--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über AssociationVoting zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AssociationVoting Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Wahlsoftware](/directory/31217/voting/software) > [AssociationVoting](/software/172696/associationvoting) # AssociationVoting Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172696/associationvoting Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) > Webbasierte Abstimmungslösung für Verbände zur Verwaltung ihrer Nominierungen, Online-Wahlen, Sammlung von Vollmachten und Papierwahlen. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 179 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet AssociationVoting? Berufsverbände, Handelsverbände, Hauseigentümervereinigungen, Eigentümergemeinschaften und mehr. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 179 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: AssociationVoting - **Region**: Howell, USA - **Gegründet**: 2004 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 99,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Kanada, Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Authentifizierung von Stimmberechtigten - Befragungs-/Umfragemanagement - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Beteiligungsverfolgung - Datenanalyse-Werkzeuge - Feedback-Management - Gedruckte Stimmzettel - Gewichtete Abstimmung - Kandidatenprofile - Kundenspezifisches Branding - Live Results Sharing - Mehrere Fragetypen - Nominierungen - Online-Abstimmung - Online-Umfragen - Stimmzettelmanagement - Umfragen/Abstimmungen - Wahlmanagement - Wählermanagement ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Wahlsoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31217/voting/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Wahlsoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31217/voting/software) - [Befragungssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31220/polling/software) ## Alternativen 1. [NemoVote](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203575/nemovote) — 4.8/5 (72 reviews) 2. [Vevox](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/185114/vevox) — 4.8/5 (419 reviews) 3. [SurveyLegend](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/156752/surveylegend) — 4.6/5 (966 reviews) 4. [eBallot](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172194/eballot) — 4.1/5 (19 reviews) 5. [Echo360](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172761/turningpoint) — 4.2/5 (44 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Phenomenal email polling" — 5.0/5 > **Fleur** | *23. September 2024* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I am a big fan of AssociationVoting because of its email polling feature. With a quick link to our polling station, our clients can poll in easily. > > **Nachteile**: It has been a phenomenal experience and I got no dissatisfaction with it. ----- ### "Great customer service and easy to implement" — 5.0/5 > **Dave** | *27. Oktober 2025* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Great customer service and fast responses if I needed assistance. Great UI for members to use for their voting needs. I also really like the voting report to use to track member engagement year over year. Great built-in features to replicate past elections to keep the settings the same. > > **Nachteile**: Not many cons. There is a little learning curve but AssociationVoting staff are so responsive it's very easy to troubleshoot. > > Very positive. Over the years, different leaders at my organization have asked about exploring different voting options, and as the staff member who administers and executes the elections, I am always a proponent of continuing to use AssociationVoting\! ----- ### "Best Value and Quality Voting Softeware" — 5.0/5 > **Jim** | *20. Januar 2026* | Bürgerliche & soziale Einrichtungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: For the most part, the learning curve on the AssociationVoting software was relatively short. Customer Support was quick and accurate whenever we needed guidance. After evaluating 21 different eVoting software packages, AssociationVoting proved to be the best value for our money. The system allows for customization of the login procedure through a user-friendly table, which is one of the biggest advantages we found compared to the competition. This feature enabled us to guarantee one vote per household (per our bylaws), even though multiple email accounts exist within each household. > > **Nachteile**: The terminology used for “campaigns” took a little time to understand at first, and I had to contact Customer Support to fully grasp how this feature worked. In this system, a campaign simply refers to scheduled voter reminder emails that are automatically sent at specific points during the voting window (for example, at the beginning, middle, and end of the voting period). If this feature were titled “Scheduled Voter Reminder Emails,” I believe it would have been more self-explanatory and easier to understand. > > Overall the AssociationVoting system was easy to set up and it has user-friendly interfaces that keeps track of the voting. ----- ### "Simple and Reliable Voting Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. Juni 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I liked most was how easy it made the voting process. Setting up elections and collecting votes was straightforward, and members could participate without needing much guidance. The platform also helped keep everything organized and transparent. > > **Nachteile**: The interface could feel a bit dated in some areas, and a few settings took some time to figure out. Adding more customization options and a more modern design would make the experience even better. > > Overall, I had a positive experience using AssociationVoting. It simplified election management, made voting convenient for members, and helped ensure the process was fair and organized. While there are a few areas that could be improved, it has been a reliable solution for our needs. ----- ### "Notes on AssociationVoting from a Staff User" — 3.0/5 > **Jingyao** | *28. Juli 2026* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: For context, AssociationVoting is the only election management tool I've used, so I don't have much experience or insight with other platforms to have a strong opinion. I will say, as a staff member who inherited this platform from a past administrator with no instructions, it is a self-teachable tool. This year, we ended up in a strange situation where two elections were needed. The customer service line was great. The representative was super helpful and explained things clearly, walking me through what was needed to hold two elections. The process wasn't ideal, but the representative provided friendly and quality service. > > **Nachteile**: I mentioned that the platform is self-teachable, but it's not intuitive. The guides are very wordy, and I think more visual prompts would be helpful. For example, there are so many prompts for personalized language, but it's not always clear where a user will see the prompt and how it would appear on their screen. It requires extra time to create test voter profiles just to see how things appear on the voter's end. > > Again, I don't have experience with other platforms, other than as a voter for another membership association I'm a member of. I think my experience as a staff member who helps manage the election has been a bit mixed. I don't think it's a difficult platform, but I can see how it might be challenging for others to manage, which is something I think about as we work toward transitioning election management to a volunteer member committee. I'm not opposed to keeping AssociationVoting as our platform for another year or so. ----- Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/172696/associationvoting) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten