IntegrityNext

A very efficient platform for compliance review

Kommentare: A successful experience for me as a user - a very good and intuitive functionality which makes the platform easy to use

Vorteile:

It is very simple to use, nice UI, comfortable use

Nachteile:

Nothing to complain about, overall satisfied.

Access all company sustainability info in one place

Kommentare: Seemless!

Vorteile:

Find what you're looking for in seconds. Well categorized. Can easily retreive prior assessments as well to compare & contrast.

Nachteile:

Nothing yet, as it has been seemless thus far.

First use due to customer request

Kommentare: Another declaration platform in the jungle of information exchange platforms. Another login and account data. Another system, which requires going to your office cabinet to read your hand-written manual ...
For me it is the first contact with this system. We did not buy this software, we are information supplier for FläktGroup in this case.

Vorteile:

Basically it is easy to use. Guiding through the different sections seems to work.

Nachteile:

Upload of CMRT form has been refused by the system! No option to get help or information how to solve the problem. I sent the CMRT directly to qhse@flaktgroup.com (sender address of the demand for FläktGroup) since there was no instruction what to do in this case. I received no feedback - don't know, if the information has reached the right recipient...

Fair Portal - Supplier Qualification Program

Kommentare: I was impressed about how integrity next handled questions relating to SAQ modules that were now straight forward to answer. They took the matter seriously and discussed it with the contracting customer. Well done. As an admin from the supplier side, this is a much appreciated and needed response.

Vorteile:

Rather than the software, I really appreciate the support provided by the portal provider - this is very untypical, yet highly valuable coming from the supplier side. Some of the questions could not be answered as proposed by the platform, as our products are engineered to order and not catalogue ware. My feedback was taken as an incentive to improve future Supplier Qualification Questionnaires, taking supplier portfolios into account, rather than force suppliers to answer as expected or else be penalized.

Nachteile:

The software is not really an issue, as I only worked with the SAQ to date. In general, many SAQ's don't take supplier type, size and complexity into account, or the questions are so general, that a clear answer is not possible (e.g. regarding Conflict of Interests: can we confirm that no family member or close relative of our executive board member is involved in any conflict of interest….for a privately owned customer this would been interviewing cousins, in-laws, partners, children….even parents of executives. This in my opinion is not feasible.

Easy to use, though the rating logic needs to be improved

Vorteile:

The software is easy to use and comprehensive.

Nachteile:

Focus on the rating systems relies heavily on certifications, which are not relevant to all types of businesses. Hence the software is pretty much focused on production suppliers and less on service suppliers. The GDPR and Data Protection rating is nonsense in the way it is implemented as it basically gives a green light for European only data processing and a red light for everything else. This does not reflect by any means what GDPR requires and how a Data Protection analysis is assessed.