Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Visual LANSA?

LANSA ist das ursprüngliche Low-Code-Tool zur schnellen Anwendungsentwicklung für Mobil-, Web- und Cloud-Entwickler. Über 7.000 Unternehmen vertrauen der LANSA-Plattform, um Unternehmensanwendungen mit der Geschwindigkeit von Low-Code zu entwickeln. LANSA bietet eine einsprachige IDE, um Client-seitig, serverseitig und alles dazwischen zu generieren. Ein LANSA-Benutzer ist praktisch ein Full-Stack-Entwickler. LANSA verfügt über 30 Jahre Erfahrung mit Produkten und Dienstleistungen, die die Produktivität von Softwareentwicklern drastisch verbessern.

Wer verwendet Visual LANSA?

Für IT-Experten, die Web- und mobile Apps für Unternehmen schneller, einfacher und zu geringeren Kosten erstellen möchten.

Visual LANSA Software - 1
Visual LANSA Software - 2
Visual LANSA Software - 3

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Visual LANSA das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Visual LANSA

Visual LANSA

4,6 (19)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
38
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,2 (19)
4,2 (19)
4,5 (19)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
25,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
76
18
4,8 (23)
5,0 (23)
5,0 (23)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Visual LANSA

Studio Creatio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen
Workflow-Management
Simplifier
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Debuggen
Quellkontrolle
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Plant an App
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen
Einsatz-Management
Workflow-Management
engomo
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Entwicklung von Web-Apps/mobilen Apps
Integrationsmanagement
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
WaveMaker
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Quixy
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Formularerstellung und -design
Für die No-Code-Entwicklung
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Flowfinity
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Joget DX
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
OutSystems
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Debuggen
Entwicklung von Web-Apps/mobilen Apps
Quellkontrolle

Bewertungen über Visual LANSA

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,6
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,5
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,2

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
58%
4
42%
Jon
Jon
Senior Technology Consultant & Owner in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Lansa changed my whole development cycle

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We use Lansa for all new development ranging from iSeries green screens to Windows native to cross-browser web development to Mobile. It has turned staffs of mixed talent to single cohesive teams.

Vorteile:

Time to deployment and reduced investment in having to always learn new skills to keep up. Historically, as interesting as it is for developers to learn new tech and find ways to engage the user and make things easier, this learning curve is time consuming and costly. It also does not insure consistency from developer to developer or adherence to standards. Lansa literally removes all of that. The developer is extracted from that layer and only has to focus on a single development environment that continues to improve and present simple ways to accomplish the latest technologies. It even insures adherence to standards through its common repository and wizards to create many of the most common processes. To take this whole picture to the next level, all of the code is portable, not only from system to system, but between OSs! If your company is using an iSeries and decides that it is time to move to another platform; you can move with it. No new learning curves. No re-development. Pick it up and move it over. I can't emphasize enough how valuable these traits are in environments that do not have the luxury of time and money to continually retrain.

Nachteile:

Hang on tight with the training. Its important and well worth it in the end. But it is easy to get bored with. I find documentation to be sufficient if you have the basis of the training. Once you are through that and understand the concepts and the language, its gold.

steve
IBMi Developer in USA
Bibliotheken, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

20+ years and it's never let me down

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: exceptional. i've said many times "if you can't do it in Lansa, you probably don't need to do it." (at least in a business application - you won't write an image processor or a protein sequence analysis program but you can probably integrate with the back end data.) the recent acquisition by Idera has given some pause to the community (there were a flurry of exits from long-timers as well) but so far it seems to be working out.

Vorteile:

it's not just the software - it's the entire Lansa ecosystem. been using it for over 20 years and it is hands down, the best business software development platform (especially for the IBMi) i've ever dealt with. it's flexible, intuitive, and can do make integration easy and FAST. (side by side, doing something in Lansa vs develop something in RPG or COBOL is 2-3x as fast and 10x more intuitive). in the 20 years, it has always been able to keep up with what needs to be done in the business (and i've seen the product evolved from a green screen, SEU/PDM like interface to one that you can develop robust windows, web, and mobile apps with).

