Monograph

von Dixon & Moe

5 / 5 4 Bewertungen
Monograph

Wer nutzt diese Software?

5 to 25 person architecture firms looking to upgrade from spreadsheets

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

4 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 5 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 5 / 5
  • Kundenservice 5 / 5
  • Funktionen 4 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 5 / 5

Produktdetails

  • Startpreis $15/Monat
  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Kostenlose Testversion Ja
  • Einsatz Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training Live Online
  • Kundenbetreuung Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • Dixon & Moe
  • https://monograph.io
  • Gegründet 2013

Über Monograph

Monograph is project management and time tracking software for small architecture firms (less than 25 employees). Most applications built for the AEC industry lack the design and professionalism that a modern firm needs. We're passionate about architecture and believe that the tools architects use should be as beautiful and functional as the buildings that they create! Monograph is developed by 3 trained architects based in San Francisco.

Monograph Funktionen

  • 2D-Zeichnung
  • 3D-Modellierung
  • Abfassung
  • Angebote / Vorschläge
  • Bills of material
  • Building Information Modeling
  • Dokumentenmanagement
  • Kontaktmanagement
  • Projektmanagement
  • Präsentations-Tools
  • Vertragsmanagement

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Monograph

The best project management platform out there

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 14.8.2018
Nicholas W.
Director of Innovation
Architektur & Planung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
Quelle: asdf
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
4 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: At our small firm (8 employees), I was in charge of finding a project management platform for our company to use. I have downloaded every major software and tried at least 30-40 different platforms. None of them compare to the ease of use, simplicity, graphic style, and overall effectiveness of Monograph. Asana, Jira, Monday, Wrike, Hive, LiquidPlanner, Forecast, Avaza, 10,000 FT, and many others did not make my company's cut. Monograph did. After deciding to use the platform, Monograph's founder hopped on a conference call and talked about what we do at our office and how Monograph could help or even change (They're still developing the platform every single day) to help meet some of our needs. We have continued monthly calls to check in and see how progress is going and how Monograph is continuing to be the perfect fit for our firm.

Vorteile: Ease of Use. Graphic Simplicity. Instant understanding for showing any stakeholder the relevant project information. Project time/expense budgeting. Instant communication from developers. Developers are still developing and tailoring the software to how we WANT to use it.

Nachteile: Missing some important tools (Like Quickbooks integration, project summary pages comparing budgets to actual time/resources used, etc.) - However, the developers are actively working on a long list of customer's feedback for future integration

Project Management Designed for Designers

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 27.8.2018
Bryan M.
Director
Architektur & Planung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
Quelle: asdf
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: Only a few months in and Monograph has become essential to the way we practice. It's a platform that you love because it does what it does well and lets you get back to doing what you do. In the design environment it feels great to have a project management tool that doesn't infringe on your work-vibes. Excited to see how it evolves and grows.

Vorteile: Within minutes we had customized all of the inputs around our operational needs and had a handful of projects up and running in no time. The clean graphic interface and underlying project management logics of Monograph made the experience smooth and the overall process was painless. The dev team was right there to answer any questions we had and listened to our quirky requests for future features.

Nachteile: No complaints that hindered Monograph's usability for what we need. In the future, we wish there were some non-traditional project cost management tools and that there were tools to set and track goals.

Lies weitere Bewertungen