Wer nutzt diese Software?

Research sites and sponsors. For sites, an enterprise tool to streamline operations and improve productivity. For sponsors, a data platform for centralized monitoring.

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

10 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 5 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 5 / 5
  • Kundenservice 5 / 5
  • Funktionen 4.5 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 5 / 5

Produktdetails

  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Kostenlose Testversion Nein
  • Einsatz Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training Persönlich
    Live Online
    Dokumentation
  • Kundenbetreuung Support während der Geschäftszeiten
    Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • Clinical Research IO
  • https://www.clinicalresearch.io/
  • Gegründet 2015

Über Clinical Research IO

An intuitive eSource, lab routing, and CTMS solution for research sites. Using CRIO, sites can save favorite procedures; build own source templates; capture source data quickly and accurately; mark up labs; and share visits with their monitors for review. Recruiting helps manage patients and campaigns, and enables one-click calling and texting. Finances calculates receivables and invoiceables as the visits are being completed. We are a premium service at an affordable price.

Clinical Research IO Funktionen

  • 21 CFR Part 11-Compliance
  • Dokumentenmanagement
  • Elektronische Datenerfassung
  • HIPAA konform
  • Patientendatenbank
  • Personalbeschaffung-Management
  • Registrierungs-Management
  • Studienplanung
  • Terminplanung
  • Überwachung

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Clinical Research IO

Super efficient, friendly support, proactive company focused on site needs & industry demands.

Bewertet am 2.11.2017
La W.
Founder
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: The time spent in clinic and entering data has been cut to less than half. We are continuing to learn about all of the functions of this software and have not been dissappointed in anything yet. The capabilities are endless and the cost is affordable. Big pharma should jump at the chance at having real time data available. This has been a game changer at our site. We only have 2 coordinators so we were limited in our study load. We have doubled our study load within 6 months of starting with CRIO. You will not find a single system that offers all that CRIO does and for the price too!

Vorteile: This is the creme de la creme of clinical research software. There are so many modules and training that it will take some time to get used to but you will never be sorry. If you seriously commit to learning and using this system you will save so much time from capturing data real time to decreasing errors and deviations. I absolutely love the reponse time from the CRIO team and the "live chat" feature has saved our site from having any major meltdowns due to the learning curve. Our site is almost completely paperless thanks to this amazing software.
Comments from CRA's : "this is the wave of the future"
"your site is so far ahead in the game, why aren't all sites using this?"
" what is it called again?"
The game changer for our site was the financial tracker module. We are a small site so using Fresh Books, an EMR, a CTMS, and entering data in respective EDC's took an incredible amount of time... time wasted entering data trifold and trying to track what we are owed vs paid & costs to our vendors , study staff etc.
Major bonus points for this system that our site was not looking for was the recruiting module. This system is truly a one stop shop. Better is efficiency in what we do, how we do it, without compromising the integrity of the data. Data entry errors across multiple systems compromises data, creates queries and wastes time. CRIO does interface with other data systems making data entry at the site occur one time. Imagine that!

Life Changing!

Bewertet am 12.4.2018
Chelsey M.
Quality Control Director/Research Team Manager
Forschung, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: This software significantly helps with patient management. All in one system that is easy to use.

Vorteile: User-friendly! I love that this program makes following protocol requirements for study visits a breeze! It is extremely easy to make adjustments (for example if there are protocol amendments) and the software takes away the stress of forgetting things like re-consenting patients or follow-up evaluations of AEs. Groundbreaking for the research industry!

Nachteile: In regards to the cons, I have little/nothing to note. Customer service has been very responsive and easy to talk to; they have resolved most of my issues immediately.

Excellent clinical research software with great value for the cost.

Bewertet am 13.11.2017
Ryan L.
Clinical Research Manager
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
4/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Vorteile: -UI is very clean and easily navigated.
-Source creation that is simple for anyone with some advanced features.
-Frequent updates and improvements.
-Payment model that makes sense for research sites.
-External logins allow monitors to leave comments directly on the eSource form!

Nachteile: -Simplistic source creation doesn't lend itself to specific needs. As an ophthalmology practice, best-corrected visual acuity is impossible to adequately and efficiently capture on this platform. That said, I haven't seen a system that can do much better.
-They took an interesting approach of starting with a complicated form and simplifying it as you answer questions rather than vice versa. I don't dislike it but would prefer the alternative for the purposes of clinical research.

One of the best User experiences in Research and Software I have experienced.

Bewertet am 11.1.2018
David S.
President & CEO
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Vorteile: It is both online (website) and available in an App. Since October 2016, we have experienced zero downtime. Even better: the have an integrated Chat feature...which they answer, respond to, and fix any/all issues, and answer all questions.

Nachteile: When we started with CRIO, they did not have an integrated database we could use for recruiting. They do now. When we started, they did not have a financial component we could use to track work done. They do now. The only outstanding issues are: no regulatory component and no ability to consent patients with CRIO.

I have worked with CRIO eSource first as a CRA and then as a site owner for Clinical Trials.

Bewertet am 30.4.2018
Takoda R.
Clinical Project Manager
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
4 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: Improved data quality while decreasing the time required to manage a study.

Vorteile: In my experience the strongest feature of CRIO's eSource is the ability to review data remotely. As both a CRA and a site owner, remote data review is imperative to ensure patient safety, data quality, and to identify any potential errors as quickly as possible. CRIO streamlines Clinical Research data collection to cut down on Study Coordinator and CRA time all while decreasing unnecessary user errors. There customer support has been very strong and I look forward to seeing there software adopted on a larger scale in Clinical Trials.

Nachteile: CROs have not made it a requirement for studies yet. Once CROs are mandating CRIO's software across all research sites for a given study, the CRO's will be able to effectively standardize data collection and truly achieve their goal of being able to perform risk-based monitoring.

Lies weitere Bewertungen