releases for our customers. Better quality, happier customers\! ----- ### "Excellent product" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *7. Juli 2020* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: There are a lot of things. I can't just name a few > > **Nachteile**: Codeless automated testing. It has never helped me automate any stuff. > > It was great experience. Maybe you guys can improve the mobile automation a little better. There are a lot errors there. I have already mentioned it to Matt, who is doing an excellent job. ----- ### "Decent Option for Cross-Browser/Device Testing" — 3.0/5 > **Glen** | *9. November 2018* | Gastgewerbe | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Navigation is intuitive and the page loads quickly to ensure a good work pace. Broad support for different browsers and devices. If statement support and database connection/querying is also nice. > > **Nachteile**: Lack of in-browser action recording features, no option to export/import to/from Selenium or other popular frameworks. No option for global or suite-level variables, and test-level variables are not displayed in an easy to view UI. > > One division of our company does use this for testing of our public-facing website. My team and I mostly work on internal tools for the company's finance team. I was unable to see a compelling reason to use this over GhostInspector or Mabl, both of which seem better suited for functional testing. The wide variety of device/browser compatibility is impressive, but not strictly necessary for our particular business needs. I think if EndTest had action recording, that would be a different story. ----- ### "A beginner testers view" — 5.0/5 > **Inguna** | *14. Juli 2020* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Video recordings of test execution were very helpful in determining if I need to tweak my test steps. Also, the gratifying moment when the test was run successfully. > > **Nachteile**: Editing test steps could be easier, such as changing the sequence of steps without having to completely delete and write a new step. I would also have liked to reuse some parts of tests, sort of like a library of snippets that you can build. > > I did manual testing before trying Endtest. Even with my relatively limited technical knowledge, I was still able to learn how to set up tests properly. ----- ### "Automating work and tests with unparalleled ease" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *18. August 2021* | Bibliotheken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The ease of use of Endtest is great. I came from automating manually with Python, which was a lot slower. Now I can press record, do the test, and it's as good as done. Just add some logic with the easy-to-navigate Action menu to finish up. > > **Nachteile**: One of the few things that I miss, compared with 'manual' programming, is being able to copy individual lines of code/actions. There is an option to copy/move an entire test case however. > > So far we have automated some easy jobs which were previously manually processed. We're also busy setting up scheduled regression tests. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180545/endtest?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180545/endtest) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten