Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist InsightVM?

Die Vulnerability-Management-App mit einem Risikoergebnislevel von 1 bis 1.000 untersucht dein Netzwerk und zeigt mögliche Bedrohungen auf.

Wer verwendet InsightVM?

Für Organisationen, die eine umfassende Sicherheitsplattform suchen.

Du bist nicht sicher, ob InsightVM das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

InsightVM

InsightVM

4,4 (17)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
6
Keine Integrationen gefunden
3,8 (17)
3,9 (17)
3,7 (17)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
4.800,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
89
10
4,9 (19)
5,0 (19)
5,0 (19)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu InsightVM

vRx
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Automatische Patch-Implementierung
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Schwachstellenbeurteilung
Qualys Cloud Platform
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Nessus
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Netzwerk-Scanning
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Schwachstellenbeurteilung
Orca Security
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Schwachstellen-/Bedrohungs-Priorisierung
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Schwachstellenbeurteilung
SanerNow
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Korrektur-Management
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Schwachstellenbeurteilung
Snyk
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Korrektur-Management
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Schwachstellenbeurteilung
Nexus Lifecycle
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Dashboard
Einsatz-Management
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Cyber Hawk
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Vulcan Cyber
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.

Bewertungen über InsightVM

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,4
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,8
Kundenservice
3,7
Funktionen
4,2
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,9

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
65%
4
18%
3
12%
1
6%
Nguyen
Nguyen
System Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Many features, object management is good

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: The hardware requirement is a lot. The cloud is not helping much. If they can do everything on cloud is so good. We don't have to maintain the On-Premise server

Vorteile:

Manage by Sites and Asset group is good. Because we can assing user to that site or group. Which is other software does not have

Nachteile:

It seems difficult to use. I have to search everywhere just to scan 1 assets. It spent about 1 hour just to do a test scanning . After scan, the report is not automatically generated. You have to do it yourselft

Suchibrato
Security Analyst in Indien
Halbleiter, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

InsightVM review - Analyst perspective

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

The tool is relatively easy to pickup, is feature-rich and is a leader in its category.

Nachteile:

Scan templates creation and management is a bit difficult for first time users. Interface isnt that user-friendly.

Ron
USA
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Bloated NMAP scanner

1,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: 1. Tech support is awful. Just god awful. I installed their appliance OVF's. They also have direct Linux and Windows installers if you prefer to load your own OVF's. Every single case I submit, I say I am running the Nexpose Appliance. Every single time they ask me what I am running (Windows or Linux). Are they just that dumb over there? 2. Scans die. I did my initial discovery scans. Worked OK at most sites except a couple which kept dying. I ran them a couple times and they finally finished. I didn't bother calling support. See #1 above for why. I then tried to run initial Full Audit scans. Only one of my 8 sites completed. I can't wait to call tech support to find out!! LOL This is not a cheap product. It works so poorly that it is quite disgusting. It is VERY obvious that the internal processes at Rapid7 are horrible at best. I'm going to ask for my money back and go with another product. Note: Too bad I couldn't demo this product firsthand (try before you buy) but Rapid7 is very inflexible in that manner.

Vorteile:

Absolutely nothing at this point.

Nachteile:

Doesn't work. Tech support horrible. Accessing logs horrible. Just overall terrible software.

Simon
Systems Administrator in USA
Finanzdienstleistungen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent product by an excellent company

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I trialed Nexpose Community when our company started moving to a cloud hosting provider. I was very impressed. We ended up going with another provider, but when that contract expired, I proposed that we give InsightVM a shot instead of a renewal, remembering how much of a pleasure it was to use. Now, we're customers, and I don't regret my suggestion at all. I deployed a security console within an hour, and had it ingesting an inventory of every host in our cloud environment, whether Active Directory knew about it or not. Everyone from Compliance to IT speaks positively about it. They like the intuitive UI, the ability to get actionable data the moment the dashboard loads, and the fact that it's fully aware of both Microsoft and third-party vulnerabilities. I like the "risk score," a practical alternative to the typical CVSS rating. While the CVSS score is important, Rapid7 weights their score on factors such as practicality of exploitation and active targeting in the wild. I've suggested that we prioritize remediation based on the Rapid7 risk score rather than the CVSS score. I installed the Insight agent on a majority of our workstations, which sends data about any published vulnerability to the portal, whether in a Docker image, a third-party application, or the underlying OS. A couple customizations of the dashboard, and now we see comprehensive overview of the week's priorities at logon. It's great to have one dashboard for every environment!

Vorteile:

Easy to install, intuitive UI, integration with cloud portal, agent (that feeds data to the cloud analytics portal), multi-platform.

Nachteile:

Nothing -- Rapid7 is KILLING it. Since this field has a minimum length: maybe the only downside is that the security console requires a decent bit of RAM? I had to give it 8 GB to ensure stability. That said, it's running a web-based management interface, and the scan runtime is far faster and more reliable than our previous solution.

Tushar
Tushar
Lead security Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

One of th best VM tools in the market

4,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

InsightVM has good asset discover and management modules along with vulnerability scanning , management, exception modules and integration with different ticketing tools make it one of the best tools for VM.

Nachteile:

Reporting features needs to be improved along with the removal of false positives. For Cisco devices, we faced a long line of false positives which even when contacted support team was not fixed.