--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Submittable zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Submittable Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](/directory/20048/government/software) > [Submittable](/software/158382/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable?page=2) > Cloudbasierte Plattform für das Einreichungs-/Antragsmanagement zum Akzeptieren und Überprüfen digitaler Inhalte aller Art. Intuitiv und anpassbar. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 398 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Submittable? Unternehmen, Organisationen, Stiftungen, Non-Profit-Organisationen und Verbände jeder Größe, ortsunabhängig. Nutze Submittable für die Vergabe von Zuschüssen, die Freiwilligenarbeit deiner Teammitglieder und CSR-Programme. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 398 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Submittable - **Region**: Missoula, USA - **Gegründet**: 2010 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Angebotsmanagement - Anpassbare Formulare - Anwendungsmanagement - Auswirkungsmanagement - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Betrugserkennung - Bewerberportal - Bewerter verwalten - Biometrie - Compliance Management - Dokumentenmanagement - Drag-and-Drop - Eintrags-Management - Elektronische Unterschrift - Erinnerungen - Feedback-Management - Formularerstellung und -design - Formularverwaltung - Freiwilligen-Management - Fundraising-Management - Förderungssuche - Kampagnenmanagement - Kommunikationsmanagement - Kontaktmanagement - Mehrere Authentifizierungsmethoden - Mitarbeiteranerkennung - Mitglieder-Datenbank - Mitgliedschaft-Management - Mobiles Spenden - Online-Spenden - Recruiting von Freiwilligen - Self-Service Portal - Spenden-Tracking - Spender-Management - Subventions-Management - Umfragen & Feedback - Veranstaltungsmanagement - Verwalten von Beurteilungen - Verwaltung von Auszeichnungen - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Wertung - Wiederkehrende Spenden - Wirtschaftsprüfung-Management - Workflow Automation - Workflow-Management - Zahlungsabwicklung - Zielseiten / Web-Formulare - für Regierung ... und 33 weitere Funktionen ## Integrationen (21 insgesamt) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... und 6 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20048/government/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20048/government/software) - [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20047/fundraising/software) - [Spendenverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30548/donation-management/software) - [Software für die Identitätsprüfung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/33695/identity-verification/software) - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Good Grants](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/206672/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (96 reviews) 3. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (101 reviews) 4. [Little Green Light](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/123954/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (317 reviews) 5. [Sage Intacct](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/76/intacct) — 4.3/5 (716 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Nothing to dislike, and a great concept/platform" — 5.0/5 > **Grace Gabriella** | *30. Dezember 2025* | Medienproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I've used Submittable for over 5 years, entering various competitions and creating philosophical and healing poetry. Also, writing short stories (entered into competitions). > > **Nachteile**: Nothing, in all honesty... I found it very simple and easy to use. Sign up was effortless, and seemed secure. > > Positive, easy to use, not regular or over the top emails, and around one email a year I think, reminding me of my subscription. They also send emails approaching competition deadlines and results. So this is great. ----- ### "WizeHive is the right size solution" — 5.0/5 > **Adam** | *1. Oktober 2024* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We're just on the finishing end of launching our database, transitioning out from another database provider we've used for the past 7 years. While that provider required learning the liquid coding language or contracting with their team to make any changes, WizeHive offers incredible flexibility and ease of use. As the sole staffer of a foundation, I need the database to run smoothly and for changes to be made easily, so that management does not take up too much time. WizeHive's team has been excellent in helping us get off the ground and prepare the system for launch. Work with our previous provider was kind of a nightmare in comparison. Using the system seems like it will be pretty seamless from both an administrator and grantee perspective, but we will find out once it is put into use in a few weeks. We considered WizeHive when we made our previous selection 7 years ago, and the company has grown in a way that we believe will address all our needs in an elegant way. This seems like a solution that was able to be right-sized for our needs, without additional feature bloating that complicates some of the other options on the market. > > **Nachteile**: There are a few features that are still coming online that will be essential for us, including document and email merge field capability within the system. Our previous system was strong on graphic capability, we will see how Wizehive is in use in terms of being able to quickly view and access data in a clean way. > > From sales to support staff, it has been a pleasure to work with the WizeHive team to this point. Setup, while intensive, has been pretty painless. We have strong expectations for usage. ----- ### "Not worth the money" — 3.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. Juli 2019* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It does the basics that every other platform does. The application from the applicant side and review portals are easy to use. > > **Nachteile**: -There's no support provided via phone unless you email them first and schedule a meeting (which takes a few days for urgent matters). -Emails usually end up in spam folders. -You can't duplicate applications or move them to the next year's cycle which is frustrating if you've deferred an applicant. -The letter generator plugin is not the greatest. You can't insert certain information which means you will probably have to do write the letters manually. -Recreating all the forms for each year -Submitted and incomplete (unsubmitted) applications are all saved in one place. -The system does not automatically email applicants about the final decision. You will have to do this manually via your own email. -The survey form has very limited functions. -Applications that are submitted but do not have transcripts and letters of recommendations show up as completed on the back-end. You will have to go through every submitted application to make sure they have completed 100% of your requirements. This again takes a lot of time to go through if you have a lot of applicants. These are just some of the things the system is unable to do. > > Overall, this system is not user friendly. I find myself spending so much time going through their help center documents. When I don't find a solution to my problem, I have no choice but to contact customer service which is a headache. It takes them about 24 hours to reply to urgent matters and most of the time they provide a complicated solution which they assume we would know how to do. We pay thousands of dollars every year not to have 24/7 customer service or for WizeHive not to make better improvements to the system. The only major change that they have done this year was redesigning the login page. ----- ### "Everything we wanted and more\!" — 5.0/5 > **Tamia** | *30. Oktober 2024* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Having everything needed/wanted in one website; as well as, the quick response time when I had a questions or concern. > > **Nachteile**: I like everything about WizeHive and understand the process they use for their users. > > Great\! The customer service was awesome and the product itself is everything we wanted and more. ----- ### "My Zengine Experience with WizeHive" — 5.0/5 > **Jennifer** | *17. November 2023* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like everything about WizeHive, but hands down the cherry on top was our implementation lead, \[sensitive content hidden\]. Maybe all the leads are exactly the same -- I hope so, for the sake of everyone else -- but the success of our platform and launch is credited to the team leader. I cannot say enough good things about his intelligence to build, troubleshoot, test, reconfigure, and train me all while thinking of our needs, what we would need next, and what I didn't yet know. His technical talent is matched by his patience and priority of wanting our foundation and me to be set up for success from start to finish. I got that impression also in my calls with \[sensitive content hidden\]; instead of giving me bullet points of all things WizeHive, he asked questions about what we had, what we needed, what we wanted, and what we saw as our future needs. \[sensitive content hidden\] seems to be on that same wagon and I am thrilled to have the support system for this product. > > **Nachteile**: I can't really think of anything I would consider a con. I would have liked to know more going in, but our foundation's timeline did not allow -- we were coming up on our next scholarship cycle and there was no time to waste -- but having training modules is very helpful. I refer back to them and hope they keep coming. > > It has been wonderful. I've launched my share of platforms in my career and this was as well-planned, structured, and executed as any of the best I've experienced. ----- Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten