--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Responsive zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Angebotsmanagement Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > RFP-Software, die den Antwortprozess durch Zusammenarbeit, zentrale Inhalte und Berichterstattung verbessert. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 190 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Responsive? RFPIO bietet Unternehmen aller Größen und Branchen, die auf RFPs reagieren, einen ROI. Erziele sofortigen ROI durch ein No-Nonsense-Setup, eine einfache und intuitive Nutzeroberfläche und robuste Integrationen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 190 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Region**: Beaverton, USA - **Gegründet**: 2015 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Chinesisch (traditionell), Deutsch, Dänisch, Englisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Koreanisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch, Schwedisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Israel, Kanada, Katar, Kuwait, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Saudi-Arabien, Schweden, Singapur, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und 3 weitere ## Funktionen - Angebotserstellung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automatische Formatierung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Content-Management - Daten-Import / -Export - Dokumentenmanagement - Fortschrittsverfolgung - Fälligkeits-Tracking - Inhalt-Bibliothek - Lieferanten-Management - Meilensteinverfolgung - Projektplanung/Terminierung - RFP-Management - Suchen / filtern - Third-Party Integrations - Versionskontrolle - Volltextsuche - Vorlagen - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Wissensbasis-Management - Wissensbibliothek - Workflow-Management - Zeit & Kosten Verfolgung - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (26 insgesamt) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... und 11 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Angebotsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Angebotsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Ausschreibungsprogramme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [BPM-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) - [Wissensmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30094/knowledge-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (46 reviews) 2. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 3. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1246 reviews) 4. [VT Docs](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/117155/visiblethread-docs) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) 5. [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/133042/loopio) — 4.6/5 (74 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Many options for content organization" — 4.0/5 > **Amber** | *7. Januar 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: There are many options for organizing the Content Library, from tags, to collections, to multiple responses to a question, and more. The project management feature is also useful, especially the option to invite guests to collaborate and not require them to make an account. > > **Nachteile**: There are many minor glitches, which after contacting the support team, usually get fixed in a timely manner, but after a while I don't want to report every little thing and wished that the QA team would catch them before going into production. Also the customer care team is hit and miss, and we faced some communication issues when it came to billing. > > I use this every day as part of my job and I am overall satisfied with the use of the tool and its many features. I am currently sorting out our thousands of pieces of content and I find the process enjoyable. ----- ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27. März 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Nachteile**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "Best Solution in the Industry to Me" — 5.0/5 > **Susan** | *16. April 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The speed in which I can import projects. The export to original upload format. The AI, the AI\!\!\!\!\! The wonderful responsive, accurate, helpful support team. The incredible staff, webinars, coffee chats, and community > > **Nachteile**: When I find the hidden incapabiilties, contact the help team, and then realize that it is fact an incapability. For example, we can run one AI Draft per project; otherwise a staff member has to clone it to add an additional document. > > I lovvvve Responsive\! There is zero comparison to the tool I had previously that literally kept me working through the night\! ----- ### "Responsive Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *24. März 2026* | Pharmazeutika | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. > > **Nachteile**: The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. > > Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. ----- ### "Director, Proposals" — 5.0/5 > **Nick** | *16. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Progress tracking is one at the top of the list. The amount of hours it saves our proposal managers on tracking the progress of a project is massive. That lone is worth the value. In addition, the accountability it holds with associates in reviewing their content. Without a system like Responsive's content library and review structure, our responses would not be where they are at today. Lastly, employee management - I oversee the proposal team and each morning I review a status on all projects to see where we are and having a dashboard like the Project view, executive dashboards, etc. it's extremely helpful. > > **Nachteile**: Exporting into templates. My team spends a considerable amount of extra hours cleaning up the formatting when it doesn't export well or when we export into our template, but want to align with the clients RFP format - most times, it doesn't export that way, so the proposal managers spend countless hours cleaning this up. I have addressed this in the past. I would love it if there was a way we could have some sort of sequential author answering in the project. Today, we have multiple people that could contribute to one response. When one person is done, there is no way to track their progress, so what we have to do is create a manual process for tracking. It's extremely time consuming. > > I love Responsive. It's a great tool and best on the market. We couldn't do our job the same way without it. ----- Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten