Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Ansible Tower?

Apps verwenden. Systeme verwalten. Komplexität vernichten. Ansible hilft dir, eine starke Grundlage für DevOps zu schaffen.

Wer verwendet Ansible Tower?

Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt

Ansible Tower Software - 1

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Ansible Tower das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Ansible Tower

Ansible Tower

4,5 (46)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
13
18
4,2 (46)
4,3 (46)
4,3 (46)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
7,75 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
160
20
4,0 (14.005)
4,3 (14.005)
4,2 (14.005)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Ansible Tower

Jira
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Agile Methodiken
Aufgabenmanagement
Projektplanung/Terminierung
Odoo
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Chancenmanagement
Fondsrechnung
Kontrolle des Genehmigungsprozesses
Azure DevOps Services
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Continuous Integration
Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Jenkins
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung
Kontinuierliche Lieferung
Pipeline-Management
Chef Enterprise Automation Stack
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Compliance Management
Server-Überwachung
Puppet Enterprise
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Konfigurationsmanagement
Server-Überwachung
BuildFire
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Grafische Benutzeroberfläche
No-Code
Prototyp-Erstellung
WaveMaker
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Comidor
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen
Workflow-Management
Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen

Bewertungen über Ansible Tower

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,3
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,3

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
57%
4
39%
3
4%
Abhinav
Abhinav
Sr Software Integrator in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

A premium solution for managing the configuration

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Ansible Tower enhancing our software development process as it is the part of DevOps methodology. The Dashboard provide the detail view of our complete environment which help in to scrutinize the errors. User can also customize the notifications as per need with integration with slack and emails. Ansbile Tower can be scale-able at any time. In portal mode we can simplify the dashboard view.

Vorteile:

Red Hat Ansible Tower is the best configuration tool in the market with the largest number of community. It helps in to boost up the software development cycle with DevOps methodology. Playbook can be running in universal yaml language. Ansbile provides the power to manage the remote servers. Job can be configured for schedule run on specific numbers of times. Role-Based access simplify the user management and help in to administrate the inventory. The Enterprise edition support is best option when we are implementing it to new project as 8x5 support always ready for help in your working hours.

Nachteile:

Ansible Tower should work on customization of user view dashboard, unnecessary notification as on by default and you have to disable it. Audit Trail feature should be also more organized and as it holds the sensitive data also.

Marcin
Marcin
Senior DevOps Engineer in Polen
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

RedHat supported automation center tool

4,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: For small projects or without a tight RedHat stack integration the free AWX might be better, but for bigger ones, with more complexity, when you are required to contractually guarantee support in all cases you want a tried and tested platform components with manufacturer support and that is where Tower comes in. A key tool to manage your nodes and their tool stack and deployments.

Vorteile:

Ease of use and great integration with the rest of RedHat stack upon which a lot of open source products and offerings are using.

Nachteile:

Price of enterprise support for the features it offers over open-source AWX.

María Laura
María Laura
IT Project Manager in Mexiko
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Stable IaaS platform with a STEEP learning curve.

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: System configuration automation is now done in a jiff.

Vorteile:

It does not need client-side processes or configuration (just ssh access). Command line interface is fast and comprehensive. Support is fast and everywhere.

Nachteile:

The learning curve is steep (I mean it). Reports are not as powerful or customizable as other tools in the market. SSH, while easy to use, lacks security.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Finanzdienstleistungen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great for Automation, Configuration Management, and Auditing/Reporting

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We are trying to manage our NetApp Storage cluster configurations for both automated provisioning and security audit configuration management. We're still POC'ing the software but so far it's simple and easy to setup. Once we do more complicated playbooks it'll be interesting to see how it turns out.

Vorteile:

Really like the Automation over other competing products like Puppet (you really need to know how to code in Ruby.) Love the concepts of Playbooks and Plays and the NetApp-specific (https://netapp.io) modules for ONTAP. Really simple to use! The configuration management and Auditing/Reporting are also really good.

Nachteile:

The ONTAP 9.5 to 9.6 has some REST API differences. Also you really need the Tower to do full audit configuration reporting and auditing. The free versions or non-Ansible versions don't have sufficient reporting functionality which is really important. Especially the configuration conformance reports.

Gurleen
Gurleen
Software Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ansible - The configuration management tool with the large community.

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: It’s helping us in deploying the hundreds of server with no time and no human error as it make it fully automatic after the configuration. Best feature is surely it’s dashboard by which we get the notification once the things are not according to our plan. With the help of Red Hat Ansible Tower we are jumping to pure DevOps environment.

Vorteile:

The Red hat Ansible Tower is a complete one stop tool that can manage your code. Best thing in it provide the large number of template to choice of Configuration management deployment. Scalability of hundreds nodes is also easy. It have master that run on the server. The secure ssh is used to remotely login to client systems. As clients machine does not need any specific setup on the system which make it easy and simple to manage. The uses push configuration technology in which we need can push the setting to the specific system on which we need that setting. For configuration script writing we can use yaml. As it’s easy to learn,setup & manage so it’s every organisation first choice as configuration management tool,which help in devOps practice.

Nachteile:

As the Ansible Tower is now Red Hat Ansible Tower. It’s growing fast and learning curves are more sharp with each updates, I always looking for the new fix and addition features added in updates as I have to check my compatibility of each time the company jumping to the new version. It's sure for Linux users but not very needy for windows users.