Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist 1000minds?

Mit der 1000minds-Software kannst du verstehen, was den Menschen wichtig ist – mithilfe von Conjoint-Analysen und diskreten Auswahlexperimenten.

Mit einem besseren Verständnis und einer besseren Entscheidungsfindung kann sich die Welt zu einem besseren Ort entwickeln. Daher hilft diese Lösung Unternehmen, Einzelpersonen und Gruppen dabei, herauszufinden, was für die Menschen wichtig ist, und bessere Entscheidungen zu treffen. Dabei kommen die Anwendungen des Unternehmens zur Online-Conjoint-Analyse und für MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) zum Einsatz.

Wer verwendet 1000minds?

Jeder Markt, der gute Entscheidungen treffen möchte oder an den Präferenzen seiner Kunden oder Stakeholder interessiert ist. Diejenigen, die MCDM- oder Conjoint-Analyse-Software benötigen.

1000minds Software - 1
1000minds Software - 2
1000minds Software - 3
1000minds Software - 4
1000minds Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob 1000minds das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

1000minds

1000minds

4,9 (19)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
30
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,6 (19)
4,6 (19)
4,9 (19)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
55,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
104
27
4,5 (309)
3,9 (309)
4,3 (309)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu 1000minds

Alchemer
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Felder
Anpassbare Formulare
Umfragenerstellung
Microsoft Excel
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Daten-Import / -Export
Offline-Zugriff
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
SurveyMonkey
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Befragungs-/Umfragemanagement
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Umfragenerstellung
XM for Strategy & Research
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Fragen-Verzweigung
Umfragenerstellung
Pointerpro
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Test-/Quizerstellung
Umfragenerstellung
SurveySparrow
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Daten-Import / -Export
Umfragenerstellung
SmartSurvey
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Fragen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Umfragenerstellung
GetFeedback
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Formulare
Umfragen & Feedback
Umfragenerstellung
Delighted
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Daten-Import / -Export
Kundenerlebnis-Management

Bewertungen über 1000minds

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,9
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,6
Kundenservice
4,9
Funktionen
4,8
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,6

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
89%
4
11%
Jiri
Jiri
CEO in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great for managerial decision making

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We have used PAPRIKA model in 1000minds for many use cases including picking marketing strategy, budgeting, new employee team allocation.

Vorteile:

It is very easy to build evaluation case, involve others, handle decisions that would be difficult to make. Alternatives, we use, like real modelling, C5.0, Monte Carlo are way less agile, more time consuming (on a scale 100* times as expensive and slow to implement). 1000minds & PAPRIKA is awesome when you have given criteria, given options and want sorted solutions by score in a situation, where relationships between all criteria are murky.

Nachteile:

App gives you one answer of what's the best, second best... option (with score). This is what most people expect, so it's probably ok. But it doesn't have any "what if" analysis where you could for example clone some solution and modify some answers.

Henrik
Director in Neuseeland
Erneuerbare Energien & Umwelt, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Efficient and transparent decision making for complex systems problem solving

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: We use it for structuring team discussions so the participants are forced to declare and distill the fundamental criteria that underlie their trade-offs and priorities – the weights and investment priorities that emerge are immediately useful, but the method also builds group cohesion and understanding. We conduct formal Qualitative Analysis of transcripts of the group discussion recorded while the team performs the group experiment, so that outsiders can better understand the rationale behind the choices. Our outputs from 1000minds include formal peer reviewed science journal articles , confidential in-house reports for decision-makers, or sometimes just ways of building social capital in informal sandpit discussions of combatants that leave feeling heard and better about each other!

Vorteile:

1000minds provides an elegant, efficient and transparent way of reaching decisions about ‘wicked problems’ like sustainability that are contested by multiple ‘layers and players’ that all want their say. The software is flexible - decisions can be reversed, constraint customized, levels can be interpolated if time constraints forces their exclusion. Design features allow scientific reliability – there are modules for accuracy checking, tracing of the decision path, and filtering out junk responses from random clickers when used by individuals. The simulation module allows the user to design a practical experiment and predict the number of choices in advance. Cell phones can be linked to allow more effective and anonymized voting in group work. The underlying PAPRIKA algorithm makes the choice experiments as fast as possible so that concentration of the participants is maintained, so more trade-offs can be tested in each session. Best of all, the users have confidence in the outcome and process because software has proven credentials after years of use by diverse uses.

Nachteile:

The graphics and data reports produced during group sessions are difficult to read by people at the back of a large meeting room. We usually solve this by taking a pause once the choice experiment is complete in order to transfer the results to PowerPoint (bolder graphics, colored lines and fonts are needed for readability).

Priyanshu
Manager in USA
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

My experience with 1000minds

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: 1000minds is a powerful and effective tool for complex decision-making, but it may not be suitable for everyone due to its cost and limited integration capabilities.

Vorteile:

The software is easy to navigate and use, making it accessible to individuals with limited technical expertise. It allows users to create and modify decision-making models to fit their specific needs. The software provides instant feedback on the potential outcomes of different decision options, allowing users to make informed choices.It helps users weigh multiple criteria when making decisions, providing a comprehensive view of the trade-offs involved.

Nachteile:

The software is standalone and does not integrate with other tools, which may be limiting for organizations with complex decision-making processes.It is a premium tool and may not be affordable for smaller organizations or individuals.Although the software is user-friendly, there is still a learning curve involved in understanding how to effectively use it for complex decision-making.

Trudy
Senior Lecturer/Health Economist in Neuseeland
Forschung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A simple to use, low-cost, effective way to get the information you need to make decisions

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I have used this software in a wide variety of practical applications. The results have been the same every time. I have been able to survey large (and small) groups of people in a short space of time and gather the information that's needed to make decisions. The feedback from participants has been consistently positive "easy to use", "intuitive", "the results are as I expected"....

Vorteile:

The software has an intuitive design which makes it very easy to use, both from a developer's point of view in creating a survey and from a participant's point of view in completing it. Surveys can be designed to target specific audiences using the customisable options which means that the right information is being collected in a low-cost, efficient way. In-built quality checks ensure confidence in the data and is just one of the features that sets this software apart from others.

Nachteile:

I am yet to come across any cons with the new version of 1000minds.

Lesley
Physician in USA
Forschung, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

User-friendly program, outstanding support for clinical investigator and student

5,0 vor 10 Monaten

Vorteile:

I am a public health masters student as well as a practicing medical doctor working in clinical research. Under guidance from mentors who had experience with 1000minds, and as a project for one of my masters classes, we used the software for a discrete choice experiment to generate an additive decision rule to define the minimal characteristics of a clinician with osteoporosis competency. Prior to my work with 1000minds, I did not have previous experience working with conjoint analysis. As I was planning my project, I looked into both 1000minds and other software. As a comparison, I felt that 1000minds was more user-friendly and the support staff were much more engaged and helpful, even after just a few email exchanges. I found the 1000minds software extremely easy to use, the tutorials were quite helpful, and the 1000minds team very supportive. I met with members of their team several times via zoom to discuss my project and ask questions, and they were extremely responsive, eager to help and give suggestions.

Nachteile:

One suggestion might be to allow better branching logic in the final "pre-complete" phase when collecting participant demographics. Some questions may not apply to all participants.