Nachteile:

IDE can be a bit slow (especially when you've just started it) and is a few steps behind a visual studio type interface.

Antwort von LANSA

vor 4 Jahren

Steve, Wow! It is really great to hear how Visual LANSA has been a reliable solution for you for over 20 years. Thank you for sharing your feedback on the IDE. We are always looking for ways to improve our product.

Robert
Senior QA Engineer in USA
Medienproduktion, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Order Entry Platform for 18 Years

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Ultimately satisfied our business and user needs.

Vorteile:

Satisfied our order entry GUI needs for our entire enterprise for over 18 years, and still going.

Nachteile:

Ultimately we needed stronger integration and easier deployment options, and are slowly phasing out our LANSA GUI.

Antwort von LANSA

vor 4 Jahren

Robert, How great to hear Visual LANSA has been solid for you for 18 years! Are you on our latest version? 14 SP2 is geared toward easy integration and deployment. Even be on the lookout for some updated features to your concerns really soon.

Benzy
DBM in USA
Rechtsberatung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best Low Code Development Software in the Market

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Used Lansa tools to solve new and or existing business flows and logic. Used Lansa to switch over from various legacy systems (G/L, order entry, sales etc...). Back a few years we also used Lansa Integrator to interface with Lotus Notes database to create a uniform experience - which including using the data between the two platforms for web applications.

Vorteile:

Reusable code. Really, reusable code. Write once and rules follow the data around without the need to re-code depending on the interface. Transparent enforcement of the business rules and logic. Can write as granular as needed for your specific requirements. Once that has been accomplished you can concentrate on UI design and coding.

Nachteile:

To many ways to skin a cat with the options to tackle problems. It's great working with various interfaces but sometimes there is limited (or no) documentation to those interfaces (such as when MS released Office 16, little information avaliable to access Excel .net newer features).

Antwort von LANSA

vor 4 Jahren

Benzy, We are thrilled Visual LANSA is making a positive impact on your application development process! We are working hard to address our issues with limited documentation. We have some exciting improvements coming in the near future!

Joe
LANSA Application Developer in USA
Personalbeschaffung & -besetzung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Reduces technical baggage and allows you to focus on solving business problems

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: By reducing the amount of technical baggage typically associated with web development, the time from conception to production is radically reduced. This also means that I can focus significantly more of my effort on solving business problems then solving technology problems.

Vorteile:

I thing I like the most is being able to leave the technical baggage behind and really focus on solving problems for the company. For example, a full stack developer has a host of technologies they have to master to be effective and efficient at their job. If you are developing modern, responsive web applications chances are you are using something along the lines of Angular, React, Ember etc. Besides being yet another thing to know, it brings compilation, packing and deployment issues to the front-end development process. I don't worry about this any more. I develop a component and Visual LANSA handles the compilation, packing and deploying it to the browser for me. On the back-end side you have other frameworks to know. You've got to handle requests with WebAPI, MVC or Spring etc. You have to handle data access with Entity Framework, JPA, Hibernate etc. Then you may have an IoC container bringing everything together. With Visual LANSA Server Modules handle the request and you have just a handful of commands to interact with the database. All of the underlying plumbing that you normally have to deal with is removed as Visual LANSA takes care of it. One last thing that is really nice is the Visual LANSA Framework. If you are doing back office web development, i.e. not consumer facing, then the "Framework" becomes a huge time saver. Its essentially a "Shell" that you plug your components into and it handles all the complexities of the UI for you.

Nachteile:

The thing I like the least is the debugger. The debuggers in Visual Studio, IntelliJ, Chrome's Dev Tools etc, set pretty high expectations and this where I think Visual LANSA could use the most help. Performance when debugging web components is pretty poor. Debugging non-JavaScript based objects like Server Modules, Functions, Windows Forms etc. is good. It's just JavaScript based components that seem to bog down and make stepping through code a very time consuming process. One example is not being able to inspect the contents of a list. You can see how many entries are in it, but you cannot see those entries without iterating the list. This typically leads to a lot of trace messages and essentially debugging through tracing.