--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Codemagic zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Codemagic Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Automated Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Codemagic](/software/152573/nevercode) # Codemagic Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/152573/nevercode Seite: 1 / 6\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/152573/nevercode?page=2) > Fortlaufende Integration und Bereitstellung für Android-, iOS-, Cordova-, Ionic-, React-Native- und Flutter-Projekte. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 125 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Codemagic? Unternehmen wie Toyota, Hootsuite, Schneider Electric und InvoiceNinja nutzen die Software, um Ingenieurteams Zeit zu sparen und die Markteinführungszeit zu verkürzen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 125 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Nevercode - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 0,04 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000 - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Andorra, Argentinien, Armenien, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Belarus, Belgien, Bhutan, Bolivien, Bosnien und Herzegowina, Brasilien, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgarien, Chile, China, Deutschland und 102 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Automated Testing - Debuggen - Grafische Benutzeroberfläche - Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung - Kollaboration mehrerer Nutzer - Kompatibilitätstests - Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung - Kontinuierliche Lieferung - Pipeline-Management - Versionskontrolle - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Management ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Continuous-Integration-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 2. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.6/5 (949 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3017 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15495 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1262 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Give your review a title Excellent Flutter CI/CD platform for iOS and Android" — 5.0/5 > **Khaled** | *23. August 2026* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Codemagic makes building Flutter apps for both iOS and Android incredibly simple. The interface is clean, the workflow editor is easy to understand, and setting up code signing and building IPA and AAB files is much faster than doing everything manually. I especially like being able to build both platforms from one place using a Mac build machine. > > **Nachteile**: Some of the advanced settings can be a little confusing the first time, especially options such as Shorebird, code signing, and distribution. A few more beginner-friendly explanations directly inside the workflow editor would make the setup even easier. > > My overall experience has been excellent. I was able to connect my private GitHub repository, configure my Flutter project, set up Android and iOS signing, and start a release build very quickly. The platform saves a huge amount of time compared with managing separate build environments manually. The UI is also very polished and makes the whole process feel professional. Definitely one of the best tools I have used for Flutter CI/CD. ----- ### "Overall Good CI/CD for Flutter" — 5.0/5 > **Ivo** | *1. Juli 2021* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Good integration with Bitbucket, easy to use UI to set up CI jobs. Mac machines with everything preinstalled to do Flutter testing, build and releases. Allows auto-cancelling of previous builds if new commits are pushed. Especially App Store Connect helpers were very welcome since we didn't have much experience with publishing iOS apps. Newer Yaml configuration option also works well and can of course be versioned with the rest of the app. > > **Nachteile**: Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update). That can lead to the wrong builds being auto-cancelled and a bit of confusion as to whats happening. Sometime issues with retrieving build logs. Dark mode could use more contrast. Linux machines still lack cache support. All in all only minor issues though. > > We needed a CI to build and publish a Flutter app for Android and iOS to both stores as well as Firebase App Distribution. Bitbucket Pipelines doesn't offer Mac machines so we chose something Flutter-specific to not have to worry about Flutter setup in CI. The good pre-configuration of the build machines as well as publishing tools saved us a lot of time in setting up the CI. ----- ### "Unity CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Enes** | *1. Juni 2022* | Computerspiele | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We were having a hard time building our games on Jenkins and codemagic came to the rescue. We can take concurrent builds at the same time for iOS, since it's a SaaS we don't have to manage the platform. It's very easy to use and set up. Pretty cheap when you compare it with the other platforms. > > **Nachteile**: You can store your codemagic.yaml file on the website so you always have to have it on your repository. > > We have faster build times. It is more secure than Jenkins. Very easy to setup for developers and other team members. ----- ### "Mobile app hardware limitation" — 3.0/5 > **Mahendra** | *3. Juli 2021* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The service of auto code signing and build triggers upon the commits with conditional triggers > > **Nachteile**: IOs code signing and slack support. the codemagic have very poor documentation for code signing they should given more example and help in code signing process . like i use gaming laptop i dont have ios and now i need ios app ipa file not to upload on appstore but for me to check max size before deliver. i should not need developer account for this . i can do it with xcode and so i can do it with mac cli rather then doing changes every time i can automate it but no help for that while there is appcircle ci/cd which provide their code. > > i Had made atleast 250+ build request and no doubt for time management this is unbeatable you do not need to wait in queue for long even you have free tier . Codemagic gives default installations of jq like tools which help us to save time in installing it every time plus cache service for add more option in default tools. ----- ### "Magic bullet for mobile CI/CD" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Juli 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The UI configuration wizard is one of the coolest thing of the whole system. Also, 1st class Flutter projects support is something I was looking for. > > **Nachteile**: There is no way to easily do a feature request or contact support, since Codemagic pushes users to their Slack community instead of giving a chance to just contact the right person. Also, after using Bitrise for quite some time it feels like Codemagic misses some additional predefined steps for configuration. ----- Seite: 1 / 6\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/152573/nevercode?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/152573/nevercode) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten