Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Was ist RealPage IMS?

Investor Management Services (IMS) ist eine Softwareplattform für Investorenmanagement für CRE-Eigentümer und Investmentfirmen. Die Firma hat über 500 Kunden, die Tausende von Stunden für ihre über 75.000 Investoren in wertschöpfende Aktivitäten verwandeln konnten. Die IMS-Plattform wird für die Verwaltung von über 45 Milliarden $ Eigenkapital verwendet Kommerzielle Immobilienfirmen nutzen IMS, um Zeit und Ressourcen zu sparen, den Wert zu steigern und die Anlegererfahrung zu verbessern.

Wer verwendet RealPage IMS?

Die IMS-Plattform wird von kommerziellen Immobilieninvestmentfirmen zur Verwaltung ihrer externen Investoren verwendet.

RealPage IMS Software - 1
RealPage IMS Software - 2
RealPage IMS Software - 3
RealPage IMS Software - 4
RealPage IMS Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob RealPage IMS das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

RealPage IMS

RealPage IMS

4,5 (79)
1.000,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
55
7
4,2 (79)
4,4 (79)
4,6 (79)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
475,00 €
Jahr
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
352
13
3,9 (1.609)
3,8 (1.609)
3,8 (1.609)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu RealPage IMS

NetSuite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aktivitäts-Dashboard
Duplizierte Zahlungswarnung
Gewinn-und Verlustrechnung
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
CRM
Kontakt-Datenbank
Kundendatenbank
Zoho CRM
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
CRM
Echtzeit-Daten
Hilfe Desk-Management
Juniper Square
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Daten-Import / -Export
Investment-Tracking
Kundenportal
AppFolio Property Manager
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Buchhaltung
Miet-Nachverfolgung
Mieter-Nachverfolgung
RealPage
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Buchhaltung
Finanzmanagement
Mietmanagement
AppFolio Investment Manager
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Investment-Tracking
Kundenmanagement
Kundenportal
ResMan
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Buchhaltung
Miet-Nachverfolgung
Online-Zahlungen
Shape
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Kontaktmanagement
Sales-Pipeline-Management

Bewertungen über RealPage IMS

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
68%
4
24%
3
3%
2
4%
1
1%
Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Immobilien, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A true game changer for our business

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Huge time savings through automation of many investor-related processes. We are able to have staff focus on higher-level analytical as a result. Investors love all-in-one nature of the platform and really like the UX.

Vorteile:

From day one we have really liked ACH distributions, waterfall calculations, CRM/email campaigns. We are very excited about the investor statements and capital call features.

Nachteile:

We were very early clients so the functionality at the beginning wasn't as robust in the beginning as it is now. They are excellent about getting client input as they roll out new features.

Robert
principal in USA
Immobilien, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

IMS Bugs

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

the functionality of having an org chart as part of the build. the visual helps.

Nachteile:

the system feels cumbersome. it takes a lot to build things out. recently there was/is a bug in the "commitment" feature which rendered it useless. as our company grows this is a critical feature and with it being non-functional it severely diminishes the benefit of IMS to the point of looking at other options. The commitment did not "push" new investors to complete their profile information as it was in the past, or should be and is through other streams within IMS. this resulted in new investors signing blank forms and the entire process having to be rebuilt, and redone. It made our company look very inexperienced in front of our new customers.

Tommy
General Partner in USA
Immobilien, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Falling behind on features

3,0 vor 9 Monaten

Kommentare: It was a good platform for our first foray into an investor portal, but the missing features quickly made it difficult for us to continue staying with the same platform.

Vorteile:

The user interface for our investors was simple and easy to use. The features that the portal did have were intuitive as well.

Nachteile:

There were just a lot of missing features like the ability to collect ACH payments within the portal and the ability to seamless verify our investors' accreditation statuses. The IMS team didn't really seem interested in building these features that their competitors are starting to offer.

Sherwin
Partner in USA
Immobilien, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

RealPage AIM IMS Review

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: The customer service is awesome. Our relationship manager, [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN], has be great at responding to our emails and questions in a timely manner and setting up calls to go over the application. More "hands on" webinars and classes would be very helpful.

Vorteile:

The ability to create trust and transparency with our investors by providing them information about their property and finances.

Nachteile:

It's a bit of a learning curve to learn the application. The office hours and webinars are great and very helpful.

Jennifer
Director of Operations in USA
Immobilien, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent Data

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Due to the data captured in IMS, we are able to more easily provide data to our CPA for K-1 production. This has reduced the spreadsheets we would otherwise have to maintain. The functionality available for investors to complete Subscription Booklets online and obtain proof of Accreditation via VerifyInvestor has also been a huge improvement for us and our investors and has allowed us to raise as much as $27MM in equity in one month (fully complete/accurate paperwork; fully funded). In addition, the type of data we are able to collect at the CRM Contact level as well as at the investing entity level has helped us market to our investors appropriately whether we are doing a 506(b) or a 506(c) type of deal.

Vorteile:

In looking at several products, the most important aspect for me is data. Is the type of data that I need to be able to search on or analyze later available for data capture? I look at functionality next. For us, IMS provides the best data out there for a company who raises Private Equity (we focus on Multifamily real estate). Although the user interfaces and functionality have not been as slick as some of the other products we have seen, upon deep review of those other products, they just do not collect the level of data we need them to. IMS has also been working to makeover their UIs to make them more intuitive and streamlined from a functional perspective. One of the other strengths in this software that I love is that IMS tends to build functionality where, as a sponsor, you can turn certain data or functionality on or off if it doesn't work for your company's processes/procedures. This provides flexibility that allows their multiple sponsors to handle certain processes and displays differently based on their specific needs. I have not seen this offered on other tools to the degree it is available on IMS. This is a great strength in this tool and huge win for the multiple sponsors.

Nachteile:

In the past one of our biggest issues we ran into was functionality deployed that was not fully tested or where existing functionality was not fully regression tested. As a result we would run into bugs. However, this has changed dramatically in the past year. IMS is really taking care to fully test what they deploy.