Bitbucket

Bitbucket

von Atlassian

Wer verwendet Bitbucket?

Software-Entwickler und Produkt-Teams

Was ist Bitbucket?

Kodieren, verwalten, CI / CD, kollaborieren – Bitbucket ist die Git-Lösung für Profi-Teams

Bitbucket – Details

Atlassian

https://bitbucket.org/

Gegründet 2002

Bitbucket – Preisübersicht

Bitbucket ist verfügbar ab 2,00 $/Monat. Bitbucket bietet eine Gratisversion und eine kostenlose Testversion. Weitere Preisinformationen für Bitbucket findest du unten.

Startpreis

2,00 $/Monat

Kostenlose Version

Ja

Gratis Testen

Ja

Einsatz

Cloud, SaaS, Web

Installiert - Windows

Training

Webinare

Dokumentation

Kundenbetreuung

Online

Bitbucket Funktionen

Continuous-Integration-Tools
Build-Protokoll
Debuggen
Genehmigungs-Management
Konfigurationsmanagement
Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung
Kontinuierliche Lieferung
Qualitätssicherungs-Management
Test-Management
Veränderungsmanagement
Dashboard
Fehlerbehebungsberichte
Genehmigungs-Workflow
KPIs
Portfoliomanagement
Priorisierung
Release-Management
Richtlinien Managemen-
Zeitplanmanagement
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Code-Refactoring
Datenmodellierung
Debuggen
Einsatz-Management
Kompatibilitätstests
Mobile Entwicklung
No-Code
Quellkontrolle
Software-Entwicklung
Web-App-Entwicklung
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Zugriffskontrollen/Berechtigungen

Bitbucket – Nutzerbewertungen

Zeigt 5 von 846 Nutzerbewertungen

Gesamt
4.6/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4.4/5
Kundenservice
4.3/5
Funktionen
4.5/5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4.5/5
Carlos david M.
Sr. Software Engineer
Finanzdienstleistungen, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    2/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.12.2019

"Bitbucket - The Enterprise alternative to GitHub"

Kommentare: I have used Bitbucket in multiple scenarios. But mostly for Software Development with Scrum Board. Although I have used KANABN as well. I have experience both as project administrator and as regular user.

Vorteile: Bitbucket is private repository with lots of feature and multiple language support.
In my daily use, I mostly commit Java applications using the scrum board.
I have used the cloud version for almost three years. In my previous company and now at my current one.
One of the best features is the code review following the git flow workflow. You can select the source and target branch for the pull request and you can select default approvers as well as define your own one.

Nachteile: The project administration, especially the setup of the permissions for a particular repository tends to be quite hard. And when you try to contact support, usually there is no help at all and you end up researching on forums to be able to find the answer you're looking for.
In this kind of software, especially if a company like Attlassian is behind it, the support should be better.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.12.2019
Usman K.
Software Engineer
Computer-Software, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    3/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    3/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.1.2020

"Great tool, automation docs could be better"

Kommentare: Once you get the hang of Bitbucket, it is easy to use and a very good visualizing tool for what you are doing with your repositories.

Vorteile: Bitbucket has a good UI and is very good for most of the repository related tasks. It has JIRA integration, so if you put your JIRA ticket numbers in the commit message, Bitbucket will link the pull requests into JIRA. This makes it very easy to access commits and the associated JIRA tickets from bitbucket itself, and vice versa. It has good branch visualization tools. It lets you select branches from a drop down and compare them with other source barnches. The diff visualizer is pretty good too. It even has good graphical icons to show which branches have been merged/rebased where. You can use command line git to manage repos as well. With their REST APIs it is possible to create repositories from the command line, which is very useful in cases where you have to do the tedious task of creating hundreds of repositories very similar to one another.

Nachteile: I was unable to find documentation on their APIs to set group and permissions access restrictions from the command line. This was required because we needed to create 100s of repos and allow our users to access them. Because we could not find API documentation easily and were in a time crunch, we had to have developers spend several days manually granting permissions using the web-console. Bitbucket should have these APIs clearly visible and documented.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.1.2020
Verifizierter Rezensent
Senior C# Developer
Computer-Software, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 12.12.2019

"No 1 Version Control service"

Kommentare: I am using Bitbucket for various different projects for more than 4 years now and I am extremely happy with it.
As mentioned above it has an Issue tracker built-in on top of the version control and that really makes my life easier.
It even has numerous ways of notifying me when some activity happens in our repository so I like it even more.

Vorteile: It is easy to use and very intuitive.
It has an issue tracker and ton of other features
It is free for small teams

Nachteile: Although Bitbucket works together with Jira (that has an amazing set of features on its own), perhaps I would like to see the issue tracker little more advanced. Not enough freedom when choosing the status of an issue, and not a good dashboard for tracking, for example, a milestone, or a project stage in a timeline. Yet I believe these are features that better suit some other type of product like Jira (again).

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 12.12.2019
Adrian C.
Programmer
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    3/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    2/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    1/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    1/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    0/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 8.1.2020

"Started as a great product, but I got disappointed"

Kommentare: Brilliant from 7 years go until approx 3 years ago. Painful to use for the last 3 years and we are currently migrating everything to GitHub.

Vorteile: We started implementing version control using Mercurial about 7 years ago (in my own company). On the advice of a colleague at the time we used Mercurial as opposed to Git. Bitbucket worked perfectly with Mercurial when we needed it at the time and really helped our business. It was fast easy to use and understand and the online UI kept getting better and better.

Nachteile: In the last 3 years, pushing and pulling and doing any kind of actions became tediously slow. I copied some of the repos to GitHub and converted to Git to check it was not a problem with my repo, with my computer, or with the software I was using (SourceTree). In all cases the only difference was using a Mercurial versus Git repo on BitBucket. I got no response to my support query, and no response to a forum post as to the issue and when it would be fixed. I then made a decision for our entire company to move all of it's repos to GitHub and stop using BitBucket - we are doing this right now. Approx 1 year after the decision was made, BitBucket emailed all it's customers to say they would be discontinuing support for Mercurial as not enough of their customer base used it. However there was no suggestion of helping migrate all repos to Git, no support docs on how to do this and honestly this was too little too late for us. We had become so annoyed with BitBucket that we would have migrated regardless.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 8.1.2020
Luis daniel R.
Lead Application Developer
Computer-Software, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    4/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 24.12.2019

"A good free alternative to github"

Kommentare: I've been using it now for 6 years and it's my main repo host for work. I can recall only two times where there was a downtime that affected me, but besides that, there's never been a problem with them.

Vorteile: I like how robust their website is on terms of pull requests and integrations with JIRA and other atlassian products. You can store private repo's and manage it. The pull Request feature is the strongest in my opinion, with reviews and linking to JIRA. So it automatically can close tickets once you merge/accept a pull request. If you link the commits with a JIRA issue it also updates with them. They recently simplified the UI and their own home made SourceTree Visual App has received some substantial upgrades over the years and it's one of the best tree-based git history apps out there. In all honesty, it's a simple git control hosting website you can use online or host by yourself. It's really good.

Nachteile: The UI used to change a lot but now they've settled. Sometimes, compared to github, processing big pull requests (loading the changes/previewing) can be a little slow. Sometimes the integrations with JIRA, can feel like a miss if you don't use it, because Github has a lot of those features that Github might miss.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 24.12.2019