Was ist IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere?
Verbessere die Rentabilität softwareintensiver Produkte oder Services, steigere die IT-Produktivität und senke die Gemeinkosten.
Wer verwendet IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere?
Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt
Wo kann IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere bereitgestellt werden?
Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop)
Über den Anbieter
- 2010 gegründet
Erhältlich in diesen Ländern
Über den Anbieter
- 2010 gegründet
Erhältlich in diesen Ländern
IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere – Videos und Bilder
Kosten ähnlicher Produkte wie IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere vergleichen
IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere
IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Funktionen
- Audit Trail
- Berichterstattung / Analyse
- Grafische Benutzeroberfläche
- Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung
- Stakeholderdefinierte Attribute
- Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
- Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Alternativen für IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere
Bewertungen über IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere
Suite of development tools.
Kommentare: My experience with IBM rational has been positive during my development career. It has stayed abreast of new technologies and development methodologies in software engineering.
The software is incredibly powerful for large-scale software development projects. I can't think of any features we needed that were not included in this tool suite.
Well very powerful it also requires dedicated staff to keep up and running and it is very expensive. This would only be used by large-scale organizations.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Enterprise SCM and Planning
Kommentare: I've been managing IBM Rational Team Concert for almost 6 years and was able to customized it and support our developers successfully. Support is responsive at most.
RTC includes both SCM (Source Control Manager) and Scrum/Lean Planning both highly customized and linked that is you can force a code to be delivered only after code review (also included) and connected to a planned task owned by the developer and aimed for current sprint plan. As a centralized SCM you are protected from the check-in level. It also has a data warehouse DB being used by the Jazz Reporting Service (also included) which makes it a well designed product.
It currently has only Eclipse and MS Visual Studio client support which causes an out of the developing tool solution for developers. No offline mode. Not enough community support.
Obsolete interface, but does the job
Used to track software change and support requests in a highly regulated environment. Bland integration with Source Code Management systems, supports attachments, notes and estimations. Nice search/query tools and good configurability. There are way worse tools out there...
Maybe not in the latest versions, but the interface is old and text fields won't stretch. If you have some longer text you'll better copy/paste from a proper text editor. Integration with Source Code Management is achieved with a java tool that breaks if there are particular characters in tickets names, and forces to search and click the ticket at every source code check-in. The integration is nothing more than copying the commit log in a section of the ticket. Licenses are probably expensive, because we often reach the maximum number of concurrent (logged in) users and that means you can't use the software. You have to log out and retry. Session duration hence is short and even if you're logged in, you can't click a link to a ticket, it opens another window that's not logged in.
Complete, feature rich, requirements management software
Kommentare: DOORS, once learned, is a powerful and critical tool for defining requirements, maintaining requirements, as well as tracing to verification and validation. It is an essential tool for engineering development in any regulated industry.
DOORS is the most complete and most widely used requirements management software. For medical devices, as well as other highly regulated industries, requirements management is a critical business function. DOORS provides the functionality, traceability, and validity to manage requirements and produce the documentation needed to meet the regulations. DOORS features reduce the risk of missing key requirements, verifications, validations, as well as the flexibility to understand the project as a whole. Managing cross functional reviews of requirements, multiple stakeholders, as well as linked requirements is a huge task that DOORS makes possible with minimal errors. A huge challenge in requirements management is traceability. Tracing requirements to verification, validation, as well as risk analysis, can be very confusing and is prone to errors, but with DOORS these connections can be explicitly defined, and reports or trace documents can be created directly. Also, DOORS scripting allows users to create output documents which can be used as artifacts for the quality system, and shared directly with regulators during audit and for regulatory submissions.
DOORS has an extensive feature set that covers the whole requirements process. However, these features are not always intuitive to learn. It takes experience to master all of the functionality, and it takes time to become a DOORS master. This is a massive software tool, extensive training or first-hand experience is necessary before it can be used to its full potential.
Good option for requirement tracking.
For Business Analysts, IBM rational tool is good option to track requirements. Moreover it has support by known vendor so there should not be any issue with customer support.
I would recommend to use this for relatively small projects.
Our team use this software to track/manage the high level business requirements in a common repository. This tool is great option for managing common requirements for different customers. This software is user friendly. It is easy to track the status, charts, and taking the reports. This makes project management easy.
People find difficult to work on the RTC, when they are new to it. Exported reports are mostly in CSV format. It become difficult to extract information for complex reports. Software lacks the training materials for freashers.