--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Responsive zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Angebotsmanagement Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > RFP-Software, die den Antwortprozess durch Zusammenarbeit, zentrale Inhalte und Berichterstattung verbessert. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 190 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Responsive? RFPIO bietet Unternehmen aller Größen und Branchen, die auf RFPs reagieren, einen ROI. Erziele sofortigen ROI durch ein No-Nonsense-Setup, eine einfache und intuitive Nutzeroberfläche und robuste Integrationen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 190 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Region**: Beaverton, USA - **Gegründet**: 2015 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Chinesisch (traditionell), Deutsch, Dänisch, Englisch, Finnisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Koreanisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch, Schwedisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Israel, Kanada, Katar, Kuwait, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Saudi-Arabien, Schweden, Singapur, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und 3 weitere ## Funktionen - Angebotserstellung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automatische Formatierung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Content-Management - Daten-Import / -Export - Dokumentenmanagement - Fortschrittsverfolgung - Fälligkeits-Tracking - Inhalt-Bibliothek - Lieferanten-Management - Meilensteinverfolgung - Projektplanung/Terminierung - RFP-Management - Suchen / filtern - Third-Party Integrations - Versionskontrolle - Volltextsuche - Vorlagen - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Wissensbasis-Management - Wissensbibliothek - Workflow-Management - Zeit & Kosten Verfolgung - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (26 insgesamt) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... und 11 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Angebotsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Angebotsmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Ausschreibungsprogramme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [BPM-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) - [Wissensmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30094/knowledge-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (49 reviews) 2. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.5/5 (23 reviews) 3. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1254 reviews) 4. [VT Docs](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/117155/visiblethread-docs) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) 5. [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/133042/loopio) — 4.6/5 (74 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Many options for content organization" — 4.0/5 > **Amber** | *7. Januar 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: There are many options for organizing the Content Library, from tags, to collections, to multiple responses to a question, and more. The project management feature is also useful, especially the option to invite guests to collaborate and not require them to make an account. > > **Nachteile**: There are many minor glitches, which after contacting the support team, usually get fixed in a timely manner, but after a while I don't want to report every little thing and wished that the QA team would catch them before going into production. Also the customer care team is hit and miss, and we faced some communication issues when it came to billing. > > I use this every day as part of my job and I am overall satisfied with the use of the tool and its many features. I am currently sorting out our thousands of pieces of content and I find the process enjoyable. ----- ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27. März 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Nachteile**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "An extremely powerful content management system for RFPs and Sales content." — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. November 2025* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The rich feature set and flexibility around managing content is excellent. While it's a little intimidating at first, the amount of functionality is one of Responsive's strong points. > > **Nachteile**: Occasionally there's bugs and glitches. I think the downside of having so many features and functionality is the risk that code clashes sometimes and bugs are present. Responsive is very errr...responsive with bugs and addressing support tickets which is a plus, however, it would be good if bugs weren't present in the first place of course. > > It's been a great experience. A huge step up from our previous platform. The power of the platform is a clear win...the flexibility and options to manage and review content is second to none. Once familiar with the platform, it offers amazing flexibility to a power user. ----- ### "Responses about Responsive" — 4.0/5 > **Scott** | *4. Mai 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Innovative UI that updates frequently with new enhancements. The AI feature is very promising and has acted as a multiplier when it comes to productivity and speed of responding to RFIs and RFPs. I am also witnessing quality improvements with AI-generated responses over the last 6-9 months. The AI features help me be a rock star at work keep it coming\!\!\! > > **Nachteile**: Not flexible enough. Making AI runs seems complicated. Not enough collaborative features. Work on custom options. My manager added some custom fields and seems like we could not do much with them after creation? > > Excellent. A nice cloud service. Look for ways to motivate endusers to think about Responsive for more than just RFIs and RFPs and formal requests for Info... ----- ### "Responsive Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *24. März 2026* | Pharmazeutika | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. > > **Nachteile**: The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. > > Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. ----- Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/148054/Responsive) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten