Dynamics NAV WMS

Dynamics NAV WMS

von MetaOption

Wer nutzt diese Software?

Existing NAV Clients

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

84 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 3.7/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 3.4/5
  • Kundenservice 3.5/5
  • Funktionen 3.6/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 3.3/5

Produktinformationen

  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Gratis Testen Nein
  • Einsatz Cloud, SaaS, Web
    Installiert - Windows
  • Training Persönlich
    Live Online
    Webinare
    Dokumentation
  • Kundenbetreuung 24/7 (Live Vertreter)
    Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • MetaOption
  • http://www.metaoption.com/
  • Gegründet 2005

Über Dynamics NAV WMS

MetaOptions Microsoft Dynamics NAV WMS (Warehouse Management System) extends the functionality of Microsoft Dynamics NAV to offer a complete solution in your warehouse, to automatically drive productivity and optimize warehouse capacity. Microsoft Dynamics NAV helps SMEs to automate and connect their sales, purchasing, operations, accounting and inventory management. MetaOption helps warehouses work at their most efficient. Together, they are the perfect pairing.

168756

Dynamics NAV WMS Funktionen

  • 3PL-Management
  • Auftragsmanagement
  • Barcode / RFID
  • Echtzeit-Synchronisierung
  • Einkauf
  • Inventarverwaltung
  • Mehrere Standorte
  • Prognose
  • Qualitätsmanagement
  • Retourenmanagement
  • Versand-Management
  • Wareneingangs- / Einlagerungsverwaltung

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Dynamics NAV WMS

Accounting Intern

Bewertet am 21.1.2019
Verifizierter Rezensent
Accounting and Finance Intern
Buchhaltung, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5/5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5/5
Kundenbetreuung
5/5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: It is good

Vorteile: Categories of Account Receivable, Account Payable, and General Ledger

Nachteile: it has lot of information that I need to learn

Pretty easy to navigate, but the screen formatting needs adjusted

Bewertet am 19.9.2019
Lora L.
Accountant
Bau, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
4/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4/5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5/5
Kundenbetreuung
3/5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: We use the collections module, sales, purchasing, service cost, job cost, subcontractor module, and more. We use purchase orders and 3 way matching and use dynamics for a wide range of use.

Vorteile: You can easily adjust titles to be in red or have distinctive features to stand out, but it is not always easy to do on the financial module and you cannot do it when using features like smartlist.

Nachteile: The inability to generate certain reports (you have to set them up yourself) which can be VERY time consuming.

Great Product

Bewertet am 23.10.2019
Hunter H.
Officer
Maschinerie, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4/5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5/5
Kundenbetreuung
5/5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: Microsoft has always been a great service that our company enjoys using. This service continues to strengthen the brand of Microsoft.

Vorteile: The thing i like is that the interface is easy to use. The setup requirements are better than the normal setup ideals.

Nachteile: I did not like how it is difficult to add users into our system. Not everyone has had a positive experience with this software.

Bewertet am 30.7.2013
Scott M.
Quelle des Nutzers 
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice
2/5
Gesamt
1/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
2/5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
1/5
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kommentare: I have worked in the supply chain for 5 years now and have experience with 3 different ERP's. Our old ERP was limiting, though it was also fairly straight forward. The biggest issue seemed to be how incredibly date sensitive how ever without requiring dates at the same time. This pushed the change to a new ERP and Microsoft NAV was chosen through their partner company Just Foods. A truly bizarre system, the flow of documentation through the program makes little sense and over complicates what would normally be easy transactions. For instance Purchase Orders follow this document flow - First the purchase order is created once you receive your order, a warehouse receipt document is created and received in. However, once it is received in the warehouse, the receipt document disappears and becomes a posted receipt document (both have completely different document numbers that don't connect to each other). At this point your original Purchase order has been changed to reflect what ever was received in, and you have to have a second column to view what you originally ordered. Otherwise, figuring out if you over or under received is difficult at best. Now once the invoice comes in and is posted against the posted warehouse document, your purchase order disappears. The only place your purchase order exists in its original form is the in Purchase order Archive, which was never mentioned to us during implementation, forcing us to call Just Foods later on and pay for their customer service. This same, strange flow of documents, that are essentially intermediary documents only existing to complete a transaction, over complicate what should be a straight forward shipping and receiving process. There are some other basic functionality issues, like figuring out what day you actually shipped or received an item. The easiest way to figure that out seems to require access to the warehouse functionality, which you may or may not want people to have. We get a lot of errors where the tables are locked with other users, and you are just stuck until the report or other person finishes up. The Dimensions on lines can mysteriously disappear, even though the G/L Code and Department code show as filled out in the order. Our MRP has never worked correctly, so in general, we are forced to use Excel to put together our production schedule. All in all, its a sub-par program that you can tell is 5 or 6 different original programs that have been slapped together to try an resemble an ERP system. Now having said all that, obviously I am looking at this from a supply chain perspective as it is what I do. Perhaps on the accounting end it has some ease of use, but due to how difficult it is to understand on the operations end, the accounting rarely comes out correct due to faulty information in the system. On the positive side there do seem to be a million different ways to do the same thing in NAV, and many of the built in reports are extremely useful assuming that the information in the system is correct.

Best application for ERP in SME

Bewertet am 13.8.2019
Verifizierter Rezensent
undergraduate
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
4/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5/5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5/5
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: According my experience I recommend this for small scale and medium scale business entities and not for the large scale entities.

Vorteile: This is a kind of ERP software that highly used by the manufacturing organizations. The application is advisable for use the medium scale business entities who are operating in manufacturing, retail, trading and distribution business activities. Though this is recognized as an accounting software, it is having the multiple function platforms such as HR management, project management, sales and marketing and supply chain management.
Obtaining the information from the system is easy by the way of generating types of reports.

Nachteile: The most important drawback of the application is it is functioning slowly when few windows are open. Therefore, it needs to close the windows again and again when application is getting slow. The managing of the application requires a comprehensive experience and knowledge on it.
It takes a long time to enter the data to the system. Users need to be familiar with application when entering data. For an instance, there are more unnecessary fields to be filled.

Lies weitere Bewertungen