Kontent.ai

Switched from Umbraco to Kentico Kontent

Kommentare: Experience has been great. Technical documentation is good, and the example projects in various languages has been helpful.

Vorteile:

Flexibility of content taxonomy, ease of implementation, speed of Delivery API, excellent tech support.

Nachteile:

It is up to the client to determine how best to structure their content's taxonomy. There is a lot of flexibility in Kentico's Admin Portal, so some "best practices" and recommendations from Kentico would be helpful.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Butter CMS und Sitefinity

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Kontent.ai: Good feature set, reasonable licensing fees, hosted infrastructure.

Ability to explore a variety of features

Kommentare: As a headless CMS, it allows us to have enormous flexibility to be creative and explore different features. We do need help from developers to ensure we are able to deliver a product that follows our brand guidelines, and is also compatible with all required APIs.

Vorteile:

I love the flexibility that Kontent ai provides us to build templates to cater for a variety of syllabuses we need to publish.

Nachteile:

I dislike that in Kontent.ai we are not able to replace a file without getting a new url for it, which makes it very hard to manage content linked to the resources.

Kontent Review

Kommentare: good

Vorteile:

pretty straight forward from a user perspective, very flexible and adaptable

Nachteile:

Requires loads of dev time to make basic changes and implement features that would be out of the box in other instances.

Kontent.ai: our stable, fast and scalable CMS

Kommentare: Using this now 3 years. TCO is ok. It's a stable CMS and our website is fast on the front-end, thanks to our static rendered pages. As we have chosen for MACH architecture, Kontent.ai is the perfect CMS system.

Vorteile:

Stable, scalable, fast, roadmap, new functionalities, good documentation, multi-language , intuitive GUI, etc

Nachteile:

I would be nice to be able to copy certain content from 1 environment to another. But luckily you can copy an entire environment to another if needed.

Excellent support and delivery

Kommentare: From the moment we started talking to Kontent.ai we were thrilled with the support and assistance. They understood our needs and tailored solutions to support us. Now in place we are finding that Kontent.ai is supporting our needs and we have made significant improvements and savings as a result.

Vorteile:

Ease of use, team help and support. Pre-purchase support.

Nachteile:

Nothing. Yet. If one thing, perhaps that the way we overwrite tour info by departure year under one tour name is confusing. For now.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Bynder

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Kontent.ai: Support and features from Kontent.ai vs. Bynder