--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Make zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Make Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Integrationssoftware](/directory/8/integration/software) > [Make](/software/154278/integromat) # Make Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/154278/integromat Seite: 1 / 18\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/154278/integromat?page=2) > Tool für Workflowautomatisierung, um sich wiederholende Aufgaben zu beseitigen. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 407 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Make? Systemadministratoren, IT-Ingenieure, Geeks, gemeinsame Nutzer ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 407 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Make (formerly Integromat) - **Region**: Prague 8, Tschechien - **Gegründet**: 2012 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 10,59 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Tschechisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Indien, Japan, Kanada, Mexiko, Norwegen, Schweden, Tschechien, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - API - Aufgabenmanagement - Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen - Dashboard - Datenmanagement - Dokumentenmanagement - Formularverwaltung - Grafischer Workflow Bearbeiter - Mehrfache Datenquellen - Rollen-basierte Genehmigung - Suchen / filtern - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Konfiguration - Workflow-Management - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (128 insgesamt) - AWeber - ActiveCampaign - ActiveTrail - Adobe Commerce - Airtable - Asana - Autotask PSA - Basecamp - Bird - Bitbucket - Box - Brevo - Buffer - CAFLOU - Calendly ... und 113 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Integrationssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/8/integration/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Integrationssoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/8/integration/software) - [iPaaS Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32296/ipaas/software) - [Workflow Management Systeme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) - [API Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31065/api-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Zapier](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/130182/zapier) — 4.7/5 (3049 reviews) 2. [Albato](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1011434/albato) — 4.8/5 (405 reviews) 3. [APPSeCONNECT](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/106290/appseconnect) — 4.7/5 (180 reviews) 4. [ZappySys SSIS PowerPack](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/170286/ssis-powerpack) — 4.8/5 (107 reviews) 5. [Rayven](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/173908/rayven-industrial-business-intelligence) — 5.0/5 (24 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Super powerful automation tool" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *9. Juni 2025* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like how Make lets me automate my cold email campaigns with custom logic and integrations that would take hours manually. The integration with OpenAI in particular is awesome. > > **Nachteile**: The visual builder can get confusing with complex scenarios, and error handling isn’t always intuitive. Also, auto save should be implemented because I've lost changes many times with this. > > Overall has been a game changer in terms of scaling and automating repetitive tasks, especially with the automatic scheduling feature. ----- ### "MAKE - AI Automation for everyone" — 5.0/5 > **Marvin** | *3. Juli 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Make has an easy to understand, user firendly UI, with Drag and Drop you can add, connect and edit Moduls from a VERY wide range of tools to automate mail summaries, adding informations to exsiting data and so on, I could write an essay about the possibilities alone. But thanks to Drafts that are made by MAKE you can a good overview about the possibilities with MAKE. There is also a new option fpr AI Agents, Human in the Loop as an extra security step... MAKE is always up to date > > **Nachteile**: Due to the amount of possibilities with make it is sometimes hard to find the correct modules, connections or ideas. It is sometimes trial and error how to create your workflow. > > The experience with MAKE is great. Thanks to new features on a regular basis, a big community and a lot of help every project and workflow can be achieved, Of course you need to have time to understand the product, create and administrate your workflows, but that should be clear from the start. MAKE is for automation, but it needs know-how to use, which you can get by using the product. ----- ### "Best automation tool on the market" — 5.0/5 > **Leo** | *8. November 2024* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Super easy to learn and very intuitive to use, even for non-engineering folks. Enables a very wide range of automation use cases. Has pre-built integrations with almost every widely used SaaS tool. > > **Nachteile**: Operations based pricing can have some drawbacks when users aren't onboarded properly > > Overall, it's a great tool enabling all kinds of business functions to start automating their own processes, requiring fewer people to build processes. Even within product teams, Make can be super useful for building and exploring new processes or solutions, refining all the features until satisfaction before putting it into regular code. Even though it's very easy to use for business users, we found that it makes sense to onboard heavy-users on some engineering best-practices. Microservice-like scenario architectures can be quite helpful for managing bigger processes and ensuring maintainability. ----- ### "Connects Apps" — 4.0/5 > **Nuria** | *18. Mai 2025* | Telekommunikation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Super useful to build complex automations without needing to code, I link multiple apps together and it works like a flowchart so it’s easy to follow > > **Nachteile**: Only thing is, when one step fails it sometimes stops the whole scenario, and debugging takes a bit too long. Also hit the operation limit faster than I thought ----- ### "Get Started with no code automation using Make. Best for beginners." — 5.0/5 > **Chirag** | *3. Mai 2026* | Verbraucherdienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I have been using Make.com platform for about 1.5 years. And the experience so far has been great. I work as an AI Automation engineer, and infect my internship experience has been real game changing for me in this field of AI Automation, and a great thanks to this platform. Super easy to build workflows for almost any use cases, replacing manual work process in the businesses with ai automated workflows using make.com. Easy to build and get hang of it. The most important benefit i felt was explaining the workflow to the non technical person as well. The simple UI/UX of make, is helpful for non technical person to understand and create workflows without any issues and hassle. So for someone who comes from non technical background to start with ai automations, the make platform is best to start with. Even though i come from technical background i have seen many non technical people around me use this platform fluently. If i had to code the same automation it would have taken me atleast 3-4 weeks of time along with the hosting part as well, but make.com hardly takes 1 week, no need to worry about hosting as well. And also the huge library Make has, never have run out of options for integrations in make. have always found ready integrations in the make's library of tools and integrations. Also recently one of the best additions was the using of make credits for AI and other platforms instead of using api tokens, i could rather depend on make credits. > > **Nachteile**: I am not fond of white screen when i am working for hours on laptop. And that is the missing thing in make.com despite seeing lot of requests for adding a dark view or night mode for the platform Make has yet to bring that feature. Apart from that, there sometimes are issues faced with integrations with meta related products. Like social media automations breaking sometimes, due to some issue in connection with Meta. > > Its been great experience so far with Make for me. as i said its been almost 1.5 years of building multiple automations, for businesses, individuals, companies or even for personal use cases, it has been an awesome journey. The support team of make.com is also very helpful and so is the documentations of make. so for me i have really enjoyed using this platform compared to any other no code automation tools ----- Seite: 1 / 18\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/154278/integromat?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/154278/integromat) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten