Durchschnittliche Bewertung7 Bewertungen
- Gesamt 3.4/5
- Benutzerfreundlichkeit 3/5
- Kundenservice 3.9/5
- Funktionen 3.3/5
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4/5
- Kostenlose Version Nein
- Gratis Testen Nein
Cloud, SaaS, Web
Angaben zum Hersteller
- Gegründet 1996
Bietet Organisationen die Vorteile von Echtzeit-Planung und schneller Kommunikation durch die Verfolgung, Priorisierung und Koordination von Aufgaben.
- Elektronische Unterschrift
- Käuferseite (Lieferanten)
- Tracking der Beschwerde
- Verkaufsseite (Kunden)
- Vorgefertigte Vorlagen
- Öffentliche Aufträge
Die hilfreichsten Reviews für CLM
Bewertet am 21.12.2018
Vorteile: Collaborative Lifecycle Management series of tools - CCM, RM and QM are great for managing the complete software development lifecyle.
Nachteile: There is nothing in the tool that can be marked as least likeable.
Bewertet am 26.5.2017
Contract negotiations require the management of workflows. CLM does a great job.
Kommentare: Efficient and effective way to manage contracts. Eliminates unnecessary paper - great for the environment. Workflows to Business Owners of the contract terms for their approvals - filing for easy retrieval for future audits. Management of the contract negotiations eliminates version control which will eliminate unnecessary work or worse, acceptance of a term your Company did in error.
Vorteile: Setting up the Business Unit Approvers to ensure proper workflows. Approvers modifications and/or approvals of specific contract terms are files and kept in archives for any future retrieval. Paper is minimized. Version control mistakes are minimized. Electronic signatures. Contract filing for easy retrieval. Must more efficient and effective than the "old fashion" way of hard copy contracts, printing, signing and putting in PDFs. Look forward to the continued improvements. Worthwhile.
Nachteile: Support different internet browsers such as Internet Explorer - though outdates many people still use IE. No true highlighting capacities - use this when wanting to call out a term to a customer. Sometimes lagging issues when typing. Confident these are small hurdles that will be resolved over time.
Bewertet am 18.5.2017
CLM is limited by its editor that does not utilize MS Word, but improvements are being made.
-Integrates with Salesforce and DocuSign
-Standard contracts and their associated workflows are preloaded in the tool saving time
- Has a parallel approval feature with a dropdown list of Subject Matter Experts to choose from to easily progress the workflow to multiple individuals at the same time for collaborative redlining
-Manages contract renewals
-Features a standard clause library
-CLM does not utilize MS Word and there are some feature limitations with the editor used
-While collaborative redlining is in use, there is no solution to easily identify possible conflicts
-A Word plugin is required to incorporate offline redlines back into the CLM workflow
-Dashboard and Reports need improvements such as filtering capabilities and the ability to report on who is assigned the contract in a parallel approval
-Administrative functions should have more built-in efficiencies to help very large customers with many standard contracts make updates more easily
Bewertet am 23.5.2017
I helped test this in my org and the idea is great, but we did experience a lot of bugs.
Vorteile: I like the idea of the tool and the ease of managing contracts with multiple people having to review.
Nachteile: We had some issues with versions and formatting contracts for our org specifically. The tool could be a little more intuitive as well and easier to learn.
Bewertet am 24.5.2017
In the RFP role we work with Terms and Conditions that often need to be reviewed/red lined.
Kommentare: This tool provides housing for customer contracts and terms and conditions.
Vorteile: It is great to have a tool that will store customer contracts and terms and conditions so they are not randomly on employees hard drives.
Nachteile: Typically in the contract review process the legal team and many other business segments will need to review and red line terms and conditions as well as sending them back to the customer. The process was good in theory but was difficult to get everyone on board to go in and utilize the tool.