--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über HackerOne zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerOne Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Penetration-Testing-Tools](/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) > [HackerOne](/software/165190/hackerone) # HackerOne Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/165190/hackerone Page: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/165190/hackerone?page=2) > HackerOne ist der Industriestandard für Hacker-gestützte Sicherheit. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 12 users. Top-rated for **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 12 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: HackerOne ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Available Countries**: Belgien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Island, Kanada, Luxemburg, Niederlande, Norwegen, Schweden, Schweiz, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich, Österreich ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Bedrohungsanalyse - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Compliance Management - Netzwerk-Scanning - Priorisierung - Richtlinien Managemen- - SQL-Injektionen - Schwachstellen-Scannen - Schwachstellen-Schutz - Schwachstellenbeurteilung - Simulated Threat Attacks - Störfallmanagement - Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization - Web-Application-Security ## Integrations (23 total) - AppSec Education Platform - Assembla - Bitium - Duo Security - Freshdesk - GitHub - GitLab - Jira - JumpCloud Directory Platform - JupiterOne - MantisBT - Microsoft Teams - OTRS - Okta - OneLogin ... and 8 more integrations ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Penetration-Testing-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Penetration-Testing-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) - [Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31062/vulnerability-management/software) - [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32775/vulnerability-scanner/software) - [Sicherheitssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31037/cybersecurity/software) - [Netzwerksicherheit Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30003/network-security/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Action1](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180609/action1-rmm) — 4.9/5 (237 reviews) 2. [ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/185510/manageengine-vulnerability-manager-plus) — 4.6/5 (31 reviews) 3. [Orca Security](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/188445/orca-security) — 4.8/5 (60 reviews) 4. [baramundi Management Suite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/177946/baramundi-management-suite) — 4.6/5 (140 reviews) 5. [Automox](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148872/automox) — 4.7/5 (152 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "HackerOne Saves Me From Product Disasters" — 4.0/5 > **Wes** | *4. Dezember 2025* | Computer-Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's user interface is very intuitive. Has a large community of seasoned security reviewers. Generates clear reporters making bug tracking and collaboration quite easy. Great resources to learn from. > > **Nachteile**: Initial setup for a new project can be difficult and take quite a lot of time. Time taken to prioritize report's significance is often quite significant. Report quality isn't consistent, can vary wildly. > > I submit programs to HackerOne to find bugs that seem to be otherwise undetectable. It's been very effective in this capacity and I've avoided any bugs being exploited in a fielded product. ----- ### "Expensive and not fair to researchers, low ethics" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *8. September 2021* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: They're in a leading position, which means the top researchers want to work with them > > **Nachteile**: 1) the only people you'll get to talk to as a client are sales people, with no knowledge of security or tech. 2) I don't like the way they collaborate with researchers: in their first level of the program, you pay a huge amount of money to the company, but it doesn't get distributed to the researchers at all. Their argument is that researchers go into this program to gain ranking points, until they have enough points to reach the next level and gain access to programs where they'll be paid for their reports. It's like working as an unpaid intern for years, just for the glory, until you maybe get access to a paid job. I think it's totally unfair to hackers who work really hard to find meaningful vulnerabilities. They have to do it as a graduation step, because HackerOne is in a leading position and will twist their arms ----- ### "Hackerone Bug Bounty Platform" — 3.0/5 > **Mohit** | *21. Juni 2020* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - Easy to use and submit a report. - Quick validation for critical and severe vulnerabilities. - Public disclosure is offered by very less platforms so its one of the big pros. > > **Nachteile**: - My report was validated and bug was triaged and in a few days the bug was patched. But the report was assigned to a new member and he stated that it was triaged by a mistake. The injection was although minor but was valid so I think there should be some good validation process around it. > > Not that good. Nothing offered not even badges for duplicate valid bugs. Thus I go for private programs that directly work on the reports. ----- ### "Theory Number One" — 5.0/5 > **Camencia** | *9. Juli 2025* | Rundfunkmedien | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I am trying to get into the Cyber Security field. Every since I used the demo, I have decided to use this platform for my clients because of the ease of data collection. You don't have to search all over the platform for information. It is basically handed to you in one pile. > > **Nachteile**: At this time I have not discovered anything dislikable. I have yet to cross this bridge, however, I am going to be in search of. > > I was impressed with the new features. I can only imagine how much harder it was to work with the older version. I was thinking it was new software until I did some research. ----- ### "hackerone review" — 4.0/5 > **Michal** | *16. Juli 2025* | Buchhaltung | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The concept is really good, as it allows competition amongst independent hackers to do security audits of your application > > **Nachteile**: The results may vary as it depends on the participants that take part in auditing your applications. Sometimes there are more sometimes less ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/165190/hackerone?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/165190/hackerone) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data