Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Was ist App Builder?

Indigo.Design ist ein flexibles System, das UI-Prototyping, Designsysteme, Stakeholder-Kollaboration, Nutzertests und Codegenerierung integriert. Führe Nutzerforschung durch und erhalte frühzeitig Feedback, bevor du codierst, um kostspielige Iterationen zu vermeiden. Erstelle Wireframes und Prototypen in der Cloud zum Testen und erfahre, wie Nutzer interagieren, Bildschirm für Bildschirm oder per Video. Die gemeinsame Plattform ermöglicht eine nahtlose Kollaboration zwischen Design- und Entwicklungsteams, um Innovationen zu beschleunigen, Zeit zu sparen und Kosten zu senken.

Wer verwendet App Builder?

Indigo Studio bringt Designer, Entwickler und Anwender für kollaboratives Design, Prototyping und Usability-Tests für kleine bis große Unternehmen zusammen.

App Builder Software - 1
App Builder Software - 2
App Builder Software - 3
App Builder Software - 4

Du bist nicht sicher, ob App Builder das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

App Builder

App Builder

4,2 (94)
1.675,00 $
Jahr
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
58
4
4,4 (94)
4,1 (94)
4,2 (94)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
5,00 €
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
14
8
4,5 (761)
4,7 (761)
4,2 (761)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu App Builder

draw.io
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Daten-Import / -Export
Diagramm-Erstellung
Drag-and-Drop
Adobe XD
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Design-Management
Drag-and-Drop
Prototyp-Erstellung
Sketch
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Design-Management
Designvorlagen
Drag-and-Drop
InVision App
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Design-Management
Drag-and-Drop
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Visio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datenvisualisierung
Diagramm-Erstellung
Drag-and-Drop
UXPin
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Prototyp-Erstellung
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Wireframe-Kreation
Axure
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Drag-and-Drop-Editor
Software-Prototyping
Wireframe-Kreation
Bubble
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Einsatz-Management
Für die No-Code-Entwicklung
Workflow-Management
Figma
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Design-Management
Drag-and-Drop
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit

Bewertungen über App Builder

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,2
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,2
Funktionen
4,0
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,1

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
41%
4
45%
3
12%
2
1%
1
1%
Pavol
Pavol
UX Designer in Tschechien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

There isn't any prototyping tool with this kind of animation capabilities. The best for the money.

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

There is a lot of intuitive features for interactive prototyping, usability testing, and collaboration. You can copy/paste your designs from Sketch and animate your interactions in any possible way.

Nachteile:

Occasional bugs and slow performance on larger projects, probably because of MS Silverlight. There should be more features (like in Sketch) for high-fidelity design and typography. I still think its the best solution for the money. kind of animation capabilities, there is only Axure RP, which is expensive and way less intuitive.

Audrey
Business Analyst in Kanada
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A picture is worth a thousand words,..an Indigo Studio prototype is worth a million!

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: As a business analyst, my main aim is to make sure that clients and developers share a common understanding of the requirements and functionalities. Indigo Studio has been an invaluable tool to define and refine requirements and interactions with stakeholders and communicate these requirements to the development team.
I started using Indigo Design while it was still on beta at a previous job and had a great experience with it. When I got the chance to select a prototyping tool at my new job, I chose Indigo Design, knowing it would allow to quickly and easily create prototypes and be easy to learn for future team members regardless of their technical or design background.

Vorteile:

- Easily create interactions: Indigo's greatest strength is indubitably the ease with which it allows to simulate interactions. You can create simple interactions by creating states triggered by events in just a few minutes without having to be an expert UX/UI designer or a developer. - Easy to share with stakeholders and team: The link sharing capabilities allow stakeholders and team members to access the prototype, interact with it and comment. - Easily reuse elements with screenparts: Screenparts allow to define elements once and reuse them throughout the project whenever applicable instead of having to redo the element over and over. - Useful icon library: The icon library allows to better illustrate some concepts as well as to add some style to prototypes without having to look for images.

Nachteile:

- No versioning capabilities: There is no direct way to save a version of the published prototypes and be able to share a working version with other people as functionalities and tweaks are added by a stakeholder while the development team is working on the previously defined scope. - Collaboration functionalities: the collaboration functionalities are essentially limited to publishing and downloading, meaning everyone is using a copy of prototypes and "screenparts" instead of having a common base. It would be great to be able to build a library of reference elements shared with a team. - Limited text formatting options: This is a less critical issue but being able to format table cells would allow to show that some elements are hyperlinks for instance.

Pankaj
Pankaj
User Experience Designer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Öl & Energie
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Provide some key features like usability testing which is missing in lot of projects

3,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: -Make High fidelity wireframes quickly and present it to stakeholders.
- Reusable components and sharing is easy

Vorteile:

- Easy to Use - Key features like designing for different break points, Usability Testing, export screens as PNG , Downloading as HTML

Nachteile:

Crashes very frequently Customization of components like textbox, dropdown is not possible. Software becomes slow once the files get heavy

Wesley
CEO in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great product

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: It makes working with clients and developers much easier and makes us look a lot more professional.

Vorteile:

Integration with Sketch makes it easy to share wireframes and prototypes with clients and for developers to get the specific information they need to build the UI.

Nachteile:

I love the code generation concept. However, it is limited in what it can code. Some of the features we want to use (basically aspects that adjust the screen in some ways like a side navigation bar and accordion) are not supported. Would love to see them expand the list of supported components.

Colin
Consultant in USA
Versicherung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great UI design tool

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall I think the experience is pretty good, the learning curve is normal and easy to learn it in a short time and integrate with the existing process.

Vorteile:

Easy to use, and intuitive process to create the UI prototype. Like the feature to easily create the shared component and reuse them in different design. Easy to share with the end users to evaluate the usability.

Nachteile:

A bit difficult to allow collaboration across teams as multiple team members working on one project. Also wish to have more out-of-box templates available.