--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Aspiration zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Aspiration Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Performance-Management-Systeme](/directory/30061/performance-appraisal/software) > [Aspiration](/software/162385/aspiration) # Aspiration Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162385/aspiration Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162385/aspiration?page=2) > Eine Talentmanagement-Lösung für das Leistungsmanagement mit Tools für Überprüfungen, Berichte und Nachverfolgung mit Sitz in Südafrika. > > Bewertung: **4.4/5** von 54 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Aspiration? Jeder Sektor. Der Schwerpunkt liegt hauptsächlich auf dem Getränke- und Erdölsektor. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.4/5** | 54 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Aspiration Software - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 50,00 ZAR - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Portugiesisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Botsuana, Eswatini, Ghana, Kenia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mosambik, Nigeria, Sambia, Simbabwe, Südafrika, Tansania, Uganda, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Äthiopien ## Funktionen - 360-Grad-Feedback - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Beurteilung der Kompetenzen - Bewertungszyklen tracken - Dashboard - Fortschrittsverfolgung - Goal Setting/Tracking - Lernpfade/-verläufe - Management von Performance-Auswertungen - Mitarbeiter-Datenbank - Portal für Lernende - Self-Service Portal - Tests/Bewertungen - Umfragen & Feedback - Zertifizierung und Lizenzierung ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk ## Category - [Performance-Management-Systeme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30061/performance-appraisal/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Performance-Management-Systeme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30061/performance-appraisal/software) - [360-Grad-Feedback Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30666/360-degree-feedback/software) - [Lernplattformen](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Paylocity](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1927 reviews) 2. [BambooHR](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/110968/bamboohr) — 4.6/5 (3546 reviews) 3. [Hrider](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/211585/hrider) — 4.9/5 (90 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13644 reviews) 5. [Qulture.Rocks](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/192315/qulture-rocks) — 4.5/5 (158 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A great tool business" — 5.0/5 > **finch** | *29. Juni 2022* | Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Aspirations performance meets expectations in minutes, easy to use and objective > > **Nachteile**: I can not say a word because I am satisfied no bug detected so far ----- ### "SKAP Review" — 4.0/5 > **Morian** | *5. Mai 2026* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - Progress tracking - Various options e.g weekly, monthly. - Assessor training guide. - Ease of use. - Guides are easy to be printed. > > **Nachteile**: - Some guides are not updated depending on the current situations . Some Learning objectives are not customised to a specific business unit. - No consolidated report that can clearly show when assessment was done and for which learning objectives. > > It is a user friendly system with clear and direct Learning objectives tailored towards a specific role. There is ability for an individual to do more than one SKAP Guide thus first Skill growth. ----- ### "Terrence Pillay's review of Aspiration" — 2.0/5 > **Terrence** | *20. Mai 2026* | Essen & Trinken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 1.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I enjoy the visibility of seeing the NYA and NYC. I can quickly navigate to outcomes I need to approve. > > **Nachteile**: It hangs frequently. In order complete my outcomes, I have to dedicate time for this. I find that the system often freezes and I end up saying I will come back. > > Poor, interface is not very intuitive and the connect to the server is very unstable. It could be the internet speed but it happends very frequently. ----- ### "Aspiration survey/ Feedback" — 5.0/5 > **Chinah** | *5. Mai 2026* | Essen & Trinken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The way the questions are structured and the way assessments are done is exceptional indeed. Great improvement from the previous years > > **Nachteile**: The way the reporting reports are structured, not easy to navigate. This can be improved in terms of simplifying the reports. > > Good for training and empowering the Frontline. This promotes one of our values - Autonomous Teams, to allow our shopfloor to run the operation on their own ----- ### "A new chapter of learning." — 5.0/5 > **Octavius** | *11. Mai 2026* | Essen & Trinken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I found most valuable, effective, or helpful while using the software in a real work environment. Based on the surrounding fields (ratings, cons, and overall experience), this section is meant to showcase strengths such as learning opportunities, safety awareness, ease of access, performance tracking, or how the system supports daily work tasks. Reviewers are encouraged to explain specific features or benefits rather than giving very general praise. The purpose of this question is to help other potential users understand what Aspiration does well and why it may be worth using. Clear, experience‑based responses make the review more useful and balanced when paired with the “Cons” and overall experience sections. > > **Nachteile**: the practical drawbacks, such as workload, time consumption, usability issues, repetitive tasks, confusing questions, or features that could be improved. The goal is not to criticize unfairly, but to provide constructive feedback that helps other users make informed decisions and helps the product improve. This section also has a minimum character requirement, encouraging thoughtful and specific answers rather than short complaints. Writing clearly about what worked least well increases the credibility of the overall review and ensures it reflects real‑world usage rather than only positive impressions. > > helps me provide a comprehensive reflection on how the platform functions in real workplace conditions. This section goes beyond listing individual strengths or weaknesses and instead encourages a balanced summary of daily usage, learning value, and overall satisfaction. Reviewers are expected to explain how Aspiration supports key organizational goals such as employee training, safety awareness, compliance, and performance tracking. It also allows users to reflect on how intuitive the system is, how engaging the content feels, and whether it contributes positively to professional development. At the same time, this field gives space to mention limitations, such as the time required to complete tasks or the effort involved in answering detailed questions. By combining positive outcomes with practical challenges, the review becomes more credible and useful to others. Ultimately, this prompt serves as a final verdict, helping potential customers understand not only what Aspiration does, but how it feels to use it consistently in a working environment. The goal is to offer honest, experience‑based insight that supports informed decision‑making for me. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162385/aspiration?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162385/aspiration) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten