Wer nutzt diese Software?

Canto bietet die besten Digital-Asset-Management-Systeme für mittelgroße und große Unternehmen. Kunden können zwischen Cloud-basiertem, vor Ort installiertem oder hybridem Ansatz wählen.

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

310 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 4.5 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 4.5 / 5
  • Kundenservice 4.5 / 5
  • Funktionen 4.5 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4.5 / 5

Produktdetails

  • Preisinformationen Die On-Permise oder Cloud-Lizenz beginnt bei €30.000 pro Jahr
  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Kostenlose Testversion Nein
  • Einsatz Installiert - Mac
    Cloud, SaaS, Web
    Installiert - Windows
    Mobile - iOS Native
  • Training Persönlich
    Live Online
    Webinare
    Dokumentation
  • Kundenbetreuung 24/7 (Live Vertreter)
    Support während der Geschäftszeiten
    Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • Canto
  • https://www.canto.com/de
  • Gegründet 1990

Über Canto Digital Asset Management

Canto ist führend im Bereich Digital Asset Management. Unsere Software-Lösungen konzentrieren sich ausschließlich auf DAM, und wir sind der einzige DAM-Anbieter, der alle Deployment-Optionen bietet: SaaS, vor Ort installiert, private Cloud und Hybrid Cloud. Top-Marken haben seit mehr als 25 Jahren auf Canto vertraut, von großen Unternehmen bis hin zu Abteilungsteams. Organisationen wählen auch weiterhin Canto aufgrund unseres Engagements für moderne UX, leistungsstarke Suche, professionelle Dienstleistungen und vieles mehr. Erfahre, ob Canto das Richtige für deine DAM-Initiative ist.

Canto Digital Asset Management Funktionen

  • Anlagenbeteiligung
  • Berichterstattung / Analyse
  • Bibliothek von Vermögenswerten
  • Dateikonvertierung
  • Kategorisierung von Vermögenswerten
  • Kundenspezifisches Branding
  • Metadata-Management
  • Mobile App
  • Suchen / filtern
  • Versionskontrolle
  • Workflow-Management

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Canto Digital Asset Management

Robust features and multiple ways of access

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 27.9.2016
Laura K.
Business Process Leader
Konsumgüter, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
4 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: What do you like best?
The flexibility of deployment and implementation was paramount for our organization, as we ended up hosting the solution on premise due to our large file sizes. We love how the metadata is written back to the asset. Additionally, the various ways to access the assets through the web, through apps or through a desktop client made the user adoption go very smoothly.
What do you dislike?
Customizing the software during the installation and implementation phase was more time consuming than we had anticipated and with the new releases of software and portals we have encountered some delays and hiccups (we are working through them). Out of the "box" reporting is significantly lacking compared to the other options, but you can buy a 3rd party addin for that.
What business problems are you solving? What benefits have you realized?
The visibility on where are assets have gone and where they are going is greatly increased, in addition to increasing the visibility of knowing what assets we have while enabling a strong search functionality has decreased duplication of assets and increased productivity and efficiency.

Vorteile: The flexibility of deployment and implementation was paramount for our organization, as we ended up hosting the solution on premise due to our large file sizes. We love how the metadata is written back to the asset. Additionally, the various ways to access the assets through the web, through apps or through a desktop client made the user adoption go very smoothly.

Nachteile: Customizing the software during the installation and implementation phase was more time consuming than we had anticipated and with the new releases of software and portals we have encountered some delays and hiccups (we are working through them). Out of the "box" reporting is significantly lacking compared to the other options, but you can buy a 3rd party addin for that.

Robust features and multiple ways of access

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 27.9.2016
Laura K.
Business Process Leader
Konsumgüter, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
4 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: What do you like best?
The flexibility of deployment and implementation was paramount for our organization, as we ended up hosting the solution on premise due to our large file sizes. We love how the metadata is written back to the asset. Additionally, the various ways to access the assets through the web, through apps or through a desktop client made the user adoption go very smoothly.
What do you dislike?
Customizing the software during the installation and implementation phase was more time consuming than we had anticipated and with the new releases of software and portals we have encountered some delays and hiccups (we are working through them). Out of the "box" reporting is significantly lacking compared to the other options, but you can buy a 3rd party addin for that.
What business problems are you solving? What benefits have you realized?
The visibility on where are assets have gone and where they are going is greatly increased, in addition to increasing the visibility of knowing what assets we have while enabling a strong search functionality has decreased duplication of assets and increased productivity and efficiency.

Vorteile: The flexibility of deployment and implementation was paramount for our organization, as we ended up hosting the solution on premise due to our large file sizes. We love how the metadata is written back to the asset. Additionally, the various ways to access the assets through the web, through apps or through a desktop client made the user adoption go very smoothly.

Nachteile: Customizing the software during the installation and implementation phase was more time consuming than we had anticipated and with the new releases of software and portals we have encountered some delays and hiccups (we are working through them). Out of the "box" reporting is significantly lacking compared to the other options, but you can buy a 3rd party addin for that.

Lies weitere Bewertungen