--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Submittable zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Submittable Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](/directory/20048/government/software) > [Submittable](/software/158382/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable?page=2) > Cloudbasierte Plattform für das Einreichungs-/Antragsmanagement zum Akzeptieren und Überprüfen digitaler Inhalte aller Art. Intuitiv und anpassbar. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 398 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Submittable? Unternehmen, Organisationen, Stiftungen, Non-Profit-Organisationen und Verbände jeder Größe, ortsunabhängig. Nutze Submittable für die Vergabe von Zuschüssen, die Freiwilligenarbeit deiner Teammitglieder und CSR-Programme. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 398 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Submittable - **Region**: Missoula, USA - **Gegründet**: 2010 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Angebotsmanagement - Anpassbare Formulare - Anwendungsmanagement - Auswirkungsmanagement - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Betrugserkennung - Bewerberportal - Bewerter verwalten - Biometrie - Datenüberprüfung - Dokumentenmanagement - Dokumentenprüfung - Drag-and-Drop - Eintrags-Management - Elektronische Unterschrift - Erinnerungen - Feedback-Management - Finanzmanagement - Formularerstellung und -design - Formularverwaltung - Fundraising-Management - Förderungssuche - ID Scannen - KYC Compliance - Kampagnenmanagement - Kommunikationsmanagement - Mehrere Authentifizierungsmethoden - Mitarbeiteranerkennung - Mitglieder-Datenbank - Mobiles Spenden - Nutzereinführung - Online-Spenden - Prozess-/Workflow-Automatisierung - Recruiting von Freiwilligen - Self-Service Portal - Spenden-Tracking - Spender-Management - Statusverfolgung - Subventions-Management - Umfragen & Feedback - Verwalten von Beurteilungen - Verwaltung von Auszeichnungen - Wertung - Wiederkehrende Spenden - Workflow-Management - Zahlungsabwicklung - Zeitverfolgung - Zielseiten / Web-Formulare - für Regierung ... und 33 weitere Funktionen ## Integrationen (21 insgesamt) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... und 6 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20048/government/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20048/government/software) - [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20047/fundraising/software) - [Spendenverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30548/donation-management/software) - [Software für die Identitätsprüfung](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/33695/identity-verification/software) - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Good Grants](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/206672/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Optimy](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/142236/optimy) — 4.6/5 (42 reviews) 3. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (94 reviews) 4. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (100 reviews) 5. [Little Green Light](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/123954/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Nothing to dislike, and a great concept/platform" — 5.0/5 > **Grace Gabriella** | *30. Dezember 2025* | Medienproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I've used Submittable for over 5 years, entering various competitions and creating philosophical and healing poetry. Also, writing short stories (entered into competitions). > > **Nachteile**: Nothing, in all honesty... I found it very simple and easy to use. Sign up was effortless, and seemed secure. > > Positive, easy to use, not regular or over the top emails, and around one email a year I think, reminding me of my subscription. They also send emails approaching competition deadlines and results. So this is great. ----- ### "Everything we wanted and more\!" — 5.0/5 > **Tamia** | *30. Oktober 2024* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Having everything needed/wanted in one website; as well as, the quick response time when I had a questions or concern. > > **Nachteile**: I like everything about WizeHive and understand the process they use for their users. > > Great\! The customer service was awesome and the product itself is everything we wanted and more. ----- ### "Not worth the money" — 3.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. Juli 2019* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It does the basics that every other platform does. The application from the applicant side and review portals are easy to use. > > **Nachteile**: -There's no support provided via phone unless you email them first and schedule a meeting (which takes a few days for urgent matters). -Emails usually end up in spam folders. -You can't duplicate applications or move them to the next year's cycle which is frustrating if you've deferred an applicant. -The letter generator plugin is not the greatest. You can't insert certain information which means you will probably have to do write the letters manually. -Recreating all the forms for each year -Submitted and incomplete (unsubmitted) applications are all saved in one place. -The system does not automatically email applicants about the final decision. You will have to do this manually via your own email. -The survey form has very limited functions. -Applications that are submitted but do not have transcripts and letters of recommendations show up as completed on the back-end. You will have to go through every submitted application to make sure they have completed 100% of your requirements. This again takes a lot of time to go through if you have a lot of applicants. These are just some of the things the system is unable to do. > > Overall, this system is not user friendly. I find myself spending so much time going through their help center documents. When I don't find a solution to my problem, I have no choice but to contact customer service which is a headache. It takes them about 24 hours to reply to urgent matters and most of the time they provide a complicated solution which they assume we would know how to do. We pay thousands of dollars every year not to have 24/7 customer service or for WizeHive not to make better improvements to the system. The only major change that they have done this year was redesigning the login page. ----- ### "Submittable makes things run smoothly" — 5.0/5 > **Amelia** | *4. Februar 2026* | Staatsverwaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's super easy to use for my team as a funder and for our grant applicants. It has streamlined the review process that helps keep our funding running smoothly throughout the year. > > **Nachteile**: I wish the advanced reporting were a little more user-friendly, but that is being updated regularly to support what we need as users. > > Great\! Submittable helps me do my job in a way I couldn't without it. From the implementation support to, to regular product updates, it just keeps getting easier to use. ----- ### "Positive Experience with WizeHive - Excellent training, support, and resources" — 5.0/5 > **Renee Sanders** | *17. Juni 2024* | Umweltdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: WizeHive has proven to be a wonderful solution for our program. We are currently running a large multi-year grant funding competition and needed a system that could meet our needs for proposal collection, application review, reporting, and other elements of grant management. WizeHive has been a perfect fit. The training experience with \[sensitive content hidden\] was excellent. \[sensitive content hidden\] always answered questions thoroughly and quickly solved problems as we worked together to create our first fully-functioning application portal. During our application acceptance period, no applicants reported having any issues with the WizeHive system. Everything worked so smoothly\! Reviewers have also had a smooth experience while reviewing applications. The support staff is also quick to response with helpful resources. > > **Nachteile**: It would be nice if we could have the capacity to allow multiple files to be uploaded in one question in an application where relevant. > > Working with WizeHive has been a quality experience that has made grant and program management much easier for our team. We are thrilled to be working together over the next few years on our current program and look forward to looking for other efforts we could incorporate WizeHive into in the future. Administrators, applicants, and reviewers all report positive experiences with using WizeHive. ----- Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten