--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Inovalon Provider Cloud zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Inovalon Provider Cloud Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Arzt-Abrechnungssoftware](/directory/30026/medical-billing/software) > [Inovalon Provider Cloud](/software/162841/inovalon-provider-cloud) # Inovalon Provider Cloud Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162841/inovalon-provider-cloud Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162841/inovalon-provider-cloud?page=2) > ABILITY Network hilft Anbietern und Zahlern die administrativen und klinischen Schwierigkeiten der Gesundheitsversorgung mit Workflow-Tools zu vereinfachen. > > Bewertung: **2.5/5** von 37 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Bedienkomfort**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Inovalon Provider Cloud? Revenue-Cycle-Führungskräfte, Praxis-Manager, Rechnungssteller und Mitarbeiter der Verwaltung, Förderfähigkeit, Vorautorisierung, Reklamationsbearbeitung, Wiederaufbereitung sowie Überwachung der Kostenerstattung. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **2.5/5** | 37 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 2.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 2.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 2.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 2.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 30% | (3/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Inovalon - **Region**: Minneapolis, USA - **Gegründet**: 2000 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 250,00 $ - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Ansprüche nachverfolgen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Code- & Gebühreneintrag - Compliance Management - Compliance-Verfolgung - Elektronische Ansprüche - Rechnungshistorie - Reklamationsabwicklung - Risikobewertung - Schadensprüfung - Zahlungsabwicklung - Überprüfung der Versicherungsberechtigung - Überweisungsbescheid ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Arzt-Abrechnungssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30026/medical-billing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Arzt-Abrechnungssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30026/medical-billing/software) - [Schadenmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [EZClaim](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/106348/ezclaim-medical-billing) — 4.5/5 (128 reviews) 2. [Tebra](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/129169/tebra) — 3.9/5 (1362 reviews) 3. [ChiroFusion](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/142407/chirofusion-complete-practice-management) — 4.7/5 (589 reviews) 4. [ModMed](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/124590/ema) — 4.4/5 (364 reviews) 5. [Jane](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/178984/jane-app) — 4.8/5 (496 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Very pleased with ease of use for outpatient rehab" — 5.0/5 > **Raegan** | *6. Dezember 2017* | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We've found them so easy to use. We've been using this for over 12 years and transitioned from transmitting via single phone line to web based transmissions. Our primary use is to transmit Medicare claims. Never had any problems in the years we've been using them. We are always contacted personally in regards to upgrades in software and the changes being made. > > **Nachteile**: Being with them for so long, we've seen the price increase over time. While it really hasn't been that bad, especially compared to other software, it has steadily gone up with a new increase just this month. > > The ease of use and the dependability are top notch. ----- ### "Inovalon is truly top in the market\!" — 5.0/5 > **Scott** | *1. August 2024* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy to use, free remits and tons of analytics and reporting. Take a look, its definitely worth it\! > > **Nachteile**: The do try and sell you their full RCM platform but ive found its worth it. > > Great customer service, US based. Everyone is super friendly and quick to respond. They are competitive with their pricing. ----- ### "Poor service" — 1.0/5 > **Jason** | *25. März 2026* | Alternative Medizin | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > As a healthcare provider, I place a high value on professionalism, clarity, and respectful communication—especially when coordinating services that impact patient care and operational efficiency. Unfortunately, my experience with this company’s customer service has raised several concerns. Interactions with support staff have at times felt dismissive and unprofessional. Simple, reasonable questions have been met with responses that lack clarity, accountability, and courtesy. In some instances, communication has come across as defensive or condescending, rather than solution-oriented. This type of engagement does not meet the standard expected in a professional healthcare environment, where collaboration and respect are essential. Reliable, responsive service is critical, and when that is not consistently delivered, it becomes a significant concern. Based on my experience, I would strongly encourage others to carefully evaluate their options. In contrast, Office Ally has demonstrated a higher level of professionalism and reliability in similar interactions. ----- ### "They did not provide what they promised" — 1.0/5 > **CINTYA** | *5. August 2020* | Unternehmensberatung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 1.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We are a DME supplier and signed up with them because they claimed they were CEDI preferred network service provider/clearinghouse for Medicare Jurisdiction D. Everything was going well till the first claim was created and rejected for enteral feeding. We are to attach a CMN to our claims for enteral feeding patients and they have it on their system and its a simple form that is filled out that is it. I only bill four codes for every patient only four and every claim has been rejected by the intermediary, them. Stating i am missing something a certain code. > > **Nachteile**: So far let me say i have not been able to transmit any enteral feeding claim to medicare. Medicare doesn't receive the claims. When my contract was renewed i told them i was adding new products and that i needed to be able to bill to medicare jurisdiction d and have the cmn electronically attached. they assured me that it wont be a problem. it has been since April and i have made calls spoke to different techs and issues have been escalated and till today i have not heard back. i also have medicare eligibility features and not once have i been able to verify patient eligibility. I try to get a hold of our account rep and he doesn't return my calls or emails. Tried upper management and nothing gets resolved. > > So now i am paying a monthly fee of $180 per month and since i could not transmit my claims i had to sign up with cortex edi. So i pay double and i had more than 30 patients whos claims i had to miss out on payment due to timely filing because my claims are always being rejected. I told them what they need to do. I told them what was the problem. I even had a developer that is ansi x12 experienced look at my 5010 claim and he explained it to me and i explained it to them but its like no one knows better than they do, so they ignored me. ----- ### "Find another company" — 3.0/5 > **Janet** | *13. Mai 2025* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy to use. They are nice when trying to get you to sign a contract, but once the contract is signed they are horrible. > > **Nachteile**: Customer service is the worst ever. Their prices are outrageous. They are not interested in working with their clients. They were still allowing our past clients to use services we were paying for and when it was pointed out, we were told it was not costing any extra for the past clients using it (like we should not be upset that we were paying for other people's services). > > Not at all good. I would not recommend them to anyone else. I will be happy when we can get rid of them. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162841/inovalon-provider-cloud?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162841/inovalon-provider-cloud) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten