--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Git zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Git Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Source Code Control Systeme](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Git](/software/177211/git) # Git Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177211/git Seite: 1 / 20\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177211/git?page=2) > Verteiltes Quellkontrollsystem, das Softwareentwickler\*innen hilft, mehrere Revisionen desselben Projekts zu verfolgen und zu verwalten. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 475 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 475 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Git - **Region**: Brooklyn, USA ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 0,01 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Codeprüfung - Fehlerverfolgung - Versionskontrolle ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - GitHub ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Apache Subversion](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177270/apache-subversion) — 4.1/5 (49 reviews) 2. [Gitpod](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/219601/gitpod) — 4.8/5 (5 reviews) 3. [abc](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1026917/abc) (0 reviews) 4. [FlexNet Code Aware](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/208699/flexnet-code-aware) (0 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Tool for Managing Code with Strong Collaboration Features" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *2. Mai 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about Git is how powerful it is for managing code changes and keeping track of project history. It makes it easy to see what was changed, when it was changed, and by whom, which is very helpful when working on development projects. In terms of value for money, it is excellent since it is open source and free to use, which makes it accessible for individuals and teams of any size. Ease of use can depend on experience level, but once the basic commands are understood, it becomes very efficient and reliable for daily work. Setup is fairly straightforward, and once configured, it integrates well into different development environments. Features like branching and merging are very useful for working on multiple parts of a project at the same time without interfering with the main codebase. Code editing is not directly handled by Git, but it works smoothly with most editors, making version control seamless during development. For project management, it helps teams stay organized by tracking changes and allowing collaboration without overwriting each other’s work. Customer support is mainly community based, but there is a large amount of documentation and resources available, which usually makes it easy to find solutions. > > **Nachteile**: What I like least about Git is that it can be confusing at the beginning. The commands and workflow take some time to understand, especially for someone new to version control. There is also a learning curve when dealing with things like merge conflicts, which can feel a bit overwhelming until there is more experience with it. The interface is mostly command based, so it does not feel very intuitive compared to tools with a visual setup. Overall, it is very powerful, but the complexity can make it harder to use comfortably at first. > > Overall experience with Git has been very good once the basics are understood. It is a reliable tool for tracking changes in code and managing different versions of a project, which makes development work much more organized. At the beginning, it can feel a bit complex, but over time it becomes an essential part of the workflow. It helps avoid mistakes, keeps a clear history of changes, and makes collaboration with others much smoother. ----- ### "Powerful, professional, and essential, but with a learning curve" — 5.0/5 > **Álvaro** | *6. Juli 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Git is the most widely used tool globally for managing code and application versions. It's ideal for professional use, and is likely the top choice for companies looking to adopt a tool with these capabilities. It's easy to install and set up via terminal with simple commands, in just a few steps, it's fully up and running locally. It's also free plan, which is a major plus. You can configure various behaviors, specify files to ignore when uploading changes, and manage credentials. Remote Git configuration is very comprehensive, clearly identifying ownership, authorship, and access permissions. Its main function is code editing, allowing you to add new files, write code, or make changes to the branch you're working on. You can also have multiple branches open at once and work on each of them separately. It offers strong version control across branches, letting you know whether one is ahead of or behind another. > > **Nachteile**: It's not easy to use, as it requires prior study, though this knowledge is usually acquired alongside learning programming itself. It's not specifically designed for project management, for that, there are other applications that integrate with Git. > > I use it daily since I began my studies as a programmer, I learned to use Git and version control at the same time as I was learning to code in various programming languages. I still use it today in my professional career, both as a user managing my own applications and to review other users' work when needed. ----- ### "The Good Git" — 5.0/5 > **saheed** | *19. Oktober 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I started intense and regular use of Git few years ago. Even though, I had to learn its usage especially form command line, its been very useful to facilitate seamless collaboration and ease development effort. > > **Nachteile**: Git a sophisticated tool that requires an initial effort to learn and develop some skills in it. For bigger files, it could be a bit slow for my liking. > > I loved using Git particularly from command line and I often refer to its documentation which has been helpful. ----- ### "Git out of here" — 3.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *2. Februar 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's very easy to create and initiate a copy of the repository > > **Nachteile**: It's distributed so no backup is done to your work is done till you push it to the repository, no one organization to give you support, doesn't handle empty folders (no warnings is given), no easy move files with history from one repository to another (while keeping history in the source repository), no one view to control your actions - need to move from your IDE to web to CLI, each sub module is presented by SHA number and not tag and version, if you have sub modules and you do git clone URI then you would get empty folder (no warning again) because that's the default. History is stored locally and consumes disk space (instead of at least connecting to the remote server as an option). Other than CLI there's no official supported GUI. There's much more like the need to have gitlfs client. > > It's easy to get it to do what you want if you know all the switches and the options, you won't get warnings if something fails, you have to switch from web to IDE to CLI so each helps you progress in the task. Good for open source while you're not the one managing the code. ----- ### "The industry standard for version control" — 5.0/5 > **Hrithik** | *13. Juni 2026* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Git gives developers a safe and flexible way to manage code changes, collaborate with teammates, and track project history. Branching and merging make it easy to work on features independently, and having a complete history of changes has saved me countless times when debugging issues or rolling back changes. It's become such a fundamental part of software development that I rarely think about working without it. > > **Nachteile**: Git has a steep learning curve, especially when dealing with rebasing, merge conflicts, and more advanced workflows. Error messages are not always beginner friendly, and it can be intimidating for developers who are new to version control. Even experienced users occasionally need to look up commands for complex operations. > > My experience with Git has been overwhelmingly positive. I use it every day for professional software development and collaboration. Whether working on small projects or large codebases with many contributors, Git scales well and remains one of the most important tools in a developer's workflow. ----- Seite: 1 / 20\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177211/git?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177211/git) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten