Wer verwendet Kalo?

Kalo eignet sich für große Unternehmen, die über Tabellenkalkulationen hinausgehen, um ihr freiberufliches Personal zu organisieren.

Was ist Kalo?

Kalo ist ein Freiberuflermanagementsystem, das für Unternehmen entwickelt wurde, die die Art und Weise, wie sie mit Freiberuflern arbeiten, optimieren möchten. Kalo bietet ganzen Organisationen und einzelnen Teams eine einfache Plattform für Einstellung, Arbeitszuweisung, Rechnungsnachverfolgung die Bezahlung von Freiberuflern.

Kalo – Details

Kalo

https://www.kalohq.com

Gegründet 2014

-thumb
-thumb
-thumb

Kalo – Preisübersicht

Kalo bietet keine Gratisversion, aber eine kostenlose Testversion.


Kostenlose Version

Nein

Gratis Testen

Ja

Kalo – Bereitstellung und Support

Kundenbetreuung

  • Support während der Geschäftszeiten
  • Online

Einsatz

  • Cloud, SaaS, Web

Training

  • Persönlich
  • Live Online
  • Webinare
  • Dokumentation

Kalo Funktionen

  • Auftragnehmer-Datenbank
  • Berichterstattung / Analyse
  • Budgetierung
  • Compliance Management
  • Dokumentenmanagement
  • Gebot-Management
  • Job-Management
  • Qualifikations-Tracking
  • Sicherheitsmanagement
  • Subunternehmen-Management
  • Terminplanung
  • Zeitverfolgung

Siehe die vollständige Fremdfirmenmanagement Software Liste

  • Auftragnehmer-Management
  • Bedarfsplanung
  • Budgetierung/Prognosen
  • Fähigkeiten-Nachverfolgung
  • Lebenszyklus-Management für Mitarbeiter
  • Leistungskennzahlen
  • Mitarbeitereinsatzplanung
  • Personalbeschaffungs-Management
  • Variable Mitarbeiter
  • Zeit- und Anwesenheitsmanagement

Siehe die vollständige Personaleinsatzplanung Software Liste

  • Audit Trail
  • Beschaffungsmanagement
  • Compliance Management
  • Leistungskennzahlen
  • Lieferantenzahlung
  • Offboarding
  • Self-Service Portal
  • Transaktionshistorie

Siehe die vollständige Vendor Management Systeme Liste

Kalo Alternativen

Mehr Alternativen zu Kalo

Kalo – Erfahrungen

Alle Bewertungen lesen

Gesamtbewertung

4,5/5

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit 4,3
Kundenservice 4,6
Funktionen 4,1
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4,3

Software bewerten

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwarekäufern.

Eine Bewertung schreiben
Monchette G.
Growth Manager - Lifecycle
Finanzdienstleistungen, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018

"Saves me hours of work each week"

Kommentare: I appreciate that a lot of my administrative work has been streamlined and centralized, so I no longer have to worry about a missed email or a missing article. Really great tool for managing my editorial team.

Vorteile: I manage a team of freelance writers for my organization, and Kalo makes it incredibly easy to issue assignments, track progress, create invoices, and make payments.

Nachteile: I wish there was a workflow specific to the editorial pitching process. I have a workaround that is still better than my old system, but having a way for writers to submit pitches and assign a task when a pitch is accepted would be clutch.

  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018
Bobby N.
Creative Manager
Internet, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 31.5.2018

"Kalo is an incredibly powerful product, I couldn't manage our creative team without it."

Kommentare: Freelancers all in one place, allowed us to escape spreadsheets! Onboarding time of freelancers was reduced from weeks to literally now the same day. Perhaps the biggest benefit was just having a searchable index of freelancers that we could sort by location, skill and day rate.

Vorteile: User experience. It's easy to use, importing freelancers took minutes, and our freelancers themselves raved about the experience once they were invited to the platform. I think most importantly it actually works. We tried a number of other platforms that looked similar to Kalo but their search function didn't work, sign up was unreliable and the integrations that competitors promised didn't actually exist so we lost 6 months on a project before we found Kalo. We found Kalo to be the only freelancer managment system on the market that actually has integrations with our existing systems, probably due to the fact they have been around for longer and their platform is more fully featured. For us having everything freelancer in one place and the fact it integrates with Docusign, Slack and our existing Payroll system was imperative. Although not software, having a customer support team for our teams on the West Coast and in the UK is great. It was really important that our team members could talk to someone real on the same timezone.

