Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Submittable?

Optimiere deinen Einreichungs- oder Antragsprozess mit der cloudbasierten Software von Submittable. Akzeptiere, überprüfe und entscheide über unterschiedlichste digitale Inhalte mit der All-in-one-Lösung für Einreichungen. Submittable ist das perfekte Tool für Förderorganisationen, Marken- und Content-Manager*innen, Koordinator*innen von Stipendienprogrammen, Verlage und mehr. Submittable lässt sich mühelos so anpassen, wie DU es für deine Arbeit benötigst.

Wer verwendet Submittable?

Unternehmen, Organisationen, Stiftungen, Non-Profit-Organisationen und Verbände jeder Größe, ortsunabhängig. Nutze Submittable für die Vergabe von Zuschüssen, die Freiwilligenarbeit deiner Teammitglieder und CSR-Programme.

Submittable Software - 1
Submittable Software - 2
Submittable Software - 3
Submittable Software - 4
Submittable Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Submittable das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Submittable

Submittable

4,7 (163)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
154
7
4,6 (163)
4,5 (163)
4,6 (163)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
338,00 €
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
49
8
4,6 (11)
4,8 (11)
5,0 (11)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Submittable

Good Grants
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Compliance Management
Förderantrag-Management
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
SurveyMonkey
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Befragungs-/Umfragemanagement
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Umfragenerstellung
Formstack Forms
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aufgabenmanagement
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Umfragenerstellung
Wufoo
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Formularerstellung und -design
Umfragenerstellung
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Fälligkeits-Tracking
Förderantrag-Management
Verfolgen von Subventions-Gewährungen
Jotform
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Felder
Anpassbare Formulare
Formularerstellung und -design
Gmail
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Inbox-Management
Spam-Blockierung
Suchen / filtern
Little Green Light
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Spenden-Tracking
Spender-Management
für gemeinnützige Organisationen
OpenWater
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anpassbare Felder
Anpassbare Formulare
Wertung

Bewertungen über Submittable

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,7
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,6
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
75%
4
21%
3
3%
2
1%
Jeff
Jeff
Associate Editor in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

It provides me with all necessary services as a submitter. It provides all I require as an editor.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

Submittable is convenient. As a submitter, it provides efficient mechanisms for making submissions and efficient tracking of those submissions. As an editor, it provides me with notices and updates to allow me to process submissions quickly and efficiently. Submittable is practical. As a submitter, a single page allows me to keep track of active submissions to several publications. As an editor, the features for reaction and response to submitters makes my job much easier. Submittable is uncomplicated, easily used, and easy to understand. As a submitter, these qualities make submissions tracking manageable. Submittable is used widely enough to be familiar to virtually all writers and artists who submit work for publication.

Nachteile:

Our current package allows only 5 of our team members to have access to submissions. I could wish for more relaxed limits in that regard.

Hana
Director in USA
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great product with some kinks

4,0 vor 2 Wochen Neu

Kommentare: Overall a great application platform for our users. It is straightforward to create applications and review them on the back end. However we encountered an issue with receiving certain notifications for applicant messages and the tech support team was never able to resolve them which has proved very challenging to work around.

Vorteile:

The ease of use for students and the customizable review

Nachteile:

The tech support and the difficulty filtering applications that are in-progress but closed for editting.

Laura
Program Manager in USA
Philanthropie, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Room for Improvement

3,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Good for now. Has helped with communication with applicants but would want to maximize the cons to improve our nonprofit relationships and enhance internal efficiency

Vorteile:

Ease of creating applications/forms, ability to message with applicants directly in the portal, reviewer process is user friendly

Nachteile:

Lack of automation, limited placeholder tags to be able to integrate DocuSign or other 3rd party integrations that would help with automation, delayed reporting, kind of messy once you get a lot of applications/projects set up, no intentional nonprofit relationship management capabilities, limited project/award management features.

Derrick
Extension Program Specialist in USA
Grundschul- & Sekundarbildung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

The right tool for the jobs

5,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: From the product itself to the prompt customer service, everything about Submittable has been very positive. The system functions as advertised and it has enabled our youth development program to administer what has historically been in-person events and activities into a digital format. That has saved time and travel expenses for our employees and volunteers.

Vorteile:

I love the clean design, ease of use, and functionality. The projects and forms are easy to create, highly customizable, and user-friendly for clientele. The ease to which project assignments can be made and tracked is another great feature. We started using Submittable to help us manage a sizable photography contest, and have since been finding ways to migrate other activities/contests (like public speaking, leadership applications, and videography to name a few) into this platform.

Nachteile:

I would like to see some type of organizational structure within forms, projects, and the team to help keep different groups or activities separated. Currently, those lists are becoming quite long and clutter up the pages. A folder system would be ideal that might include activity groups as well as a means to archive forms and projects. Perhaps to help de-clutter, I would like for other teams admins to only see the projects, forms, and reports they created. Team member A doesn't need to see everything that team member B has created. Unless they are a level 5, they only need to see their own work.

Josh
Director of Assessment in USA
Hochschulbildung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Submittable - grant management with a lot to offer

5,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: The experience has been fantastic. The onboard was super helpful. They seem like they really care that we get the most of the product. They've even added new features in the short time that we've been using Submittable. If they don't have functionality, they will help in finding a work around or will work on that feature.

Vorteile:

It's very easy to use. The drag and drop features when creating forms are great. It saves tons of time. There are so many features! But it's not overwhelming. There is little training involved in form creation, so delegating is a snap.

Nachteile:

The features around managing internal users could be more robust. We are not able to customize what program managers can view - all grant programs can be seen by everyone, partitioning would be a nice feature. Additionally, if someone leaves a grant midstream, it is going to be difficult to get a replacement user as only one user can be the primary contact. This makes updating forms and team applications more difficult.