Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden
Strapi
Was ist Strapi?
Erweitertes Open-Source-Node.js-Content-Management-Framework, um ohne Aufwand eine leistungsfähige API zu erstellen.
Wer verwendet Strapi?
Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Strapi das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Strapi
Weitere gute Alternativen zu Strapi
Bewertungen über Strapi
Strapi - a great API builder and a bad site builder
Kommentare: Generally Strapi is a great tool with the aim to be a robust CMS for large projects. I have use it to build/manage site which include live streaming, media portals and ecommerce. The "managing" part is fine, but most of the advanced functionality has to be coded additionally.
Vorteile:
Strapi - as the name suggest - is an API builder tool which helps you to manage data that is being consumed by frontends and other apps. This functionality is done very well. Strapi provides hooks and cycles to modify data coming in and out of it. But these need to be programmatically configured. Good thing is the Strapi authentification layer and CDN for images.
Nachteile:
As Strapi does not provide you with a Frontend it is hard to get the initial concept and add functionality. Every change in the Admin triggers a restart of Strapi and basically means downtime. Sometimes the database gets vacuumed while you try to work with endpoints. This can very frustrating. Same as the responses from Strapi which include nested objects and those are hard to orientate in while consuming the data.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Strapi is a super flexible, low startup cost solution
Kommentare: Absolutely love it, once I found the answers to some key questions it all just worked, and I could build my first website very rapidly. Strapi was in fact the easiest thing to learn!
Vorteile:
- The self-hosted option is simply incredible, especially for smaller companies or in our case, non-for-profit - Easy to setup, does what you need without being complicated - Third party integrations make Strapi an extremely flexible solution for many project types - The API is really easy to use, from setup to a working site in mere minutes
Nachteile:
- Documentation could be improved, especially around production deployment and a few more common use examples in the filtering/populate space ahead of the real complex examples already there e.g. relationships or depth - A type reference to explain how to use or access for example TypeScript types for things like Rich text (blocks). Shouldn't need to find solutions outside Strapi to do this. - This is the same for all CMSs. Cloud hosted plans for small businesses / non-for-profit / infrequently updated sites.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Promising but difficult to deploy and use
Kommentare: While I was very positive about trying Strapi the Docker image problem soured it and I found alternatives that worked better.
Vorteile:
Open source, we can host it ourselves, active community, lots of features and extensions.
Nachteile:
The Docker image is one major version behind but this is not made clear until you've spent hours trying to get it all working and then check the forums.
Once of the best content management systems out there
Kommentare: I'm using Strapi for two projects of mine and the overall experience so far is very positive. Although, I wish the process of creating custom plugins and admin pages was easier.
Vorteile:
I really like the Content-type Builder and how Strapi generates all the needed API endpoints.
Nachteile:
If you decide to host Strapi on your own server it's not very easy. Also, there's a learning curve when it comes to creating custom plugins.
Great for Landing pages
Kommentare: I have been using Strapi for 3 years and it is a product that I am trying to push to others everytime they need a solution. I mainly use Strapi for frontend site and I rarely use it as an API to an app. But for content management, Strapi beats products like Contentful and Sanity in my eyes because it is open source and you can host it anywhere you want.
Vorteile:
To be able to create an API for landing pages in a matter of hours. I created many types of section for my landing and I could start integrating my frontend the next day. My site grew ever since and Strapi made it super easy to add more sections and evolve with time.
Nachteile:
One of the main thing I don't like about Strapi is the fact that it doesn't have a good way to be updated easily. I am using a deployment system and I wish I could update it from the admin panel itself. I need to use the command line and to redeploy everytime there is an update. Updating something frequently should not be something negative, but it is with Strapi because I am always in need to keep it up to date. The only other thing, is the lack of Responsive on the admin panel.
