--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über FlowPaper zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: FlowPaper Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Verlagssoftware](/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) > [FlowPaper](/software/155012/flowpaper) # FlowPaper Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/155012/flowpaper Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/155012/flowpaper?page=2) > Du kannst deine PDF-Dokumente auf eine freundliche und schöne Weise ins Web bringen und gleichzeitig die Zusammenarbeit verbessern. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 13 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet FlowPaper? Für Kreativwirtschaft, Webdesigner, Web-Publisher. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 13 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Devaldi ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 75,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10 - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 208 weitere ## Funktionen - Layout und Design ## Integrationen (2 insgesamt) - Adobe Connect - Canva ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Chat ## Category - [Verlagssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Verlagssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) - [Content-Marketing-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30796/content-marketing/software) - [Grafiksoftware & Bildbearbeitungsprogramme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31010/graphic-design/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2244 reviews) 2. [Zoho Social](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/159351/zoho-social) — 4.7/5 (3478 reviews) 3. [Paperturn](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/202523/paperturn) — 4.9/5 (141 reviews) 4. [Flipsnack](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/176854/flipsnack) — 4.6/5 (310 reviews) 5. [Sprout Social](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/121447/sprout-social) — 4.4/5 (609 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "We use Flowpaper to protect sensitive documents from being copied, while sharing with intended users" — 5.0/5 > **William** | *26. Juni 2018* | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is a flexible piece of software. It can be used as a publishing tool to share PDF documents with optional printing, downloading, and full search indexing. It can also be used in a more restrictive way since the viewer can be customized with only the tools you need. We use this as the secure viewer for an online document library. By customizing the viewer we restrict printing and download access and force the documents to be rendered using streaming files. This prevents the documents from arriving on end user hard drives in any usable format, but allows the documents to be viewed in the browser window with 100% fidelity. This is a custom scenario, but several years ago this was the only secure viewer we could find that didn't break the bank. > > **Nachteile**: There is a steep learning curve and a lot of post purchase programming and customization to make this work. Flowpaper provides some working examples to base your environment on, but it is still a lot of custom programming to integrate. > > Secure document viewing for end users. Protecting a very large online library for theft. Very favorable pricing for what this software accomplishes. ----- ### "Good Digital Publishing Platform" — 4.0/5 > **Scott** | *17. Juni 2026* | Konsumgüter | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The value for cost proposition is excellent in comparison to many other digital publishing competitors. > > **Nachteile**: There are frequent issues with trying to edit current publications. This includes text changes and revisions or trying to edit and republish with revisions. These edits or revisions result in unwanted changes to the publication that alter the desired look or state. > > Overall the experience has been good but would like to see the bugs and communication with FlowPaper editors be improved. ----- ### "Perfect tool to make Flipbooks from PDFs" — 5.0/5 > **Kapil** | *17. September 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I tried FlowPaper for a project almost 2 years ago, liked it in first go for ease of use. We made around 25 flipbooks. Last month when I got a project to make 13 more flipbooks for another project, my obvious choice was FlowPaper and I upgraded my plan to accommodate a second domain. > > **Nachteile**: Their current version is flagged by my Macbook Pro as Intel version, and I look forward to conversion to Mac silicon as an upgrade else I would lose a very good software. > > Simple, quick and easy. What else would one hope for\! Though it offers lot of customizations, the basic Zine thing itself works like a charm and was liked by both my clients in one go. ----- ### "FlowPaper Flipbook One Year Experience: Ease of Sharing Meets Limited Editing and Help" — 3.0/5 > **Donna** | *10. Juli 2026* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: 3.5 STARS: FlowPaper, in my opinion is an above average online conversion and publication tool that I use to share medical and genealogical research with professional colleagues and multigenerational family systems. I began using it about a year ago to turn static PDFs into magazine and book like “flipbook” experiences, an upgrade that improves readability, preserves visual fidelity, and makes complex reference material feel more approachable. After a year of use, FlowPaper satisfactorily meets one of my primary objectives: producing engaging, page-forward content that looks and navigates like a designed publication rather than a scanned document. > > **Nachteile**: I would, however, welcome additional features that feel intuitively interactive within the flipbook itself that is beyond outbound hotlinks that take readers away from the experience. The editing experience is also uneven. While FlowPaper does include an “edit” capability, in my workflow it does not deliver the same level of functional control as dedicated PDF editors such as Adobe Acrobat Pro. The closest thing to an effective editing workflow is the ability to replace a page (or pages), which works well as a practical “patch” mechanism when content changes without requiring a full rebuild. From a usability perspective, the documentation and onboarding are noticeably sparse. The instructions are brief, and the “how-to” guidance for using each feature, especially for creating richer page interactions or animations that is limited. Feature availability also appears to vary depending on whether you use a Zine or Plus Zine plan. In practice, outside of an organization with a dedicated budget, many of the more creative and capability-enhancing tools feel relatively basic. > > Will I continue using FlowPaper? Yes. It reliably converts large PDFs into a manageable, shareable link and delivers a workflow that is straightforward and low-friction. I also value the cloud-based approach: as long as my account remains active, I maintain continuity and control over my published content. If FlowPaper expanded its in-flipbook guidance, improved creative tools, and clarified the conversion outputs left on local storage, it would feel not only functional, but genuinely empowering, like a production-ready publishing platform, rather than a primarily conversion-oriented flipbook viewer. Finally, one recurring technical question is the presence of leftover files on my computer after conversion, more specifically files such as pdf\_40.jpg and pdf\_40.webp. I understand that image assets may be generated during conversion for rendering and optimization, but the role these files play (and why they persist on disk) is unclear to me. Clear, user-facing explanations would reduce friction that are both in terms of storage behavior and what, if anything, should be retained or cleaned up. ----- ### "Thumbs Up for FlowPaper" — 5.0/5 > **Adina** | *14. Juli 2026* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Pricing and ease of use. Plus: terrific customer support\! They are so quick to respond and so helpful. > > **Nachteile**: Accessing my file. Choosing folder never works. I use a work-around. But once I can grab the file, it's as easy as pie. > > We used to use a different vendor which we left for various reasons. I stumbled on FlowPaper when reviewing a publication on a different site and was really impressed. Would recommend it to any organization that needs such a product. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/155012/flowpaper?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/155012/flowpaper) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten