Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Airbrake?

Airbrake bietet eine vollständige Stack-Anwendungsüberwachung, die dich in Echtzeit auf Fehler, die sich auf deine Nutzer auswirken, aufmerksam macht. Und du erhältst alle Kontext- und Ursachendiagnosen für Fehler, die schnell behoben werden müssen. Das bedeutet weniger Stress für dich und ein besseres Erlebnis für deine Nutzer. Airbrake unterstützt alle wichtigen Plattformen und Sprachen, lässt sich in deine bestehenden Workflow-Tools integrieren und wird von Tausenden von ausgezeichneten Ingenieurteams einschließlich Netflix, Salesforce, Oracle, Ebay, Twitch und Soundcloud verwendet.

Wer verwendet Airbrake?

Airbrake bedient Entwicklungsteams jeder Größe. Unternehmenspläne umfassen On-Premise-Installation und erfüllen alle Sicherheitsrichtlinien wie den HIPPA.

Airbrake Software - 1
Airbrake Software - 2
Airbrake Software - 3
Airbrake Software - 4
Airbrake Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Airbrake das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Airbrake

Airbrake

4,7 (30)
19,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
13
15
4,7 (30)
4,6 (30)
4,7 (30)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
7,75 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
160
20
4,0 (13.934)
4,3 (13.934)
4,2 (13.934)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Airbrake

Jira
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Agile Methodiken
Aufgabenmanagement
Projektplanung/Terminierung
BugSnag
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagnosewerkzeuge
Server-Überwachung
Überwachung
New Relic
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Echtzeitüberwachung
Überwachung
Rollbar
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Ticket-Management
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
DevSuite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Dokumentenmanagement
Workflow-Management
Caspio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datenmigration
Projektplanung/Terminierung
Workflow-Management
WaveMaker
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Quixy
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Formularerstellung und -design
Für die No-Code-Entwicklung
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen
Mendix
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Debuggen
Grafische Benutzeroberfläche
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen

Bewertungen über Airbrake

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,7
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,7
Kundenservice
4,7
Funktionen
4,7
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,6

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
70%
4
30%
Bryan
Bryan
Product Director in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Design
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

My Favorite Error Tracker for Webapps

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Airbrake has made error tracking easy for us and I enjoy that the interface and feature set continue to improve over the years.

Vorteile:

Airbrake is one of the items on our checklist to setup with every new webapp we create. The setup is fast and it provides immediate value. Being able to receive an email for a new error that comes in is indispensable.

Nachteile:

I would like to see Airbrake integrate with Kanbanery as that is our agile project management tool of choice. It does already integrate with Trello and Pivotal Tracker. Finally, while we use Airbrake on all of our apps, we do not always upgrade to a paid plan as it is simply more than we need. If Airbrake had one more lower tier paid option, then we would consider upgrading more apps to paid plans.

Rich
Engineering Manager in USA
Internet, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Airbrake is a great error monitoring product

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: We rely on Airbrake for additional production and test environment monitoring of app exceptions. By linking Airbrake error alerts to HipChat notifications, we get great high-level alerts whenever an error happens, right in our team chat room. It's easy to drill down into the error details with the UI. We also use the Comments feature of the Airbrake errors to reduce bystander effect among team members -- no comment means nobody triaged the issue.

Vorteile:

Great UI, easy to drill into the errors. It's great how they roll up errors of similar types intelligently. The "Occurrences" view is especially helpful, to know which errors are infrequent and which deserve higher attention.

Matthew
Lead Data Engineer in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A Long Running Service For Exception Reporting

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We used Airbrake for many years and found it easy to integrate it into projects with Ruby on Rails and other popular frameworks. Over time the company has shifted more towards using Rollbar which is compatible with Airbrake clients but had more advanced server side aggregation of errors and other search / filtering features that came in handy for us.

Vorteile:

It is easy to setup with popular frameworks like Ruby on Rails and Python. Its compatible with similar products which helps avoid vendor lock-in. The service has been running a long time and has established a track record of being reliable.

Nachteile:

It is a bit light on features compared to some of the newer competitors. The main decision points for me would be cost and how easily the UI allows you to access the information you need. I think there are competitors with a better UI and the pricing would probably depend on your team size.

Spencer
USA
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Powerful and easy to use! Plus, a great ROI

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Airbrake has been used by other teams in my organizations for quite some time. My team and I were building a new Rails application and we decided to include Airbrake for error reporting. Using Airbrake was one of the best decisions we made and here's why:
tl;dr - Installation, configuration, and integration were all painless. My only request is to expand supported integrations to more and different systems (New Relic, in our case).
1) App integration: "Installing" Airbrake in our Rails application was as simple as adding an entry in our Gemfile and creating an initializer for configuration. And that's it! 2) Configurability: As I just mentioned, configuration is available in your application. However, configuration "points" also exist in Airbrake at the account, project, and user levels. All these configurations work together seamlessly. This has allowed us to get the right notifications to the right people at the right time and avoid the "notification overload" that can come with other monitoring solutions. 3) External Integrations: Airbrake supports integration with many popular issue trackers and team communication solutions. We integrate Airbrake with JIRA and Slack, so there was no need to introduce a new tool to our daily workflow. However, I would like to see integration support expanded. For example, the integration with New Relic requires a third party solution that ended up not working for us. Airbrake does support webhooks, so we're still able to integrate with systems that are not supported OoTB. 4) Documentation: Setting up Airbrake and integrating it into our ecosystem has required little to no guesswork on our part.

David Eugene
David Eugene
Senior Quality Analyst in Philippinen
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Outsourcing/Offshoring, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Trace logs galore

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: since we don't have the luxury of time to debug and traceback every issue happening to our multiple sites, airbrake cuts so much time debugging and that time saved is better spent on working on a fix right away, sometimes even before the users notice anything.

Vorteile:

Our Devs love to sift through the detailed logs, if they put the airbrake code in their source properly. For me as QA, i can also traceback what scenario triggers a particular error log. if we don't have enough time to go inside airbrake, we can have email/slack alerts set up for specific issues, from specified environments. mute an expected alert is also possible, if needed. The dashboard is available with graphs and statistical data.

Nachteile:

probably too much information at times, like for a simple error message on the UI, there maybe hundreds of lines of backtrace info being sent. maybe not a very bad thing to have, but when the issues come in all at once, it's overwhelming that the users don't want to be inside the airbrake site anymore and just wait for user feedback, then check airbrake as last resort.