Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist WhiteSmoke?

Überprüft auf erweiterte Grammatik-, Rechtschreib- und Stilfehler. WhiteSmoke wird weltweit von Unternehmen für eine korrekte Online-Kommunikation verwendet.

Wer verwendet WhiteSmoke?

Es kann am Arbeitsplatz und von Unternehmensfachleuten verwendet werden, die Geschäftsberichte und Dokumentationen erstellen.

WhiteSmoke Software - 1
WhiteSmoke Software - 2
WhiteSmoke Software - 3
WhiteSmoke Software - 4
WhiteSmoke Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob WhiteSmoke das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

WhiteSmoke

WhiteSmoke

3,8 (24)
10,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
31
1
3,9 (24)
3,5 (24)
3,1 (24)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
12,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
60
10
4,8 (7.060)
4,5 (7.060)
4,5 (7.060)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu WhiteSmoke

Grammarly Business
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Textbearbeitung
Frase
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Content-Management
Keyword-Recherche Tools
Wettbewerbsanalyse
Grammar Checker
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Textbearbeitung
Dragon Professional Individual
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Sprach-Erkennung
Spracherkennungsanalyse
Textbearbeitung
ProWritingAid
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Zeichensetzungsprüfung
Writefull
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Textbearbeitung
Textprüfung
Warnungen zu Problembereichen
Ginger
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grammatikprüfung
Rechtschreibprüfung
Zeichensetzungsprüfung
Lytho Workflow
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Filesharing
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Copyleaks
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Berichterstattung und Statistik
Beurteilung-Management

Bewertungen über WhiteSmoke

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
3,8
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,9
Kundenservice
3,1
Funktionen
3,8
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,5

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
38%
4
29%
3
13%
2
13%
1
8%
John
John
Regional Vallue Engineering in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Tiefbau, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Power grammar and editing software

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I would totally be a loss without WhiteSmoke. Even when I'm not using it strictly professional. I use it to make sure that my casual writing is up-to-par.

Vorteile:

The functionality of the software, which allows you to check on your overall grammar:subject verb agreement, readability of our document and the quick response to your grammar checks.

Nachteile:

It is hard to pinpoint anything that I don't like, because it fills my need by enabling me to check a document as I write, also it allows me to the opportunity to accept certain changes that make the document correct and well as its readability.

James
Finance Chief in USA
Buchhaltung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

WhiteSmoke Review

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I like being able to add custom dictionaries very easily. It seems like spell checker jargon and often uses internally uncountable words as part of the full text to correct these errors instead of wasting the manager's time by adding abbreviations as words to speed up revisions.

Vorteile:

WhiteSmoke works well on every report that our field technician sends to the manager. The manager then matches the report and sends it to the operations supervisor, using WhiteSmoke to mix the reports with different types of entries while eliminating errors. The result is a fast and consistent document.

Nachteile:

Many current "style guides" seem to have rather conservative responses to analyzing the collection of text and sentence structures present in the document being reviewed. I wanted to get a more interactive experience about improving grammar.

Jen
Writer/ Marketer in USA
Marketing & Werbung, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

I Used to Love WhiteSmoke

2,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Without notice, my lifetime (paid) subscription shut off on January 1, 2021. The notice yet again said my "free" version expired. I emailed customer service thinking they'd faced some kind of error that took it offline again and that they'd tell me when to expect it to come back up. Instead, I got a curt note back informing me that "lifetime" refers to the lifetime of the product and they felt like they'd delivered on it. They offered me a "discounted rate" to sign up for their desktop subscription that only works on one system. No thanks. I can't think of anything more worthless to me. I use several computers and logins based on what project I'm working on. Being able to only have it in one location is a step back into the dark ages. Moreover, after the way this company has treated me, I wouldn't give them another dime. I don't trust them and am moving to Grammarly or Hemmingway.

Vorteile:

I started using WhiteSmoke when I was a newbie content writer. I loved it because it was easy to use and genuinely taught me how to be a better writer. I learned what errors I usually made and how to correct them, which made me feel very confident publishing work or submitting it to clients.

Nachteile:

The service was terrible. I purchased a lifetime "anywhere" (online/ cloud) subscription and it would lock me out on an annual basis, telling me my "free" version expired. Customer service would take days to respond and it would take a week or more before it would come back. When they'd finally respond, which sometimes took several messages spread out over several weeks, they'd talk to me like I should be grateful they were even answering. Considering I wrote for a living and was producing four or five pieces per day, not having access to the proofing tool I paid for was crippling.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Übersetzung und Lokalisierung, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Excellent tool but not very user-friendly

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Excellent tool except for the formatting issue.

Vorteile:

Excellent grammatical and orthographic correction features, context and style check.

Nachteile:

It saves the corrected version in plain text so you lose any formatting when you paste the corrected text to the original document. It is hard to proofread lengthy texts due to the loss of formatting. It would be great if the formatting could be retained. Maybe a plugin that works directly in Microsoft Word would be a solution.

Diane
Paralegal in USA
Anwaltskanzlei, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Accurate spellcheck.

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Whitesmoke is great for spellcheck, but I have submitted multiple documents with punctuation and grammar errors that whitesmoke failed to catch.
In my view, its not as good as the other software that's available.

Vorteile:

Whitesmoke has accurate spellcheck. It offers style guides, punctuation check, and grammar check. One thing I really liked was that corrections are displayed above the error, vs the error only being marked or highlighted. Whitesmoke can be used in Microsoft Word and in your web browser. The pricing is acceptable.

Nachteile:

I had problems keeping documents in their original format and I've noticed that the grammar check and punctuation check aren't always accurate. Whitesmoke doesn't offer a free version.

Software gefunden in