Du bist nicht sicher, ob AutoCAD Architecture das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Weitere gute Alternativen zu AutoCAD Architecture
Bewertungen über AutoCAD Architecture
AUTOCAD = sehr selbsterklärend und einfache Bedienung
Kommentare: Zufrieden aber könnte auch noch besser sein ;)
= sehr selbsterklärend und einfache Bedienung , Befehlsleiste zum Suchen in der Praxis auch für die Kurztastenkombi sehr benutzerfreundlich
Die Erzeugung von Planköpfen ist komplizierter und bei REVIT besser gelöst ;)
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Is AutoCAD Architecture Worth It?
Kommentare: This software always brings out the creative in you. It is always coming to the rescue when I least expect it so I plan on using it furthermore in the future.
This software comes with tools that allow me to model my buildings in 3D and comes with loads of options on how to create a set of architectural drawings. I can manipulate physical properties with certain parameters and drive the geometry accordingly by changing the value in the properties palette. I can even create door and window schedules based on components that are in the model I'm working on.
I really wish that AutoCAD (VANILLA) and AutoCAD Architecture were integrated as one sometimes, it would make my life so much easier.
Good choice for architectures out there
Kommentare: Created by the pioneers in CAD Autodesk, AutoCAD Architecture is designed for creating 2D and 3D modeling purposes. This serves its purpose as an architecture software with many specific tools and features to effectively create a design. And this needs a powerful device to run and will have some issues with compatibility and sudden crashing. But overall this serves its purpose, fast, effective, and precise in creating a design.
As with all other Autodesk software, AutoCAD Architecture comes with many great and innovative features to aid the user in creating the perfect design. Unlike typical architecture software, this is quite easy to use and has a good user interface to effectively use the software. And in my personal opinion, this has the precision element which is lacking in many other designing software. With adding more architecture-related features to typical AutoCAD, AutoCAD Architecture has become more helpful easier to create architecture designs. Considering the views, snapping, properties panel so far this is the most helpful and effective software for architectures. Especially many tutorials are available for anyone willing to try it.
Incompatibility with some other CAD software was a major disadvantage for AutoCAD Architecture and sometimes it crashed just after opening the files. And it was quite expensive to use. Also, the user interface was somewhat unfriendly considering some other applications. Finally, unlike AutoCAD, this was using more resources to perform.
AutoCAD Architecture - Great at what is does
The software offers a comprehensive set of design and drafting tools tailored specifically for architects. It simplifies the creation of architectural elements such as walls, doors, windows, and roofs. The intelligent objects in AutoCAD Architecture are parametric, allowing for easy manipulation and editing. The software streamlines the documentation process for generating floor plans, elevations, sections, and other construction documents. Annotation tools are robust, allowing users to add dimensions, tags, and other annotations efficiently.
Collaboration can be challenging when working with professionals who use different design software. Compatibility issues may arise when exchanging files with users of other CAD platforms, potentially leading to data loss or formatting problems. AutoCAD Architecture may not be the best fit for every architectural project. Some users find that other software, such as Revit, better suits their needs.
Way too overpriced also not compatable with older versions
Kommentare: Too many clients need to have you save it down to a previous version. It is harder to customize than the older versions of CAD or Autocad alternatives.
The only pros about it is that everyone uses it so it can be used to open drawings from other firms.
It is not fully compatible with free-cad or Draftsight applications, it will give an error message saying the file was not created by an Autocad application even though there is nothing wrong with it and the file opens fine after closing the warning box. The biggest problem is sending files to people with earlier versions of CAD, they make it where you have to either buy a new copy of Autocad each year or the people sending the file have to save it down to your Autocad version. They have also eliminated or made it difficult to have auto-cad classic view instead of the ribbon. The new Xref manager is horrible unless you remember to type xrefclassic. The newest versions are also slow even on the newest PCs with core i7 processors and higher amounts of RAM.