Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Was ist Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?
RFPIOs cloudbasierte Software hilft bei der Optimierung des Angebotsmanagements im Antwortprozess von RFP. Die Lösung automatisiert Import- und Exportfunktionen, zentralisiert Inhalte und erleichtert die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Beteiligten.
Eine dynamische Antwortbibliothek bietet zentralisierte Inhalte und einen Collaboration Hub und wird durch eine intelligente Empfehlungsmaschine erweitert.
Dank der Technologieintegration können Teams sich sofort mit Personen und Inhalten verbinden. Berichte und Dashboards geben einen klaren Einblick in den RFP-Fortschritt.
Wer verwendet Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?
RFPIO bietet Unternehmen aller Größen und Branchen, die auf RFPs reagieren, einen ROI. Erziele sofortigen ROI durch ein No-Nonsense-Setup, eine einfache und intuitive Nutzeroberfläche und robuste Integrationen.
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Responsive (formerly RFPIO) das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Weitere gute Alternativen zu Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Bewertungen über Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Affordable, comprehensive platform with superior admin / user support
Kommentare: Hundreds of hours saved in responding to questionnaires and RFPs. RFPIO offers very competitive cost savings over most of the larger RFP software providers. The same functionality at a fraction of the cost of the big guys. Customer support is top notch - all questions or requests for help are addressed within the same day (or within 24 hours at most). Great, direct support from the management team - no call centers, no outsourced product support. You get assistance from people who helped build the product.
Vorteile:
RFPIO's answer library is a miracle with great features. The library provides a way to assign different owners and keep individual Q&A pairs updated in real. Access to our stock answers saves our users and SMEs hundreds of hours each quarter and affords them more time to devote to their primary job functions while spending less time on researching technical responses.
Nachteile:
RFPIO is great for small to moderate sized teams. For larger organizations who complete 20 or more RFPs per month with multiple RFP teams working at the same time, multiple, parallel instances of RFPIO may be needed to best suit those needs on a grand scale.
Antwort von Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
vor 6 Jahren
Thank you, Brian! Hundreds of hours saved...time we're sure well spent! We appreciate your kind words, especially about our support team. We try to have our experts be accessible whenever possible. Thanks again for the high marks and thoughtful review!
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
I couldn't do my job without Responsive/RFPIO.
Kommentare: Wonderful. It doesn't get any better than Responsive.
Vorteile:
Responsive is the best tool I've used so far and I've tried a couple. It's intuitive, clean, and they are always adding features that are easy to learn and enhance user experience vs. takeaway. I have also enjoyed their new certification program. It has really helped me to utilize the tool better for myself and company.
Nachteile:
Price, but the sales team is a pleasure to work with and have been very helpful in meeting us where we are.
Transformative experience
Kommentare: The overall experience with RFPIO was transformative. It helped our business to move from the old system of QA's where an employee would keep asking the same question over and over again on a chat across different RFPs. RFPIO's knowledge base and vault of ready responses streamlined the process and allowed greater efficiency.
Vorteile:
What I liked the most about Responsive is that it enables collaboration between various teams without the need to rely on external software. Its integration with Slack also enabled me to stay on top on any meaningful changes to RFPs I'm involved in.
Nachteile:
The most problematic aspect of the software is its notification scheme. I often get Daily Task Reports for sections that are 100% complete and require no work from me as a contributor. My understanding is this cannot be limited by any setting.
Not that useful
Kommentare: Not good. Very frustrating using this product. I wish we used another tool.
Vorteile:
The progress tracking is nice and the ability to tag people for help on questions is useful.
Nachteile:
The search is terrible. It constantly misidentifies what I'm searching for and shows completely unrelated results. Searching for answers is our main use case for this tool and it fails pretty miserably. I waste a lot of time in Responsive looking for things that should be straightforward. Its always a crapshoot importing documents, a lot of time it messes up identifying the right questions and answers and i've lost track of how many times the answers get exported to the wrong cell.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
RFP Writer
Kommentare: While my current employer is still rolling it out, I have used Responsive before, and I am excited for the increased capacity it will allow us to have given our lean-team approach.
Vorteile:
Mainly the project management capabilities of the product. The first step of vetting an RFP always takes time, but with Responsive your hard work is rewarded with automation after you get the ball rolling.
Nachteile:
Building the database wasn't as intuitive as I would have liked, though the custom fields being able to be facets alongside tags is a great feature for those who are used to a traditional folder structure.