Nachteile: Their tax form collection module is new and so a little buggy but once we complained about it, it was fixed in minutes.

  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 31.5.2018
Tiffany B.
Director Of Operations
Onlinemedien, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Gesamtbewertung
    3 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    2 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    1 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    1 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    0/10
  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Quelle: GetApp
  • Bewertet am 29.1.2020

"Buyer beware"

Kommentare: The first year or so with Kalo went fairly well. Our 1099 data wasn't perfect the first time around (which I blamed on switching payers mid-year), and payments went off without too many hitches. But we continually ran into small issues - a payment wasn't issued when it said it was, payments were applied to newer invoices (vs. older ones in the queue, the data was often messy (despite attempts to standardize), etc. We were willing deal with these issues as the pricing was strong and we didn't feel like there was a reasonable competitor. But then they forced an entirely new pricing structure on us with a week's notice, so we were forced to sign-up for a plan that cost 3-4x as much. We ended up switching to another competitor for better reporting and access to our data, and once we gave our notice, they pretty much cut off all support and service. It was a really disappointing farewell and they refused to provide reasonable reports to off-board our freelancers and payment data.

Vorteile: Visually appealing; fairly user friendly

Nachteile: Lack of reporting - especially for payments
Rigidity of payments - couldn't process one-off payments or as desired
Access to data - if you wanted a report pulled, you had to pay for a "custom" report - even if it was a simple freelancer data
Unreliability of data - before AB5 went into effect, we tried to report on CA freelancers - it was more accurate to review each freelancer manually than rely on the report provided; even the search feature wasn't reliable - freelancers who clearly had CA addresses wouldn't show up the search

  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Quelle: GetApp
  • Bewertet am 29.1.2020
Verifizierter Rezensent
Production Manager, The Brandshop
Medienproduktion, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018

"Kalo Review"

Kommentare: I think it's improved a lot since the app first came out. Besides the glitches that still occur, it seems to be pretty efficient at least for the company side. However, I think it'd be helpful to somehow be more transparent with onboarding for the freelancers--as that's when the most questions come in (if they set up their account right, where the banking info is located, etc.)

Vorteile: I like how easy it is to search on the platform, and the design of the interface is approachable.

Nachteile: • I think the older interface was a little more straightforward for users but I can definitely understand amping up the overall look (i.e. when you hover over the icons on the left side, the name of the section should populate--vs. having to click first to figure out which section you're navigating).
• The app is often times glitchy (when a freelancer accepts a task, a lot of times it's accidentally marked as 'done' so this should be tweaked, etc.)
• Alerts - Would LOVE if it was possible to alert when profiles have been completed. Freelancers aren't always good at passing on that information. And to that point, if freelancers could be alerted if they haven't filled their profile out properly. Would avoid so much back and fourth.

  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018
Brendan M.
SENIOR EDITOR (current)
Schreiben & Editieren, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    7/10
  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018

"Steadily improving"

Kommentare: Kalo's a much more navigable option than other freelancer management systems I've used but it can lack some basic functionality to the point where it feels more like a beta test, even after some time using it. When it first arrived at our company it was a welcome change, but management of irrelevant info was often an unnecessary labor (e.g. no way to turn off or clear all on messages that didn't pertain to a user's actual role). Other aspects required some deeper searching when they should have been manifest, and filtration wasn't always smooth. This last remains a bit of a sticky wicket, as trying to find a freelancer often returns a limited number of applicable candidates or brings up irrelevant ones. All that said, they have been steadily addressing and improving these features, to the point where it now feels like the software it was always supposed to be. I look forward to continued usage.

Vorteile: Design, both graphic and UX. Not overwhelmed with more functions than typically required, but many are there for when you need. Loadtime is great. Very well thought-out flow from freelancer sourcing to project creation to task creation to completion.

Nachteile: Information management can sometimes require extra work, and you might not always get everything you're looking for / have to do some creative searching to find it. Other times you get stuff you'll never need with no way to turn it off.

  • Herkunft der Bewertung 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018